Re: [Fink-devel] Ethereal

[Max Horn]

At 16:03 Uhr +1000 05.04.2002, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
>On 4/4/02 11:07 PM, "Max Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>  Right now there is no support for snmp in ethereal, since I figured
>>  not everybody wants to have to install snmp just to get ethereal. I
>>  guess I could make an "ethereal-snmp" package if there is enough
>>  demand.
>>
>>
>>  Max
>
>This is slightly from left-field, but still relevant I think... What about
>implementing the other form of "Splitoffs" that was proposed a while back?
>Instead of having 'ethereal' and 'ethereal-snmp', for example, as separate
>.info files, there would be only one 'ethereal' .info file which specified
>the options, etc, for a different build of the package... This could
>certainly be in handy here, but if it's possible, should probably occur
>after the next distro release, and before Fink (package manager) 1.0, I
>think...

YOu are talking about variants here, not splitoffs. Those are an 
entierly different beast, and carry a big tail of their own problems 
with them. Not something we want to even attempt before 0.4.0 is out. 
And even after that, we need some more discussion before we can work 
on it, I think.



Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: 
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Ethereal

[Jeremy Higgs]

On 5/4/02 6:45 PM, "Max Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> At 16:03 Uhr +1000 05.04.2002, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
>> On 4/4/02 11:07 PM, "Max Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>>  Right now there is no support for snmp in ethereal, since I figured
>>>  not everybody wants to have to install snmp just to get ethereal. I
>>>  guess I could make an "ethereal-snmp" package if there is enough
>>>  demand.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  Max
>> 
>> This is slightly from left-field, but still relevant I think... What about
>> implementing the other form of "Splitoffs" that was proposed a while back?
>> Instead of having 'ethereal' and 'ethereal-snmp', for example, as separate
>> .info files, there would be only one 'ethereal' .info file which specified
>> the options, etc, for a different build of the package... This could
>> certainly be in handy here, but if it's possible, should probably occur
>> after the next distro release, and before Fink (package manager) 1.0, I
>> think...
> 
> YOu are talking about variants here, not splitoffs. Those are an
> entierly different beast, and carry a big tail of their own problems
> with them. Not something we want to even attempt before 0.4.0 is out.
> And even after that, we need some more discussion before we can work
> on it, I think.
> 
> 
> 
> Max

Yep, that's right! Sorry bout that... Yeah, it's pretty big, not something
before 0.4.0, but probably should be considered in the near future.


___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Re: CVS: packages/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnomepango1-1.0.1-1.info,1.1,1.2

[Max Horn]

At 3:18 Uhr -0800 05.04.2002, Masanori Sekino wrote:
>Update of /cvsroot/fink/packages/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome
>In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv18976
>
>Modified Files:
>   pango1-1.0.1-1.info
>Log Message:
>Set LANG=C before pango-querymodules.

OK so pango will now compile and not buserror in g_print (from glib) 
anymore. But I still get crashes in some other code that use glib. 
Can't we do anything more general to avoid this? What's going wrong 
there anyway?


Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: 
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Re: CVS: packages/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome pango1-1.0.1-1.info,1.1,1.2

[Masanori Sekino]

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:14:29 +0200
Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> OK so pango will now compile and not buserror in g_print (from glib) 
> anymore. But I still get crashes in some other code that use glib. 
> Can't we do anything more general to avoid this? What's going wrong 
> there anyway?

I just noticed g_print() does not crashes with LANG=C.

As you know, g_print() in glib-2.0.1 seems broken and it's the problem which
should be fixed, but I don't looked into it yet. I'll track down it lator.

-- 
Masanori Sekino
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Re: CVS: packages/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnomepango1-1.0.1-1.info,1.1,1.2

[Max Horn]

At 1:40 Uhr +0900 06.04.2002, Masanori Sekino wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:14:29 +0200
>Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>  OK so pango will now compile and not buserror in g_print (from glib)
>>  anymore. But I still get crashes in some other code that use glib.
>>  Can't we do anything more general to avoid this? What's going wrong
>>  there anyway?
>
>I just noticed g_print() does not crashes with LANG=C.
>
>As you know, g_print() in glib-2.0.1 seems broken and it's the problem which
>should be fixed, but I don't looked into it yet. I'll track down it lator.

OK, thanks. For now I'll just set LANG to C whenever I need it.


Cheers,

Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: 
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Plans for 0.4.0 and future releases

[Finlay Dobbie]

On Friday, April 5, 2002, at 02:37 AM, Ben Hines wrote:

> We do have a Fink buildserver, for those who missed Max's message - Max 
> is now the admin of Sourceforge OSX Compile Farm. Dual 800s. Rooted.

For those of you who missed fully reading and comprehending Max's 
message, building the binary distribution on the OS X Compiler Farm is 
too much of a security risk, which is why I made my suggestion.

  -- Finlay


___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] pilot-link-shlibs does not compile

[Justin Hallett]

okay thanks I can fix it

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>after uninstalling pilot-link, the error was reproducible. i attached
>the complete compile log.

¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,
  Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst   
  Phone: (780)-408-3094
Fax: (780)-454-3200
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 .·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,


___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] pilot-link-shlibs does not compile

[Masanori Sekino]

It's a relink bug of (g)libtool. Relinking will fail if there is no
pilot-link-shlibs already installed. libtool does *not* stops
with this error:

---
Making install in libpisock++
/bin/sh ../mkinstalldirs /sw/src/root-pilot-link-0.10.99-1/sw/lib
/bin/sh ../libtool  --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c libpisock++.la 
/sw/src/root-pilot-link-0.10.99-1/sw/lib/libpisock++.la
libtool: install: warning: relinking `libpisock++.la'
(cd /sw/src/pilot-link-0.10.99-1/pilot-link-0.10.99/libpisock++; /bin/sh ../libtool 
--mode=relink c++ -g -O2 -L../libpisock/.libs -L/sw/lib -o libpisock++.la -rpath 
/sw/lib -export-dynamic -version-info 0:0:0 address.lo appInfo.lo datebook.lo dlp.lo 
iambicExpense.lo memo.lo todo.lo ../libpisock/libpisock.la)
/sw/src/pilot-link-0.10.99-1/pilot-link-0.10.99/libpisock++/.libs
c++ -dynamiclib -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -o .libs/libpisock++.0.0.0.dylib  
address.lo appInfo.lo datebook.lo dlp.lo iambicExpense.lo memo.lo todo.lo  
-L/sw/src/pilot-link-0.10.99-1/pilot-link-0.10.99/libpisock/.libs -L/sw/lib 
/sw/lib/libpisock.dylib -lc -install_name  /sw/lib/libpisock++.0.dylib 
-compatibility_version 1 -current_version 1.0
c++: /sw/lib/libpisock.dylib: No such file or directory
libtool: install: error: relink `libpisock++.la' with the above command before 
installing it
---

Simple solution of this problem is disabling relinking:

---
diff -Naur pilot-link-0.10.99.old/ltmain.sh pilot-link-0.10.99.new/ltmain.sh
--- pilot-link-0.10.99.old/ltmain.shThu Mar 21 07:30:35 2002
+++ pilot-link-0.10.99.new/ltmain.shSat Apr  6 05:17:23 2002
@@ -1749,7 +1749,7 @@
 
  if test "$installed" = no; then
notinst_deplibs="$notinst_deplibs $lib"
-   need_relink=yes
+   # need_relink=yes
  fi
 
  if test -n "$old_archive_from_expsyms_cmds"; then
---



On Thu, 04 Apr 2002 16:23:10 -0700
"Justin Hallett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> this is very odd it makes it for me everytime...can you scroll up to the
> part that is attempts to make the lib i think it's the second phase and
> paste that to me?
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >hi,
> >
> >pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1 does not compile. it breaks as follows:
> >
> >  mkdir -p /sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/sw
> >  mkdir -p /sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/DEBIAN
> >  install -d -m 755 /sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/sw/lib
> >  mv /sw/src/root-pilot-link-0.10.99-1/sw/lib/libpisock++.*.dylib
> >/sw/src/root-pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1/sw/lib
> >  mv: cannot stat
> >`/sw/src/root-pilot-link-0.10.99-1/sw/lib/libpisock++.*.dylib': No such
> >file or directory
> >  ### mv failed, exit code 1
> >  Failed: installing pilot-link-shlibs-0.10.99-1 failed
> >
> >after removing the line
> >  lib/libpisock++.*.dylib
> >in the Files section, it compiles.
> >
> >kilian 
> 


-- 
Masanori Sekino
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] install helpers

[Chris Zubrzycki]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I was just wondering, has anyone thought or tried to bring something 
like debian's debconf to fink? In some cases, where the configuration 
needs to be customized to work correctly, it might be really useful. any 
comments or suggestions?

- -chris zubrzycki
- - --
PGP public key: http://homepage.mac.com/beren/publickey.txt
ID: 0xA2ABC070
Fingerprint: 26B0 BA6B A409 FA83 42B3  1688 FBF9 8232 A2AB C070

Security Is A Series Of Well-Defined Steps...

chmod -R 0 / ; and smile :)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (Darwin)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8rgm0+/mCMqKrwHARAj83AJ9tK6Rm8kHyz7MWkrH07BG46ZFvrwCgg2jw
bTcJzU+UsBVYtNaOSj5Ywrk=
=tXe/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Plans for 0.4.0 and future releases

[Ben Hines]

At 7:11 PM +0100 4/5/02, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>
>For those of you who missed fully reading and comprehending Max's 
>message, building the binary distribution on the OS X Compiler Farm 
>is too much of a security risk, which is why I made my suggestion.


Yep. I reread the message and noticed that, after. (i was let astray 
by his comment that he had built fink stuff on the servers)

Anyway, the idea that we shouldn't use the compile farm machines due 
to the fact that they could be compromised is IMO silly... But, 
whatever... :)

-Ben
-- 
http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel