Re: [Fink-users] sbcl-1.1.10-1

2013-08-15 Thread Richard Miles
After it tries different mirror sites, then it fails with checksum error.
Thanks for answering.

On Aug 15, 2013, at 3:59 AM, Jesse Alama wrote:

 Hi Richard,
 
 Thanks for the feedback! It seems there's a checksum error with SBCL 1.1.10. 
 Does the build process fails right away?
 
 Jesse
 
 On Aug 14, 2013, at 18:13, Richard Miles r.godzi...@comcast.net wrote:
 
 Feedback: not good
 sbcl ahs checksum error and can not be installed
 
 --
 Package manager version: 0.35.1
 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Aug 14 08:43:17 2013, 10.6, i386
 Mac OS X version: 10.6.8
 Xcode version: 3.2.6
 gcc version: 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3)
 make version: 3.82
 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander


--
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl-1.1.10-1

2013-08-15 Thread Alexander Hansen
I just fixed this:  when I sync'ed the 10.7 tree package description 
over I missed merging the Source-MD5 field for the i386 packaging. 
Sorry about that.

As a workaround, use fink fetch sbcl, then select option 1) when it 
complains.  After that, use fink install sbcl and select the Use the 
file anyway option.

On 8/15/13 8:52 AM, Richard Miles wrote:
 After it tries different mirror sites, then it fails with checksum error.
 Thanks for answering.

 On Aug 15, 2013, at 3:59 AM, Jesse Alama wrote:

 Hi Richard,

 Thanks for the feedback! It seems there's a checksum error with SBCL 1.1.10. 
 Does the build process fails right away?

 Jesse

 On Aug 14, 2013, at 18:13, Richard Miles r.godzi...@comcast.net wrote:

 Feedback: not good
 sbcl ahs checksum error and can not be installed

 --
 Package manager version: 0.35.1
 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Aug 14 08:43:17 2013, 10.6, i386
 Mac OS X version: 10.6.8
 Xcode version: 3.2.6
 gcc version: 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3)
 make version: 3.82
 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander



-- 
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison
My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/

--
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl-1.1.10-1

2013-08-15 Thread Richard Miles
Thanks. That worked. :)

On Aug 15, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 I just fixed this:  when I sync'ed the 10.7 tree package description over I 
 missed merging the Source-MD5 field for the i386 packaging. Sorry about that.
 
 As a workaround, use fink fetch sbcl, then select option 1) when it 
 complains.  After that, use fink install sbcl and select the Use the file 
 anyway option.
 
 On 8/15/13 8:52 AM, Richard Miles wrote:
 After it tries different mirror sites, then it fails with checksum error.
 Thanks for answering.
 
 On Aug 15, 2013, at 3:59 AM, Jesse Alama wrote:
 
 Hi Richard,
 
 Thanks for the feedback! It seems there's a checksum error with SBCL 
 1.1.10. Does the build process fails right away?
 
 Jesse
 
 On Aug 14, 2013, at 18:13, Richard Miles r.godzi...@comcast.net wrote:
 
 Feedback: not good
 sbcl ahs checksum error and can not be installed
 
 --
 Package manager version: 0.35.1
 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Aug 14 08:43:17 2013, 10.6, i386
 Mac OS X version: 10.6.8
 Xcode version: 3.2.6
 gcc version: 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3)
 make version: 3.82
 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander
 
 
 
 -- 
 Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
 Fink User Liaison
 My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/


--
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl update breaks maxima, xmaxima

2010-01-18 Thread Jesse Alama
Hi Sean, Alex,

I think I'm the root of the problem here -- I recently submitted an updated 
SBCL, bumping the version from 1.0.33 to 1.0.34, without corresponding with 
Alexander Hansen.  I was quick to submit an update to SBCL because of an 
packaging problem with SBLC unrelated to (x)maxima.

Jesse

On Jan 17, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Hello all,
 
 I've grown accustomed to the less than elegant way in which I have to 
 manually purge, rebuild, and reinstall maxima every time sbcl gets updated, 
 but it appears that this time the process failed. 
 
 
 If you've got a better way to handle it let me know.
 
 As best as we can tell maxima has to be depend on a particular
 version-revision of whatever LISP is used.  And we don't use a =
 versioning because we can't assume people are going to use 'update-all';
 it wouldn't do to have a maxima which was built on an earlier sbcl than
 what is currently on the system.
 
 I just updated and installed the new sbcl and now maxima refuses to build. 
 
 Technical information follows sig.
 
 Sean
 
 fink -V
 Package manager version: 0.29.10
 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Sat Jan 16 16:18:35 2010, 10.6, x86_64
 sbcl-1.0.34-1
 maxima-5.20.1-2
 
 error text: 
 sudo fink install maxima xmaxima
 Information about 7994 packages read in 2 seconds.
 Can't resolve dependency sbcl (= 1.0.33-1) for package maxima-5.20.1-2 
 (no
 matching packages/versions found)
 Exiting with failure.
 
 
 
 This was released without the coordination that we require in this
 circumstance.
 
 We are supposed to coordinate updates to sbcl and maxima when either the
 version, revision, or both are changed; I received no email about this.
 
 I'll see about working up an updated package description.
 
 - -- 
 Alexander Hansen
 Fink User Liaison
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
 
 iEUEARECAAYFAktTQ9IACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ/3PgCdHIMRjYPJh4zIR0bhAcSkNvpq
 StAAmIpXB0a5KO3icaBU3kKu85BfvuM=
 =Gnqp
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl update breaks maxima, xmaxima

2010-01-17 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 Hello all,
 
 I've grown accustomed to the less than elegant way in which I have to 
 manually purge, rebuild, and reinstall maxima every time sbcl gets updated, 
 but it appears that this time the process failed. 
 

If you've got a better way to handle it let me know.

As best as we can tell maxima has to be depend on a particular
version-revision of whatever LISP is used.  And we don't use a =
versioning because we can't assume people are going to use 'update-all';
it wouldn't do to have a maxima which was built on an earlier sbcl than
what is currently on the system.

 I just updated and installed the new sbcl and now maxima refuses to build. 
 
 Technical information follows sig.
 
 Sean
 
 fink -V
 Package manager version: 0.29.10
 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Sat Jan 16 16:18:35 2010, 10.6, x86_64
 sbcl-1.0.34-1
 maxima-5.20.1-2
 
 error text: 
 sudo fink install maxima xmaxima
 Information about 7994 packages read in 2 seconds.
 Can't resolve dependency sbcl (= 1.0.33-1) for package maxima-5.20.1-2 (no
 matching packages/versions found)
 Exiting with failure.
 


This was released without the coordination that we require in this
circumstance.

We are supposed to coordinate updates to sbcl and maxima when either the
version, revision, or both are changed; I received no email about this.

I'll see about working up an updated package description.

- -- 
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEUEARECAAYFAktTQ9IACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ/3PgCdHIMRjYPJh4zIR0bhAcSkNvpq
StAAmIpXB0a5KO3icaBU3kKu85BfvuM=
=Gnqp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl update breaks maxima, xmaxima

2010-01-17 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 Hi Sean, Alex,
 
 I think I'm the root of the problem here -- I recently submitted an updated 
 SBCL, bumping the version from 1.0.33 to 1.0.34, without corresponding with 
 Alexander Hansen.  I was quick to submit an update to SBCL because of an 
 packaging problem with SBLC unrelated to (x)maxima.
 
 Jesse
 


It's fixed now.  The issue is that maxima has a very strict versioned
dependency, and therefore will immediately gripe if sbcl is updated and
maxima is not done so simultaneously.

- -- 
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAktTZ1EACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ+9BACeLP2+qVlYmk3Xhvn/FmgckTCk
tkYAnA/SVSw0/i9jpmeYb4/gRWLPdYI6
=xqmv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-30 Thread Jean-François Mertens

On 30 Jan 2009, at 06:26, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 How should we implement this in the package description from the  
 tracker?


My previous msg was chiefly to encourage the maintainers to raise the
(three) bootstrapping issues upstream..

It seems more than likely to be harmless, IMHO,
so that we could just try to ignore it.
[
run-tests finishes normally _ and identically _
in both cases :
 Finished running tests.
 Status:
  Expected failure:float.pure.lisp / (SCALE-FLOAT-OVERFLOW BUG-372)
  Expected failure:float.pure.lisp / (ADDITION-OVERFLOW BUG-372)
  Expected failure:debug.impure.lisp / (UNDEFINED-FUNCTION BUG-353)
  Expected failure:debug.impure.lisp / (THROW NO-SUCH-TAG)
  Expected failure:external-format.impure.lisp / (CHARACTER- 
 DECODE-LARGE
  FORCE-END-OF- 
 FILE)
  Expected failure:packages.impure.lisp / USE-PACKAGE-CONFLICT-SET
  Expected failure:packages.impure.lisp / IMPORT-SINGLE-CONFLICT
 ok
 //apparent success (reached end of run-tests.sh normally)
]

If we want nevertheless to be a bit paranoiac, (costs only a couple  
of mins of
additional build-time..), one can just insert the required lines to  
do a re-build
in the InstallScript ; something like :
 InstallScript: 
   find %b -type d -name CVS -depth -exec rm -rf {} \;
   find %b -type f -name .cvsignore -depth -exec rm -f {} \;
   unset SBCL_HOME ; INSTALL_ROOT=%i sh install.sh
   sh make.sh %i/bin/sbcl \
 --core %i/lib/sbcl/sbcl.core \
 --disable-debugger --no-sysinit --no-userinit
   find %b -type f -name a.out -depth -exec rm -f {} \;
   cd tests  sh run-tests.sh
   unset SBCL_HOME ; INSTALL_ROOT=%i sh install.sh
   mv %i/bin/sbcl %i/lib/sbcl/sbcl
   echo '#! /bin/sh'  %i/bin/sbcl
   echo 'SBCL_HOME=%p/lib/sbcl/ exec %p/lib/sbcl/sbcl $@'  %i/ 
 bin/sbcl
   chmod 755 %i/bin/sbcl
 

(the line cd tests  sh run-tests.sh should go into a TestScript  
though ..)

Best,

JF

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-29 Thread Alexander Hansen
Jean-François Mertens wrote:

 On 28 Jan 2009, at 03:34, Jean-François Mertens wrote:

 It is OK _ modulo fixing the Source2-MD5 to
 3b222a1f945ca462a2884fc378362c33

 Still a small problem _ a paranoiac might want do a second build,
 with as bootstrap binary that of the first _:
 after the initial build I get 25595932 as size of %p/lib/sbcl/sbcl.core,
 and the second time 25587740 (which is then a fixed point..).
 In principle, the final output should be a fixed point, independent
 of what was used for bootstrapping...

 This seems a third reason calling for an additional bootstrapping step,
 in addition to
 - the second FIXME in make.sh
 - getting the bootstrap to work well with clisp and openmcl

 Could the maintainers raise this (those 3) issue upstream?

 JF Mertens


How should we implement this in the package description from the tracker? 
(I'm regretting having moved maxima away from CLISP)

-- 
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-28 Thread Jean-François Mertens

On 28 Jan 2009, at 03:34, Jean-François Mertens wrote:

 It is OK _ modulo fixing the Source2-MD5 to
 3b222a1f945ca462a2884fc378362c33

Still a small problem _ a paranoiac might want do a second build,
with as bootstrap binary that of the first _:
after the initial build I get 25595932 as size of %p/lib/sbcl/sbcl.core,
and the second time 25587740 (which is then a fixed point..).
In principle, the final output should be a fixed point, independent
of what was used for bootstrapping...

This seems a third reason calling for an additional bootstrapping step,
in addition to
- the second FIXME in make.sh
- getting the bootstrap to work well with clisp and openmcl

Could the maintainers raise this (those 3) issue upstream?

JF Mertens


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-27 Thread Alexander Hansen
It was updated a while ago.

On Jan 27, 2009, at 1:22 AM, Moritz Kaiser wrote:

 Alexander Hansen schrieb:
 Jean-François Mertens wrote:

 On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:44, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 [...]

 I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match;

 Of course. Should just involve version changes
 (tomorrow I may get my intel back ftom repair _
 but can't check today,..)
JF

 I just committed the Intel and PowerPC updates along with the  
 required
 maxima update.


 Are there any news regarding the Intel version of sbcl? It still  
 crashes during compile on my intel mac book, with 10.4.11

 ---8-*snip*
 sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core ../ 
 sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger --no- 
 sysinit --no-userinit
 //starting build: Tue Jan 27 03:01:29 CET 2009
 //SBCL_XC_HOST=../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core ../ 
 sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger --no- 
 sysinit --no-userinit
 //entering make-config.sh
 //ensuring the existence of output/ directory
 //initializing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local- 
 target-features.lisp-expr
 //guessing default target CPU architecture from host architecture
 //setting up CPU-architecture-dependent information
 sbcl_arch=x86
 //setting up symlink src/compiler/target
 //setting up symlink src/assembly/target
 //setting up symlink src/compiler/assembly
 //setting up OS-dependent information
 //finishing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local- 
 target-features.lisp-expr
 /in canonicalize-whitespace-1
 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./tests/test-status.lisp- 
 expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/ 
 runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/ 
 target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h
 /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.2527.tmp
 //entering make-host-1.sh
 //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis
 make-host-1.sh: line 31:  2538 Bus error   $SBCL_XC_HOST  
 make-host-1.lisp
 ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1
 ---8*snap*

I'll cc the maintainer of the Intel packaging.   Unfortunately I can't  
test this myself, since my Intel machine can't run 10.4 .
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-27 Thread Alexander Hansen
Jean-François Mertens wrote:

 On 27 Jan 2009, at 07:22, Moritz Kaiser wrote:

 Alexander Hansen schrieb:
 Jean-François Mertens wrote:

 On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:44, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 [...]

 I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match;

 Of course. Should just involve version changes
 (tomorrow I may get my intel back ftom repair _
 but can't check today,..)
 JF

 I just committed the Intel and PowerPC updates along with the required
 maxima update.


 Are there any news regarding the Intel version of sbcl? It still
 crashes during compile on my intel mac book, with 10.4.11

 ---8-*snip*
 sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core
 ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger
 --no-sysinit --no-userinit
 //starting build: Tue Jan 27 03:01:29 CET 2009
 //SBCL_XC_HOST=../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core
 ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger
 --no-sysinit --no-userinit
 //entering make-config.sh
 //ensuring the existence of output/ directory
 //initializing
 /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local-target-features.lisp-expr

 //guessing default target CPU architecture from host architecture
 //setting up CPU-architecture-dependent information
 sbcl_arch=x86
 //setting up symlink src/compiler/target
 //setting up symlink src/assembly/target
 //setting up symlink src/compiler/assembly
 //setting up OS-dependent information
 //finishing
 /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local-target-features.lisp-expr

 /in canonicalize-whitespace-1
 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./tests/test-status.lisp-expr
 ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c
 ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h
 ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h
 /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.2527.tmp
 //entering make-host-1.sh
 //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis
 make-host-1.sh: line 31:  2538 Bus error   $SBCL_XC_HOST
 make-host-1.lisp
 ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1
 ---8*snap*

 Right , had the same here. As we had noticed, the 1.023 binaries were
 broken on 10.4,
 but for  some unknown reason, the correction _ to use the 1.02
 binaries _ was done only for ppc's.

 Here follows the fix I used, which you can too if you have some
 version of sbcl installed:
 diff -r1.11 sbcl-i386.info
 29,30c29
sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl \
  --core ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core \
 ---
sh make.sh %p/bin/sbcl \


 Or you can just take the ppc info file: copy sbcl-powerpc.info to
 sbcl-i386.info,
 and change the architecture field from powerpc to i386

 JF Mertens

I'll redirect this on to the sbcl-intel maintainer.  When we tried just
copying/modifying the powerpc package description for the prior version
of the package, a problem apparently showed up.

-- 
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-27 Thread Jean-François Mertens

On 27 Jan 2009, at 07:22, Moritz Kaiser wrote:

 Alexander Hansen schrieb:
 Jean-François Mertens wrote:

 On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:44, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 [...]

 I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match;

 Of course. Should just involve version changes
 (tomorrow I may get my intel back ftom repair _
 but can't check today,..)
 JF

 I just committed the Intel and PowerPC updates along with the  
 required
 maxima update.


 Are there any news regarding the Intel version of sbcl? It still  
 crashes during compile on my intel mac book, with 10.4.11

 ---8-*snip*
 sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core ../ 
 sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger --no- 
 sysinit --no-userinit
 //starting build: Tue Jan 27 03:01:29 CET 2009
 //SBCL_XC_HOST=../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl -- 
 core ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger  
 --no-sysinit --no-userinit
 //entering make-config.sh
 //ensuring the existence of output/ directory
 //initializing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local- 
 target-features.lisp-expr
 //guessing default target CPU architecture from host architecture
 //setting up CPU-architecture-dependent information
 sbcl_arch=x86
 //setting up symlink src/compiler/target
 //setting up symlink src/assembly/target
 //setting up symlink src/compiler/assembly
 //setting up OS-dependent information
 //finishing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local- 
 target-features.lisp-expr
 /in canonicalize-whitespace-1
 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./tests/test-status.lisp- 
 expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/ 
 runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/ 
 target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h
 /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.2527.tmp
 //entering make-host-1.sh
 //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis
 make-host-1.sh: line 31:  2538 Bus error
 $SBCL_XC_HOST make-host-1.lisp
 ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1
 ---8*snap*

Right , had the same here. As we had noticed, the 1.023 binaries were  
broken on 10.4,
but for  some unknown reason, the correction _ to use the 1.02  
binaries _ was done only for ppc's.

Here follows the fix I used, which you can too if you have some  
version of sbcl installed:
 diff -r1.11 sbcl-i386.info
 29,30c29
sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl \
  --core ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core \
 ---
sh make.sh %p/bin/sbcl \


Or you can just take the ppc info file: copy sbcl-powerpc.info to  
sbcl-i386.info,
and change the architecture field from powerpc to i386

JF Mertens
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-27 Thread Jean-François Mertens

On 27 Jan 2009, at 16:38, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 I'll redirect this on to the sbcl-intel maintainer.  When we tried  
 just
 copying/modifying the powerpc package description for the prior  
 version
 of the package, a problem apparently showed up.

In particular, in Source2, powerpc -- x86 ...

JF

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-27 Thread Jesse Alama
Jean-François Mertens jean-francois.mert...@uclouvain.be writes:

 On 27 Jan 2009, at 16:38, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 I'll redirect this on to the sbcl-intel maintainer.  When we tried  
 just
 copying/modifying the powerpc package description for the prior  
 version
 of the package, a problem apparently showed up.

 In particular, in Source2, powerpc -- x86 ...

OK, I've resubmitted the sbcl-i386.info to use 1.0.2 for bootstrapping,
rather than 1.0.23.

Jesse

-- 
Jesse Alama (al...@stanford.edu)


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-27 Thread Alexander Hansen
Jesse Alama wrote:
 Jean-François Mertens jean-francois.mert...@uclouvain.be writes:

   
 On 27 Jan 2009, at 16:38, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 
 I'll redirect this on to the sbcl-intel maintainer.  When we tried  
 just
 copying/modifying the powerpc package description for the prior  
 version
 of the package, a problem apparently showed up.
   
 In particular, in Source2, powerpc -- x86 ...
 

 OK, I've resubmitted the sbcl-i386.info to use 1.0.2 for bootstrapping,
 rather than 1.0.23.

 Jesse

   
Sounds good.  I'd love it if somebody on 10.4/Intel could try it out.

-- 
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-27 Thread Jean-François Mertens

On 27 Jan 2009, at 23:24, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 Jesse Alama wrote:
 Jean-François Mertens jean-francois.mert...@uclouvain.be writes:


 On 27 Jan 2009, at 16:38, Alexander Hansen wrote:


 I'll redirect this on to the sbcl-intel maintainer.  When we tried
 just
 copying/modifying the powerpc package description for the prior
 version
 of the package, a problem apparently showed up.

 In particular, in Source2, powerpc -- x86 ...


 OK, I've resubmitted the sbcl-i386.info to use 1.0.2 for  
 bootstrapping,
 rather than 1.0.23.

 Jesse


 Sounds good.  I'd love it if somebody on 10.4/Intel could try it out.

It is OK _ modulo fixing the Source2-MD5 to  
3b222a1f945ca462a2884fc378362c33

JF
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-26 Thread Moritz Kaiser
Alexander Hansen schrieb:
 Jean-François Mertens wrote:
   
 On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:44, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 [...]
 
 I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match;
   
 Of course. Should just involve version changes
 (tomorrow I may get my intel back ftom repair _
 but can't check today,..)
 
 JF
 
 I just committed the Intel and PowerPC updates along with the required
 maxima update.

   
Are there any news regarding the Intel version of sbcl? It still crashes 
during compile on my intel mac book, with 10.4.11

---8-*snip*
sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core 
../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger 
--no-sysinit --no-userinit
//starting build: Tue Jan 27 03:01:29 CET 2009
//SBCL_XC_HOST=../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core 
../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger 
--no-sysinit --no-userinit
//entering make-config.sh
//ensuring the existence of output/ directory
//initializing 
/sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local-target-features.lisp-expr
//guessing default target CPU architecture from host architecture
//setting up CPU-architecture-dependent information
sbcl_arch=x86
//setting up symlink src/compiler/target
//setting up symlink src/assembly/target
//setting up symlink src/compiler/assembly
//setting up OS-dependent information
//finishing 
/sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local-target-features.lisp-expr
/in canonicalize-whitespace-1
/$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./tests/test-status.lisp-expr 
./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c 
./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h 
./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h
/$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.2527.tmp
//entering make-host-1.sh
//building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis
make-host-1.sh: line 31:  2538 Bus error   $SBCL_XC_HOST 
make-host-1.lisp
### execution of sh failed, exit code 1
---8*snap*

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-20 Thread Leigh Smith
Attached is the latest sbcl-powerpc.info that I've confirmed builds on  
10.5.6 on a PowerBook G4 ok. From all of your previous reports, it  
should build on 10.4.11 correctly also.




sbcl-powerpc.info
Description: Binary data




Leigh
--
Leigh M. Smith
mailto:le...@leighsmith.com
http://www.leighsmith.com
skype:aussieleighsmith



--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
Leigh Smith wrote:
 Attached is the latest sbcl-powerpc.info that I've confirmed builds on
 10.5.6 on a PowerBook G4 ok. From all of your previous reports, it
 should build on 10.4.11 correctly also.




 Leigh
 -- 
 Leigh M. Smith
 mailto:le...@leighsmith.com
 http://www.leighsmith.com
 skype:aussieleighsmith



Before anybody commits this, we should verify that it does indeed build
on 10.4; and maxima has to be updated concurrently.

I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match; since
not doing so requires me to have architecture-separated maxima package
descriptions. 

-- 
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
Jean-François Mertens wrote:

 On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:44, Alexander Hansen wrote:

 Before anybody commits this, we should verify that it does indeed build
 on 10.4;
 It does.
 and maxima has to be updated concurrently.
 Sure. (maxima builds and works fine with it)
 Best you do the commit, as maintainer of maxima,
 to make sure everything is coordinated well.

Agreed.
 I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match;
 Of course. Should just involve version changes
 (tomorrow I may get my intel back ftom repair _
 but can't check today,..)


 JF
I forwarded the original message on to the sbcl-intel maintainer, too
(I'd used up my available cc's on my email client so that wasn't
indicated in my reply), so with any luck he'll respond promptly.  If
not, I may have to bite the bullet and go with separate powerpc and i386
package descriptions for maxima.

-- 
Alexander Hansen
Fink User Liaison


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-19 Thread Jean-François Mertens

On 16 Jan 2009, at 09:40, Leigh Smith wrote:

 I've attached a new sbcl-powerpc.info which builds sbcl 1.0.24 on  
 PowerPC MacOS 10.5.6 with gcc 4.0.1

 Send me the error log if it doesn't build on 10.4.11 and Xcode 2.5

Didn't even try, since it uses the same 1.0.22 binary that we know is  
broken on 10.4...
But substituting the 1.0.2 binary in Source2, or using my own old  
sbcl to bootstrap,
both give a correct build.

As alredy said, pls use the 1.0.2 binary for bootstrapping _ or  
recreate a source2
working on both 10.4 and 10.5 using 1.0.24; no need to wait that one  
gets posted on
sourceforge (as already said, you can have my deb if needed..)

JF Mertens


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-19 Thread Leigh Smith
Perhaps my email of Jan 16th didn't get through:

 Begin forwarded message:

 From: Leigh Smith le...@leighsmith.com
 Date: 16 January 2009 12:20:17 PM
 To: Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr
 Cc: Jean-François Mertens j...@core.ucl.ac.be, Fink Users 
 fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
 , Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com, Sean Lake 
 odysseus9...@gmail.com 
 , Sebastián González s.gonza...@uclouvain.be
 Subject: Re: sbcl Compile Problem

 ok, thanks for the clarification. As I alluded to in my previous  
 message, the PPC binary 1.0.22 does run on 10.5. One of the most  
 recent changes of 1.0.24 is to allow binaries to run on both 10.4   
 10.5, so the final solution is to get a 1.0.24 binary posted onto  
 sourceforge so that we don't need two different versions of sbcl- 
 powerpc.info for the two versions. I will post out a new version of  
 sbcl-powerpc.info once I've had a chance to test 1.0.2 with 10.5.6.

 Leigh Smith wrote:
 I've attached a new sbcl-powerpc.info which builds sbcl 1.0.24 on  
 PowerPC MacOS 10.5.6 with gcc 4.0.1
 Send me the error log if it doesn't build on 10.4.11 and Xcode 2.5

 It crashes in exactly the same way as before. This is not  
 surprising, because the crash comes from the precompiled 1.0.22  
 binary that is used for bootstrapping the new version. And you are  
 still using the same binary as before. Please believe us when we  
 tell you that *this binary does not run* on 10.4. This is not the  
 fault of Fink's package; this thing should not exist on  
 sourceforge. Or maybe if it does run on 10.5 (which I don't know),  
 it should come with instructions to use it only on 10.5.

 Please use the bootstrap binary from a previous version, for  
 example 1.0.2 which is used in the sbcl-1.0.19-2 package that is  
 in 10.4/stable. I just built your 1.0.24 successfully on 10.4/ppc  
 using the 1.0.2 bootstrap binary.


Leigh
--
Leigh M. Smith
mailto:le...@leighsmith.com
http://www.leighsmith.com
skype:aussieleighsmith




--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-19 Thread Jean-François Mertens

On 19 Jan 2009, at 16:37, Leigh Smith wrote:

 Perhaps my email of Jan 16th didn't get through:


I see .. Sorry.

JF

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Leigh Smith wrote:
 I've attached a new sbcl-powerpc.info which builds sbcl 1.0.24 on 
 PowerPC MacOS 10.5.6 with gcc 4.0.1
 
 Send me the error log if it doesn't build on 10.4.11 and Xcode 2.5

It crashes in exactly the same way as before. This is not surprising, 
because the crash comes from the precompiled 1.0.22 binary that is used 
for bootstrapping the new version. And you are still using the same 
binary as before. Please believe us when we tell you that *this binary 
does not run* on 10.4. This is not the fault of Fink's package; this 
thing should not exist on sourceforge. Or maybe if it does run on 10.5 
(which I don't know), it should come with instructions to use it only on 
10.5.

Please use the bootstrap binary from a previous version, for example 
1.0.2 which is used in the sbcl-1.0.19-2 package that is in 10.4/stable. 
I just built your 1.0.24 successfully on 10.4/ppc using the 1.0.2 
bootstrap binary.

-- 
Martin


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-16 Thread Leigh Smith
I've attached a new sbcl-powerpc.info which builds sbcl 1.0.24 on  
PowerPC MacOS 10.5.6 with gcc 4.0.1


Send me the error log if it doesn't build on 10.4.11 and Xcode 2.5



sbcl-powerpc.info
Description: Binary data





Leigh
--
Leigh M. Smith
mailto:le...@leighsmith.com
http://www.leighsmith.com
skype:aussieleighsmith



--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-16 Thread Leigh Smith
ok, thanks for the clarification. As I alluded to in my previous  
message, the PPC binary 1.0.22 does run on 10.5. One of the most  
recent changes of 1.0.24 is to allow binaries to run on both 10.4   
10.5, so the final solution is to get a 1.0.24 binary posted onto  
sourceforge so that we don't need two different versions of sbcl- 
powerpc.info for the two versions. I will post out a new version of  
sbcl-powerpc.info once I've had a chance to test 1.0.2 with 10.5.6.



Leigh Smith wrote:
I've attached a new sbcl-powerpc.info which builds sbcl 1.0.24 on  
PowerPC MacOS 10.5.6 with gcc 4.0.1

Send me the error log if it doesn't build on 10.4.11 and Xcode 2.5


It crashes in exactly the same way as before. This is not  
surprising, because the crash comes from the precompiled 1.0.22  
binary that is used for bootstrapping the new version. And you are  
still using the same binary as before. Please believe us when we  
tell you that *this binary does not run* on 10.4. This is not the  
fault of Fink's package; this thing should not exist on sourceforge.  
Or maybe if it does run on 10.5 (which I don't know), it should come  
with instructions to use it only on 10.5.


Please use the bootstrap binary from a previous version, for example  
1.0.2 which is used in the sbcl-1.0.19-2 package that is in 10.4/ 
stable. I just built your 1.0.24 successfully on 10.4/ppc using the  
1.0.2 bootstrap binary.


--
Martin


Leigh
--
Leigh M. Smith
mailto:le...@leighsmith.com
http://www.leighsmith.com
skype:aussieleighsmith



--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-15 Thread Jean-François Mertens
I had the same problem.
In addition, trying to bootstrap instead from
clisp or from openmcl both failed too.

So I had to bootstrap from the existing sbcl binary;
the following fix will get users who have already
some sbcl installed off the hook :

diff -r1.11 sbcl-powerpc.info
26,27c26,27
   sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl \
 --core ../sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin/output/sbcl.core \
---
sh make.sh %p/bin/sbcl \
  #   --core ../sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin/output/ 
sbcl.core \


As to the package, if the maintainer doesn't have another solution,
I can send him my deb file, which he could then repackage as a  
Source2 :
it seems likely that a bootstrap binary built on 10.4 may work on 10.5
(while from what we're seeing the opposite isn't true).

JF Mertens


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-14 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c
 ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h
 ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h
 ./src/runtime/target-os.h
 /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.5606.tmp
 //entering make-host-1.sh
 //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis
 make-host-1.sh: line 31:  5616 Bus error   $SBCL_XC_HOST
 make-host-1.lisp
 ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1
[]
 It didn't help.  I get the same failure on 10.4/PowerPC with Xcode  
 2.5.  I'll cc the maintainer.

It seems this version of sbcl cannot be built from its so-called sources 
on ppc. The reason is that it uses an older version of itself for 
compilation, and this older version comes, as a pre-compiled binary, 
with the sources. The supplied version for ppc crashes with a bus 
error. It not really possible to find out why, because it is 
precompiled. The stack trace is

 Thread 0 Crashed:
 0   libSystem.B.dylib   0x9012cab0 _malloc_initialize + 1016
 1   libSystem.B.dylib   0x90002fb8 malloc + 48
 2   sbcl0xa9bc successful_malloc + 28
 3   sbcl0xaa10 copied_string + 32
 4   sbcl0xde2c os_get_runtime_executable_path + 76
 5   sbcl0xac18 main + 104
 6   sbcl0x1f74 start + 68

One could try to make the package builddepend on clisp and try to 
compile it with clisp, which is a suggested procedure. When I just tried 
this by hand, it went quite far, but eventually crashed with the error

 //entering make-target-1.sh
 //building runtime system and symbol table file
 GNUmakefile:31: genesis/Makefile.features: No such file or directory
 make: *** No rule to make target `genesis/Makefile.features'.  Stop.

So this would need some more porting effort.

-- 
Martin




--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-14 Thread Sean Lake
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
 Alexander Hansen wrote:
 []

 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c
 ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h
 ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h
 ./src/runtime/target-os.h
 /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.5606.tmp
 //entering make-host-1.sh
 //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis
 make-host-1.sh: line 31:  5616 Bus error   $SBCL_XC_HOST
 make-host-1.lisp
 ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1

 []

 It didn't help.  I get the same failure on 10.4/PowerPC with Xcode  2.5.
  I'll cc the maintainer.

 It seems this version of sbcl cannot be built from its so-called sources on
 ppc. The reason is that it uses an older version of itself for compilation,
 and this older version comes, as a pre-compiled binary, with the sources.
 The supplied version for ppc crashes with a bus error. It not really
 possible to find out why, because it is precompiled. The stack trace is

 Thread 0 Crashed:
 0   libSystem.B.dylib   0x9012cab0 _malloc_initialize + 1016
 1   libSystem.B.dylib   0x90002fb8 malloc + 48
 2   sbcl0xa9bc successful_malloc + 28
 3   sbcl0xaa10 copied_string + 32
 4   sbcl0xde2c os_get_runtime_executable_path + 76
 5   sbcl0xac18 main + 104
 6   sbcl0x1f74 start + 68

 One could try to make the package builddepend on clisp and try to compile it
 with clisp, which is a suggested procedure. When I just tried this by hand,
 it went quite far, but eventually crashed with the error

 //entering make-target-1.sh
 //building runtime system and symbol table file
 GNUmakefile:31: genesis/Makefile.features: No such file or directory
 make: *** No rule to make target `genesis/Makefile.features'.  Stop.

 So this would need some more porting effort.

 --
 Martin


That's odd. I have sbcl 1.0.19 installed. An error like that sounds
like it should affect all versions.

Sean

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-14 Thread Alexander Hansen

On Jan 14, 2009, at 3:08 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:

 Alexander Hansen wrote:
 []
 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/ 
 foo.c
 ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h
 ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h
 ./src/runtime/target-os.h
 /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.5606.tmp
 //entering make-host-1.sh
 //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis
 make-host-1.sh: line 31:  5616 Bus error
 $SBCL_XC_HOST
 make-host-1.lisp
 ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1
 []
 It didn't help.  I get the same failure on 10.4/PowerPC with Xcode   
 2.5.  I'll cc the maintainer.

 It seems this version of sbcl cannot be built from its so-called  
 sources on ppc. The reason is that it uses an older version of  
 itself for compilation, and this older version comes, as a pre- 
 compiled binary, with the sources. The supplied version for ppc  
 crashes with a bus error. It not really possible to find out why,  
 because it is precompiled. The stack trace is

 Thread 0 Crashed:
 0   libSystem.B.dylib   0x9012cab0 _malloc_initialize + 1016
 1   libSystem.B.dylib   0x90002fb8 malloc + 48
 2   sbcl0xa9bc successful_malloc + 28
 3   sbcl0xaa10 copied_string + 32
 4   sbcl0xde2c os_get_runtime_executable_path +  
 76
 5   sbcl0xac18 main + 104
 6   sbcl0x1f74 start + 68

 One could try to make the package builddepend on clisp and try to  
 compile it with clisp, which is a suggested procedure. When I just  
 tried this by hand, it went quite far, but eventually crashed with  
 the error

 //entering make-target-1.sh
 //building runtime system and symbol table file
 GNUmakefile:31: genesis/Makefile.features: No such file or directory
 make: *** No rule to make target `genesis/Makefile.features'.  Stop.

 So this would need some more porting effort.

 -- 
 Martin





Perhaps the bootstrap binary is compiled on 10.5:  I _did_ test this  
on 10.5/PowerPC before adding the .info file to the distribution.  I  
naively assumed that 10.4 would be no problem, since historically I'd  
had problems with 10.5 rather than 10.4 .


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-14 Thread Martin Costabel
Sean Lake wrote:
[]
 Thread 0 Crashed:
 0   libSystem.B.dylib   0x9012cab0 _malloc_initialize + 1016
 1   libSystem.B.dylib   0x90002fb8 malloc + 48
 2   sbcl0xa9bc successful_malloc + 28
 3   sbcl0xaa10 copied_string + 32
 4   sbcl0xde2c os_get_runtime_executable_path + 76
 5   sbcl0xac18 main + 104
 6   sbcl0x1f74 start + 68
 One could try to make the package builddepend on clisp and try to compile it
 with clisp, which is a suggested procedure. When I just tried this by hand,
 it went quite far, but eventually crashed with the error

 //entering make-target-1.sh
 //building runtime system and symbol table file
 GNUmakefile:31: genesis/Makefile.features: No such file or directory
 make: *** No rule to make target `genesis/Makefile.features'.  Stop.
 So this would need some more porting effort.

 --
 Martin

 
 That's odd. I have sbcl 1.0.19 installed. An error like that sounds
 like it should affect all versions.

Yes, it looks like a buffer overflow or something, but:
I have 1.0.15 installed, which works, and also the version 1.0.2 it uses 
for bootstrapping works:

costabel% 
/sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.15-1/sbcl-1.0.2-powerpc-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl 
--version
SBCL 1.0.2
costabel% /sw/bin/sbcl --version
SBCL 1.0.15
costabel% 
/sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.23-2/sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl 
--version
Bus error

-- 
Martin


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-14 Thread Leigh Smith
I'll see if I can build SBCL 1.0.24 on PPC tonight and if so, I'll  
prepare some .info files for updating the fink unstable distribution.

 Hi all,

 Unfortunately I no longer have access to PPC machines.  For this  
 reason, I asked Leigh Smith some time ago whether he would care to  
 become the maintainer of the package.  He has kindly accepted this  
 invitation (his main machine is an Intel but he still has a G4 at  
 hand).

 Once the new package version of SBCL is submitted, please don't  
 forget to update the maintainer field so that it points to Leigh. If  
 one of you feels eager to become the maintainer, you could still ask  
 him (he's in CC).  Sorry I can't help any further in solving this  
 issue with SBCL.

 Best,
 Sebastián


Leigh
--
Leigh M. Smith
mailto:le...@leighsmith.com
http://www.leighsmith.com
skype:aussieleighsmith




--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-14 Thread Sebastián González
Hi all,

Unfortunately I no longer have access to PPC machines.  For this  
reason, I asked Leigh Smith some time ago whether he would care to  
become the maintainer of the package.  He has kindly accepted this  
invitation (his main machine is an Intel but he still has a G4 at hand).

Once the new package version of SBCL is submitted, please don't forget  
to update the maintainer field so that it points to Leigh. If one of  
you feels eager to become the maintainer, you could still ask him  
(he's in CC).  Sorry I can't help any further in solving this issue  
with SBCL.

Best,
Sebastián

On 14 Jan 2009, at 04:57, Alexander Hansen wrote:


 On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:40 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:


 On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Sean Lake wrote:

 Hello all,

 sbcl version 1.0.23-2 is failing to build. The error is:

 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c
 ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h
 ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h
 ./src/runtime/target-os.h
 /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.5606.tmp
 //entering make-host-1.sh
 //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis
 make-host-1.sh: line 31:  5616 Bus error   $SBCL_XC_HOST
 make-host-1.lisp
 ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1

 The result of fink --version is:
 Package manager version: 0.28.6
 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Tue Jan 13 18:47:59 2009,  
 10.4, powerpc

 More details: Mac OS X 10.4.11 on an iBook PPC G4 800 with 640 MB  
 RAM,
 Xcode 2.4.1

 Should I update Xcode? Would that help, or just burn up time as I
 recompile everything?

 Thanks,
 Sean


 You wouldn't need to recompile everything.  Once something's built  
 it's built, so all of your existing packages would be safe.

 I've already got Xcode 2.5 on my Tiger setup, so I can try that (I  
 didn't do a 10.4 test before committing sbcl-1.0.23).

 It didn't help.  I get the same failure on 10.4/PowerPC with Xcode  
 2.5.  I'll cc the maintainer.


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

2009-01-13 Thread Alexander Hansen

On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:40 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:


 On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Sean Lake wrote:

 Hello all,

 sbcl version 1.0.23-2 is failing to build. The error is:

 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c
 ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h
 ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h
 ./src/runtime/target-os.h
 /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.5606.tmp
 //entering make-host-1.sh
 //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis
 make-host-1.sh: line 31:  5616 Bus error   $SBCL_XC_HOST
 make-host-1.lisp
 ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1

 The result of fink --version is:
 Package manager version: 0.28.6
 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Tue Jan 13 18:47:59 2009,  
 10.4, powerpc

 More details: Mac OS X 10.4.11 on an iBook PPC G4 800 with 640 MB  
 RAM,
 Xcode 2.4.1

 Should I update Xcode? Would that help, or just burn up time as I
 recompile everything?

 Thanks,
 Sean


 You wouldn't need to recompile everything.  Once something's built  
 it's built, so all of your existing packages would be safe.

 I've already got Xcode 2.5 on my Tiger setup, so I can try that (I  
 didn't do a 10.4 test before committing sbcl-1.0.23).

It didn't help.  I get the same failure on 10.4/PowerPC with Xcode  
2.5.  I'll cc the maintainer.


--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-02-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Friday 25 January 2008 12:50:09 pm Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
 Mark J. Reed wrote:
   On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 wrote:
   Dear all,
  
   I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1.
 
   While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl
   1.0.13 working on 10.5.1:
 
   (0)wazowski sbcl
   This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
   More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/.
 
   SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
   It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
   BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
   distribution for more information.
   * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t)
   ProductName:Mac OS X
   ProductVersion: 10.5.1
   BuildVersion:   9B18
 
   #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0
   *
 
 
   This is why I like to have both systems installed.  Used to have
   fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after
   the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again...

 That's a good sign:  if a Macports port of a package exists, that
 usually means we can make a Fink version; the reverse is also true.
 It'll probably just take some ironing out of dependencies and ensuring
 that all files are installed in policy-compliant locations.



Fink's sbcl has just been updated to 1.10.14 -- it works on Leopard,

-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
akh AT finkproject DOT org
Fink User Liaison and Documenter

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-02-09 Thread Normen Müller
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
 On Friday 25 January 2008 12:50:09 pm Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
   
 Mark J. Reed wrote:
 
  On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
 wrote:
 
 Dear all,

 I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1.
 
  While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl
  1.0.13 working on 10.5.1:

  (0)wazowski sbcl
  This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
  More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/.

  SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
  It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
  BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
  distribution for more information.
  * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t)
  ProductName:Mac OS X
  ProductVersion: 10.5.1
  BuildVersion:   9B18

  #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0
  *


  This is why I like to have both systems installed.  Used to have
  fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after
  the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again...
   
 That's a good sign:  if a Macports port of a package exists, that
 usually means we can make a Fink version; the reverse is also true.
 It'll probably just take some ironing out of dependencies and ensuring
 that all files are installed in policy-compliant locations.


 

 Fink's sbcl has just been updated to 1.10.14 -- it works on Leopard,
Well, that's really great to hear!!!  Thanks for your efforts, I shall 
consider to switch back to fink ;-)

Cheers,
  /nm

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-26 Thread Normen MŸueller
Mark J. Reed wrote:
 On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen MÃŒller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Dear all,

 I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1.
 

 While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl
 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1:

 (0)wazowski sbcl
 This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
 More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/.

 SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
 It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
 BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
 distribution for more information.
 * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t)
 ProductName:Mac OS X
 ProductVersion: 10.5.1
 BuildVersion:   9B18

 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0
 *


 This is why I like to have both systems installed.  Used to have
 fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after
 the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again...
   
I got it working!!!

$ port search sbcl
sbcl   lang/sbcl  1.0.13   The Steel Bank Common Lisp system
[~]
$ sudo port install sbcl
Password:
Portfile changed since last build; discarding previous state.
---  Fetching sbcl
---  Attempting to fetch sbcl-1.0.13-source.tar.bz2 from 
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sbcl
---  Verifying checksum(s) for sbcl
---  Extracting sbcl
---  Applying patches to sbcl
---  Configuring sbcl
---  Building sbcl with target all
---  Staging sbcl into destroot
---  Installing sbcl 1.0.13_0+test
---  Activating sbcl 1.0.13_0+test
---  Cleaning sbcl
[~]
$ sbcl
This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/.

SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
distribution for more information.
*


GREAT!  Thanks to all again!

Cheers,
  /nm

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-25 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Mark J. Reed wrote:
  On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  Dear all,
 
  I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1.

  While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl
  1.0.13 working on 10.5.1:

  (0)wazowski sbcl
  This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
  More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/.

  SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
  It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
  BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
  distribution for more information.
  * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t)
  ProductName:Mac OS X
  ProductVersion: 10.5.1
  BuildVersion:   9B18

  #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0
  *


  This is why I like to have both systems installed.  Used to have
  fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after
  the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again...
That's a good sign:  if a Macports port of a package exists, that 
usually means we can make a Fink version; the reverse is also true.  
It'll probably just take some ironing out of dependencies and ensuring 
that all files are installed in policy-compliant locations.


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-25 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear all,

 I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1.

While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl
1.0.13 working on 10.5.1:

(0)wazowski sbcl
This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/.

SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
distribution for more information.
* (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t)
ProductName:Mac OS X
ProductVersion: 10.5.1
BuildVersion:   9B18

#SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0
*


This is why I like to have both systems installed.  Used to have
fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after
the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again...
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-25 Thread Richard E. Miles
Just type sudo port install sbcl

On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Normen MŸüller wrote:

 Mark J. Reed wrote:
 On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:

 Dear all,

 I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1.


 While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl
 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1:

 (0)wazowski sbcl
 This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
 More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/.

 SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
 It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
 BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
 distribution for more information.
 * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t)
 ProductName:Mac OS X
 ProductVersion: 10.5.1
 BuildVersion:   9B18

 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0
 *


 This is why I like to have both systems installed.  Used to have
 fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after
 the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again...

 He Mark,

 I am completely new to MacPorts, sorry.  How do I get the latest  
 version
 of sbcl?  The ``port search sbcl'' command gives me ``sbcl lang/sbcl
 1.0.12 The Steel Bank Common''.  I checked my MacPorts version by  
 ``sudo
 port selfupdate'' which returned ``MacPorts base version 1.600  
 installed''.

 Any help would be appreciated.

 Cheers,
  /nm

 -
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
 Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
 ___
 Fink-users mailing list
 Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-25 Thread Normen MŸüller
Mark J. Reed wrote:
 On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Dear all,

 I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1.
 

 While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl
 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1:

 (0)wazowski sbcl
 This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
 More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/.

 SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
 It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
 BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
 distribution for more information.
 * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t)
 ProductName:Mac OS X
 ProductVersion: 10.5.1
 BuildVersion:   9B18

 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0
 *


 This is why I like to have both systems installed.  Used to have
 fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after
 the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again...
   
He Mark,

I am completely new to MacPorts, sorry.  How do I get the latest version 
of sbcl?  The ``port search sbcl'' command gives me ``sbcl lang/sbcl 
1.0.12 The Steel Bank Common''.  I checked my MacPorts version by ``sudo 
port selfupdate'' which returned ``MacPorts base version 1.600 installed''.

Any help would be appreciated.

Cheers,
  /nm

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-25 Thread Normen Mueller
Mark J. Reed wrote:
 On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen MÃŒller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Dear all,

 I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1.
 

 While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl
 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1:

 (0)wazowski sbcl
 This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
 More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/.

 SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
 It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
 BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
 distribution for more information.
 * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t)
 ProductName:Mac OS X
 ProductVersion: 10.5.1
 BuildVersion:   9B18

 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0
 *


 This is why I like to have both systems installed.  Used to have
 fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after
 the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again...
   
Thanks a lot for pointing me to MacPorts!!! I will try it asap and post 
my feedback to this thread.

Cheers,
  /nm

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-25 Thread Alexander Hansen
Normen Mueller wrote:
 Mark J. Reed wrote:
   
 On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen MÃŒller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 
 Dear all,

 I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1.
 
   
 While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl
 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1:

 (0)wazowski sbcl
 This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
 More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/.

 SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
 It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
 BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
 distribution for more information.
 * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t)
 ProductName:Mac OS X
 ProductVersion: 10.5.1
 BuildVersion:   9B18

 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0
 *


 This is why I like to have both systems installed.  Used to have
 fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after
 the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again...
   
 
 Thanks a lot for pointing me to MacPorts!!! I will try it asap and post 
 my feedback to this thread.

 Cheers,
   /nm
   
A word of caution:  be careful when building packages in such cases.  
You can wind up with Macports packages linking to Fink libraries, and 
vice versa.  This can cause problems for you down the road when you 
change things via updates, removals, ...

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-25 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Jan 25, 2008 11:55 AM, Alexander Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 A word of caution:  be careful when building packages in such cases.
 You can wind up with Macports packages linking to Fink libraries, and
 vice versa.  This can cause problems for you down the road when you
 change things via updates, removals, ...

This shouldn't be a problem in general. Each system lives in a
separate part of the filesystem and keeps its own track of
dependencies, so instead of cross-links what you get is multiple
copies of common files such as the readline library.

But an experimental/unstable (or just broken) port might have a
dependency that doesn't get included as such at the package level,
leaving the build-time configure script to hunt it down on its own -
in that case, it might find something installed by the other system.
I haven't run into this yet in practice.  One way to avoid it would be
to wrap the fink and port commands so they have a clean room shell
environment, e.g.

alias fink=env -i /sw/bin/fink
alias port=env -i /opt/local/bin/port

If you find that they need some environment variables set, you can add
them, e.g.

alias port=env -i LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/local/lib /opt/local/bin/port

but so far that doesn't seem to be necessary.


-- 
Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-25 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Jan 25, 2008 4:07 PM, Richard E. Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just type sudo port install sbcl

Should take this offlist, as it's not on-topic for a fink list...

But how to install it wasn't Normen's issue; he got that far.  His
concern was that the version he saw was 1.0.12 whereas the one I
pasted from was 1.0.13.  Since 1.0.13 is also what's listed on the
website (for both i386 and ppc),  I suggested a sudo port -d sync.

-- 
Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-25 Thread Richard E. Miles
Sorry I didn't see that. When I did sudo port sbcl I got the 1.0.13

On Jan 25, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Mark J. Reed wrote:

 On Jan 25, 2008 4:07 PM, Richard E. Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 wrote:
 Just type sudo port install sbcl

 Should take this offlist, as it's not on-topic for a fink list...

 But how to install it wasn't Normen's issue; he got that far.  His
 concern was that the version he saw was 1.0.12 whereas the one I
 pasted from was 1.0.13.  Since 1.0.13 is also what's listed on the
 website (for both i386 and ppc),  I suggested a sudo port -d sync.

 -- 
 Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-24 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Thursday 24 January 2008 01:33:24 am you wrote:
 Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
  On Wednesday 23 January 2008 09:58:01 Normen MŸüller wrote:
  Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
  On Wednesday 23 January 2008 04:13:35 Normen Müller wrote:
  Dear all,
 
  I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1.  Has no one
  any interests to get this package running?  Any other suggestions?
 
  Cheers,
 /nm
 
  It's available on 10.5:
 
  http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/sbcl
 
  If you're on an Intel box you probably need to enable the unstable
  tree, which you should be able to do via fink configure, and run a
  selfupdate with rsync or cvs.
 
  Dear Alexander,
 
  first of all thanks for fast reply!
 
  I am not on a Intel box, but have the last generation of ``real'' Macs
  ;-)
 
  If I perform an ``fink apropos sbcl'' I get the following output:
 
  Information about 6505 packages read in 1 seconds.
   sbcl 1.0.5-1  ANSI Common Lisp implementation
 
 
  This version, however, does not compile on my machine.  As I am a dumb
  fink user, could you please advice me what I have to modify in my fink
  configuration in to get sbcl under the above mentioned URL running?
 
  Cheers,
/nm
 
  You're going to have to provide some build output, so that we can see
  _how_ the failure occurs.

 Dear Alexander,

 please find attached my terminal saved output after trying to compile
 sbcl.  Hopefully you may indentify where the problem is...

 Thanks again for your help!

 Cheers,
   /nm

Sending this back to the mailing list, as this isn't my package:

...
//entering make-target-1.sh
//building runtime system and symbol table file
rm -f *.[do] sbcl sbcl.nm sbcl.h core *.tmp 
# the depend file is obsolete
rm -f depend
echo '#include genesis/config.h' sbcl.h
echo '#include genesis/constants.h' sbcl.h
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp  -c -o alloc.o 
alloc.c
alloc.c: In function 'pa_alloc':
alloc.c:64: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast
alloc.c:70: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
alloc.c:43: warning: unused variable 'th'
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp  -c -o 
backtrace.o backtrace.c
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp  -c -o 
breakpoint.o breakpoint.c
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp  -c -o 
coreparse.o coreparse.c
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp  -c -o dynbind.o 
dynbind.c
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp  -c -o funcall.o 
funcall.c
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp  -c -o 
gc-common.o gc-common.c
gc-common.c: In function 'maybe_gc':
gc-common.c:2472: warning: implicit declaration of 
function 'check_gc_signals_unblocked_or_lose'
gc-common.c:2475: warning: implicit declaration of 
function 'unblock_gc_signals'
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp  -c -o globals.o 
globals.c
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp  -c -o interr.o 
interr.c
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp  -c -o 
interrupt.o interrupt.c
interrupt.c: In function 'maybe_now_maybe_later':
interrupt.c:727: error: 'struct __darwin_mcontext' has no member named 'ss'
interrupt.c: In function 'low_level_maybe_now_maybe_later':
interrupt.c:757: error: 'struct __darwin_mcontext' has no member named 'ss'
interrupt.c: In function 'interrupt_handle_now_handler':
interrupt.c:831: error: 'struct __darwin_mcontext' has no member named 'ss'
make: *** [interrupt.o] Error 1

I get an identical failure (10.5.1 powerPC).

-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
akh AT finkproject DOT org
Fink User Liaison and Documenter


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] sbcl

2008-01-23 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 04:13:35 Normen Müller wrote:
 Dear all,

 I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1.  Has no one
 any interests to get this package running?  Any other suggestions?

 Cheers,
/nm


It's available on 10.5:

http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/sbcl

If you're on an Intel box you probably need to enable the unstable tree, which 
you should be able to do via fink configure, and run a selfupdate with 
rsync or cvs.

-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
akh AT finkproject DOT org
Fink User Liaison and Documenter

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users