Re: [Fink-devel] pangocairo: gconf2 vs. libxml2
Am 26.04.2008 um 19:43 schrieb Max Horn: Hi, using the 10.4 pangocairo branch: Can't resolve dependency libxml2-shlibs (= 2.6.30-1) for package gconf2-2.20.1-1 (no matching packages/versions found) Oh yeah, forgot this: Caladan-II:~/Desktop/WordPress$ fink list libxml2 Scanning package description files.. Information about 7858 packages read in 4 seconds. i libxml2 2.6.27-1002 XML parsing library, version 2 i libxml2-bin 2.6.27-1002 XML parsing library, version 2 libxml2-py23 2.6.30-1001 Python bindings for libxml2 library libxml2-py24 2.6.30-1001 Python bindings for libxml2 library libxml2-py25 2.6.30-1001 Python bindings for libxml2 library libxml2-rb18 0.3.8.4-2 Ruby bindings for libxml2 i libxml2-shlibs 2.6.27-1002 XML parsing library, version 2 Bye, Max - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Re: [Fink-devel] pangocairo: gconf2 vs. libxml2
Max Horn wrote: Am 26.04.2008 um 19:43 schrieb Max Horn: Hi, using the 10.4 pangocairo branch: Can't resolve dependency libxml2-shlibs (= 2.6.30-1) for package gconf2-2.20.1-1 (no matching packages/versions found) Oh yeah, forgot this: Caladan-II:~/Desktop/WordPress$ fink list libxml2 Scanning package description files.. Information about 7858 packages read in 4 seconds. i libxml2 2.6.27-1002 XML parsing library, version 2 Hmm, the pangocairo branch has had 2.6.30 for a long time: diff -u -b -w -r1.6.2.4 -r1.6.2.5 --- libxml2.info4 Aug 2007 03:33:09 - 1.6.2.4 +++ libxml2.info18 Sep 2007 14:43:07 - 1.6.2.5 @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ Package: libxml2 -Version: 2.6.27 +Version: 2.6.30 Revision: 1001 -- Martin - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Re: [Fink-devel] pangocairo: gconf2 vs. libxml2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Max Horn wrote: | Update: I just got a suspicion, and run touch on the .info file. | Now fink recognized that it was new. Ouch. I thought fink index | would force the index to be rebuilt, but obviously that is not the | case. I will now manually touch all my .info files, to make sure it | gets them right. I think for speed reasons, by default fink index trusts it's cache; you can do fink index --full to force it. - -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development http://www.racoonfink.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIE4m2Uu+jZtP2Zf4RAgtOAKCgwbKSIZRkmXzBsQchHZHTRL7CRwCeKjsU 7aCkvGkW26Hag5bAsCbvt5w= =SYVq -END PGP SIGNATURE- - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Re: [Fink-devel] pangocairo: gconf2 vs. libxml2
On Apr 26, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Max Horn wrote: Am 26.04.2008 um 19:55 schrieb Martin Costabel: Max Horn wrote: Am 26.04.2008 um 19:43 schrieb Max Horn: Hi, using the 10.4 pangocairo branch: Can't resolve dependency libxml2-shlibs (= 2.6.30-1) for package gconf2-2.20.1-1 (no matching packages/versions found) Oh yeah, forgot this: Caladan-II:~/Desktop/WordPress$ fink list libxml2 Scanning package description files.. Information about 7858 packages read in 4 seconds. i libxml2 2.6.27-1002 XML parsing library, version 2 Hmm, the pangocairo branch has had 2.6.30 for a long time: diff -u -b -w -r1.6.2.4 -r1.6.2.5 --- libxml2.info 4 Aug 2007 03:33:09 - 1.6.2.4 +++ libxml2.info 18 Sep 2007 14:43:07 - 1.6.2.5 @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ Package: libxml2 -Version: 2.6.27 +Version: 2.6.30 Revision: 1001 Indeed, weird. And my /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/ libxml2.info contains 2.6.30, too! I run fink index, just to make sure, but it keeps telling me that libxml2 2.6.27-1002 is most recent. Huh?!? Note: I am using fink 0.28.1 .. Update: I just got a suspicion, and run touch on the .info file. Now fink recognized that it was new. Ouch. I thought fink index would force the index to be rebuilt, but obviously that is not the case. I will now manually touch all my .info files, to make sure it gets them right. Bye, Max fink index -f That forces the cached .info file database to be rebuild from the actual files. I've had to do this off and on when manipulating .info files, but haven't found a clear enough set of circumstances to file a useful bug report. - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
