Re: [Fink-users] sbcl-1.1.10-1
After it tries different mirror sites, then it fails with checksum error. Thanks for answering. On Aug 15, 2013, at 3:59 AM, Jesse Alama wrote: Hi Richard, Thanks for the feedback! It seems there's a checksum error with SBCL 1.1.10. Does the build process fails right away? Jesse On Aug 14, 2013, at 18:13, Richard Miles r.godzi...@comcast.net wrote: Feedback: not good sbcl ahs checksum error and can not be installed -- Package manager version: 0.35.1 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Aug 14 08:43:17 2013, 10.6, i386 Mac OS X version: 10.6.8 Xcode version: 3.2.6 gcc version: 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3) make version: 3.82 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl-1.1.10-1
I just fixed this: when I sync'ed the 10.7 tree package description over I missed merging the Source-MD5 field for the i386 packaging. Sorry about that. As a workaround, use fink fetch sbcl, then select option 1) when it complains. After that, use fink install sbcl and select the Use the file anyway option. On 8/15/13 8:52 AM, Richard Miles wrote: After it tries different mirror sites, then it fails with checksum error. Thanks for answering. On Aug 15, 2013, at 3:59 AM, Jesse Alama wrote: Hi Richard, Thanks for the feedback! It seems there's a checksum error with SBCL 1.1.10. Does the build process fails right away? Jesse On Aug 14, 2013, at 18:13, Richard Miles r.godzi...@comcast.net wrote: Feedback: not good sbcl ahs checksum error and can not be installed -- Package manager version: 0.35.1 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Aug 14 08:43:17 2013, 10.6, i386 Mac OS X version: 10.6.8 Xcode version: 3.2.6 gcc version: 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3) make version: 3.82 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl-1.1.10-1
Thanks. That worked. :) On Aug 15, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: I just fixed this: when I sync'ed the 10.7 tree package description over I missed merging the Source-MD5 field for the i386 packaging. Sorry about that. As a workaround, use fink fetch sbcl, then select option 1) when it complains. After that, use fink install sbcl and select the Use the file anyway option. On 8/15/13 8:52 AM, Richard Miles wrote: After it tries different mirror sites, then it fails with checksum error. Thanks for answering. On Aug 15, 2013, at 3:59 AM, Jesse Alama wrote: Hi Richard, Thanks for the feedback! It seems there's a checksum error with SBCL 1.1.10. Does the build process fails right away? Jesse On Aug 14, 2013, at 18:13, Richard Miles r.godzi...@comcast.net wrote: Feedback: not good sbcl ahs checksum error and can not be installed -- Package manager version: 0.35.1 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Aug 14 08:43:17 2013, 10.6, i386 Mac OS X version: 10.6.8 Xcode version: 3.2.6 gcc version: 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3) make version: 3.82 Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl update breaks maxima, xmaxima
Hi Sean, Alex, I think I'm the root of the problem here -- I recently submitted an updated SBCL, bumping the version from 1.0.33 to 1.0.34, without corresponding with Alexander Hansen. I was quick to submit an update to SBCL because of an packaging problem with SBLC unrelated to (x)maxima. Jesse On Jan 17, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I've grown accustomed to the less than elegant way in which I have to manually purge, rebuild, and reinstall maxima every time sbcl gets updated, but it appears that this time the process failed. If you've got a better way to handle it let me know. As best as we can tell maxima has to be depend on a particular version-revision of whatever LISP is used. And we don't use a = versioning because we can't assume people are going to use 'update-all'; it wouldn't do to have a maxima which was built on an earlier sbcl than what is currently on the system. I just updated and installed the new sbcl and now maxima refuses to build. Technical information follows sig. Sean fink -V Package manager version: 0.29.10 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Sat Jan 16 16:18:35 2010, 10.6, x86_64 sbcl-1.0.34-1 maxima-5.20.1-2 error text: sudo fink install maxima xmaxima Information about 7994 packages read in 2 seconds. Can't resolve dependency sbcl (= 1.0.33-1) for package maxima-5.20.1-2 (no matching packages/versions found) Exiting with failure. This was released without the coordination that we require in this circumstance. We are supposed to coordinate updates to sbcl and maxima when either the version, revision, or both are changed; I received no email about this. I'll see about working up an updated package description. - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAktTQ9IACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ/3PgCdHIMRjYPJh4zIR0bhAcSkNvpq StAAmIpXB0a5KO3icaBU3kKu85BfvuM= =Gnqp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl update breaks maxima, xmaxima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I've grown accustomed to the less than elegant way in which I have to manually purge, rebuild, and reinstall maxima every time sbcl gets updated, but it appears that this time the process failed. If you've got a better way to handle it let me know. As best as we can tell maxima has to be depend on a particular version-revision of whatever LISP is used. And we don't use a = versioning because we can't assume people are going to use 'update-all'; it wouldn't do to have a maxima which was built on an earlier sbcl than what is currently on the system. I just updated and installed the new sbcl and now maxima refuses to build. Technical information follows sig. Sean fink -V Package manager version: 0.29.10 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Sat Jan 16 16:18:35 2010, 10.6, x86_64 sbcl-1.0.34-1 maxima-5.20.1-2 error text: sudo fink install maxima xmaxima Information about 7994 packages read in 2 seconds. Can't resolve dependency sbcl (= 1.0.33-1) for package maxima-5.20.1-2 (no matching packages/versions found) Exiting with failure. This was released without the coordination that we require in this circumstance. We are supposed to coordinate updates to sbcl and maxima when either the version, revision, or both are changed; I received no email about this. I'll see about working up an updated package description. - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAktTQ9IACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ/3PgCdHIMRjYPJh4zIR0bhAcSkNvpq StAAmIpXB0a5KO3icaBU3kKu85BfvuM= =Gnqp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl update breaks maxima, xmaxima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sean, Alex, I think I'm the root of the problem here -- I recently submitted an updated SBCL, bumping the version from 1.0.33 to 1.0.34, without corresponding with Alexander Hansen. I was quick to submit an update to SBCL because of an packaging problem with SBLC unrelated to (x)maxima. Jesse It's fixed now. The issue is that maxima has a very strict versioned dependency, and therefore will immediately gripe if sbcl is updated and maxima is not done so simultaneously. - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktTZ1EACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ+9BACeLP2+qVlYmk3Xhvn/FmgckTCk tkYAnA/SVSw0/i9jpmeYb4/gRWLPdYI6 =xqmv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
On 30 Jan 2009, at 06:26, Alexander Hansen wrote: How should we implement this in the package description from the tracker? My previous msg was chiefly to encourage the maintainers to raise the (three) bootstrapping issues upstream.. It seems more than likely to be harmless, IMHO, so that we could just try to ignore it. [ run-tests finishes normally _ and identically _ in both cases : Finished running tests. Status: Expected failure:float.pure.lisp / (SCALE-FLOAT-OVERFLOW BUG-372) Expected failure:float.pure.lisp / (ADDITION-OVERFLOW BUG-372) Expected failure:debug.impure.lisp / (UNDEFINED-FUNCTION BUG-353) Expected failure:debug.impure.lisp / (THROW NO-SUCH-TAG) Expected failure:external-format.impure.lisp / (CHARACTER- DECODE-LARGE FORCE-END-OF- FILE) Expected failure:packages.impure.lisp / USE-PACKAGE-CONFLICT-SET Expected failure:packages.impure.lisp / IMPORT-SINGLE-CONFLICT ok //apparent success (reached end of run-tests.sh normally) ] If we want nevertheless to be a bit paranoiac, (costs only a couple of mins of additional build-time..), one can just insert the required lines to do a re-build in the InstallScript ; something like : InstallScript: find %b -type d -name CVS -depth -exec rm -rf {} \; find %b -type f -name .cvsignore -depth -exec rm -f {} \; unset SBCL_HOME ; INSTALL_ROOT=%i sh install.sh sh make.sh %i/bin/sbcl \ --core %i/lib/sbcl/sbcl.core \ --disable-debugger --no-sysinit --no-userinit find %b -type f -name a.out -depth -exec rm -f {} \; cd tests sh run-tests.sh unset SBCL_HOME ; INSTALL_ROOT=%i sh install.sh mv %i/bin/sbcl %i/lib/sbcl/sbcl echo '#! /bin/sh' %i/bin/sbcl echo 'SBCL_HOME=%p/lib/sbcl/ exec %p/lib/sbcl/sbcl $@' %i/ bin/sbcl chmod 755 %i/bin/sbcl (the line cd tests sh run-tests.sh should go into a TestScript though ..) Best, JF -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 28 Jan 2009, at 03:34, Jean-François Mertens wrote: It is OK _ modulo fixing the Source2-MD5 to 3b222a1f945ca462a2884fc378362c33 Still a small problem _ a paranoiac might want do a second build, with as bootstrap binary that of the first _: after the initial build I get 25595932 as size of %p/lib/sbcl/sbcl.core, and the second time 25587740 (which is then a fixed point..). In principle, the final output should be a fixed point, independent of what was used for bootstrapping... This seems a third reason calling for an additional bootstrapping step, in addition to - the second FIXME in make.sh - getting the bootstrap to work well with clisp and openmcl Could the maintainers raise this (those 3) issue upstream? JF Mertens How should we implement this in the package description from the tracker? (I'm regretting having moved maxima away from CLISP) -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
On 28 Jan 2009, at 03:34, Jean-François Mertens wrote: It is OK _ modulo fixing the Source2-MD5 to 3b222a1f945ca462a2884fc378362c33 Still a small problem _ a paranoiac might want do a second build, with as bootstrap binary that of the first _: after the initial build I get 25595932 as size of %p/lib/sbcl/sbcl.core, and the second time 25587740 (which is then a fixed point..). In principle, the final output should be a fixed point, independent of what was used for bootstrapping... This seems a third reason calling for an additional bootstrapping step, in addition to - the second FIXME in make.sh - getting the bootstrap to work well with clisp and openmcl Could the maintainers raise this (those 3) issue upstream? JF Mertens -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
It was updated a while ago. On Jan 27, 2009, at 1:22 AM, Moritz Kaiser wrote: Alexander Hansen schrieb: Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:44, Alexander Hansen wrote: [...] I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match; Of course. Should just involve version changes (tomorrow I may get my intel back ftom repair _ but can't check today,..) JF I just committed the Intel and PowerPC updates along with the required maxima update. Are there any news regarding the Intel version of sbcl? It still crashes during compile on my intel mac book, with 10.4.11 ---8-*snip* sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core ../ sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger --no- sysinit --no-userinit //starting build: Tue Jan 27 03:01:29 CET 2009 //SBCL_XC_HOST=../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core ../ sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger --no- sysinit --no-userinit //entering make-config.sh //ensuring the existence of output/ directory //initializing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local- target-features.lisp-expr //guessing default target CPU architecture from host architecture //setting up CPU-architecture-dependent information sbcl_arch=x86 //setting up symlink src/compiler/target //setting up symlink src/assembly/target //setting up symlink src/compiler/assembly //setting up OS-dependent information //finishing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local- target-features.lisp-expr /in canonicalize-whitespace-1 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./tests/test-status.lisp- expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/ runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/ target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.2527.tmp //entering make-host-1.sh //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis make-host-1.sh: line 31: 2538 Bus error $SBCL_XC_HOST make-host-1.lisp ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1 ---8*snap* I'll cc the maintainer of the Intel packaging. Unfortunately I can't test this myself, since my Intel machine can't run 10.4 . -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 27 Jan 2009, at 07:22, Moritz Kaiser wrote: Alexander Hansen schrieb: Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:44, Alexander Hansen wrote: [...] I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match; Of course. Should just involve version changes (tomorrow I may get my intel back ftom repair _ but can't check today,..) JF I just committed the Intel and PowerPC updates along with the required maxima update. Are there any news regarding the Intel version of sbcl? It still crashes during compile on my intel mac book, with 10.4.11 ---8-*snip* sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger --no-sysinit --no-userinit //starting build: Tue Jan 27 03:01:29 CET 2009 //SBCL_XC_HOST=../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger --no-sysinit --no-userinit //entering make-config.sh //ensuring the existence of output/ directory //initializing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local-target-features.lisp-expr //guessing default target CPU architecture from host architecture //setting up CPU-architecture-dependent information sbcl_arch=x86 //setting up symlink src/compiler/target //setting up symlink src/assembly/target //setting up symlink src/compiler/assembly //setting up OS-dependent information //finishing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local-target-features.lisp-expr /in canonicalize-whitespace-1 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./tests/test-status.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.2527.tmp //entering make-host-1.sh //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis make-host-1.sh: line 31: 2538 Bus error $SBCL_XC_HOST make-host-1.lisp ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1 ---8*snap* Right , had the same here. As we had noticed, the 1.023 binaries were broken on 10.4, but for some unknown reason, the correction _ to use the 1.02 binaries _ was done only for ppc's. Here follows the fix I used, which you can too if you have some version of sbcl installed: diff -r1.11 sbcl-i386.info 29,30c29 sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl \ --core ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core \ --- sh make.sh %p/bin/sbcl \ Or you can just take the ppc info file: copy sbcl-powerpc.info to sbcl-i386.info, and change the architecture field from powerpc to i386 JF Mertens I'll redirect this on to the sbcl-intel maintainer. When we tried just copying/modifying the powerpc package description for the prior version of the package, a problem apparently showed up. -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
On 27 Jan 2009, at 07:22, Moritz Kaiser wrote: Alexander Hansen schrieb: Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:44, Alexander Hansen wrote: [...] I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match; Of course. Should just involve version changes (tomorrow I may get my intel back ftom repair _ but can't check today,..) JF I just committed the Intel and PowerPC updates along with the required maxima update. Are there any news regarding the Intel version of sbcl? It still crashes during compile on my intel mac book, with 10.4.11 ---8-*snip* sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core ../ sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger --no- sysinit --no-userinit //starting build: Tue Jan 27 03:01:29 CET 2009 //SBCL_XC_HOST=../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl -- core ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger --no-sysinit --no-userinit //entering make-config.sh //ensuring the existence of output/ directory //initializing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local- target-features.lisp-expr //guessing default target CPU architecture from host architecture //setting up CPU-architecture-dependent information sbcl_arch=x86 //setting up symlink src/compiler/target //setting up symlink src/assembly/target //setting up symlink src/compiler/assembly //setting up OS-dependent information //finishing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local- target-features.lisp-expr /in canonicalize-whitespace-1 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./tests/test-status.lisp- expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/ runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/ target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.2527.tmp //entering make-host-1.sh //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis make-host-1.sh: line 31: 2538 Bus error $SBCL_XC_HOST make-host-1.lisp ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1 ---8*snap* Right , had the same here. As we had noticed, the 1.023 binaries were broken on 10.4, but for some unknown reason, the correction _ to use the 1.02 binaries _ was done only for ppc's. Here follows the fix I used, which you can too if you have some version of sbcl installed: diff -r1.11 sbcl-i386.info 29,30c29 sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl \ --core ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core \ --- sh make.sh %p/bin/sbcl \ Or you can just take the ppc info file: copy sbcl-powerpc.info to sbcl-i386.info, and change the architecture field from powerpc to i386 JF Mertens -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
On 27 Jan 2009, at 16:38, Alexander Hansen wrote: I'll redirect this on to the sbcl-intel maintainer. When we tried just copying/modifying the powerpc package description for the prior version of the package, a problem apparently showed up. In particular, in Source2, powerpc -- x86 ... JF -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Jean-François Mertens jean-francois.mert...@uclouvain.be writes: On 27 Jan 2009, at 16:38, Alexander Hansen wrote: I'll redirect this on to the sbcl-intel maintainer. When we tried just copying/modifying the powerpc package description for the prior version of the package, a problem apparently showed up. In particular, in Source2, powerpc -- x86 ... OK, I've resubmitted the sbcl-i386.info to use 1.0.2 for bootstrapping, rather than 1.0.23. Jesse -- Jesse Alama (al...@stanford.edu) -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Jesse Alama wrote: Jean-François Mertens jean-francois.mert...@uclouvain.be writes: On 27 Jan 2009, at 16:38, Alexander Hansen wrote: I'll redirect this on to the sbcl-intel maintainer. When we tried just copying/modifying the powerpc package description for the prior version of the package, a problem apparently showed up. In particular, in Source2, powerpc -- x86 ... OK, I've resubmitted the sbcl-i386.info to use 1.0.2 for bootstrapping, rather than 1.0.23. Jesse Sounds good. I'd love it if somebody on 10.4/Intel could try it out. -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
On 27 Jan 2009, at 23:24, Alexander Hansen wrote: Jesse Alama wrote: Jean-François Mertens jean-francois.mert...@uclouvain.be writes: On 27 Jan 2009, at 16:38, Alexander Hansen wrote: I'll redirect this on to the sbcl-intel maintainer. When we tried just copying/modifying the powerpc package description for the prior version of the package, a problem apparently showed up. In particular, in Source2, powerpc -- x86 ... OK, I've resubmitted the sbcl-i386.info to use 1.0.2 for bootstrapping, rather than 1.0.23. Jesse Sounds good. I'd love it if somebody on 10.4/Intel could try it out. It is OK _ modulo fixing the Source2-MD5 to 3b222a1f945ca462a2884fc378362c33 JF -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Alexander Hansen schrieb: Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:44, Alexander Hansen wrote: [...] I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match; Of course. Should just involve version changes (tomorrow I may get my intel back ftom repair _ but can't check today,..) JF I just committed the Intel and PowerPC updates along with the required maxima update. Are there any news regarding the Intel version of sbcl? It still crashes during compile on my intel mac book, with 10.4.11 ---8-*snip* sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger --no-sysinit --no-userinit //starting build: Tue Jan 27 03:01:29 CET 2009 //SBCL_XC_HOST=../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core ../sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/output/sbcl.core --disable-debugger --no-sysinit --no-userinit //entering make-config.sh //ensuring the existence of output/ directory //initializing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local-target-features.lisp-expr //guessing default target CPU architecture from host architecture //setting up CPU-architecture-dependent information sbcl_arch=x86 //setting up symlink src/compiler/target //setting up symlink src/assembly/target //setting up symlink src/compiler/assembly //setting up OS-dependent information //finishing /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.24-2/sbcl-1.0.24/local-target-features.lisp-expr /in canonicalize-whitespace-1 /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./tests/test-status.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.2527.tmp //entering make-host-1.sh //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis make-host-1.sh: line 31: 2538 Bus error $SBCL_XC_HOST make-host-1.lisp ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1 ---8*snap* -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Attached is the latest sbcl-powerpc.info that I've confirmed builds on 10.5.6 on a PowerBook G4 ok. From all of your previous reports, it should build on 10.4.11 correctly also. sbcl-powerpc.info Description: Binary data Leigh -- Leigh M. Smith mailto:le...@leighsmith.com http://www.leighsmith.com skype:aussieleighsmith -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Leigh Smith wrote: Attached is the latest sbcl-powerpc.info that I've confirmed builds on 10.5.6 on a PowerBook G4 ok. From all of your previous reports, it should build on 10.4.11 correctly also. Leigh -- Leigh M. Smith mailto:le...@leighsmith.com http://www.leighsmith.com skype:aussieleighsmith Before anybody commits this, we should verify that it does indeed build on 10.4; and maxima has to be updated concurrently. I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match; since not doing so requires me to have architecture-separated maxima package descriptions. -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:44, Alexander Hansen wrote: Before anybody commits this, we should verify that it does indeed build on 10.4; It does. and maxima has to be updated concurrently. Sure. (maxima builds and works fine with it) Best you do the commit, as maintainer of maxima, to make sure everything is coordinated well. Agreed. I'd also like to see about updating the Intel version to match; Of course. Should just involve version changes (tomorrow I may get my intel back ftom repair _ but can't check today,..) JF I forwarded the original message on to the sbcl-intel maintainer, too (I'd used up my available cc's on my email client so that wasn't indicated in my reply), so with any luck he'll respond promptly. If not, I may have to bite the bullet and go with separate powerpc and i386 package descriptions for maxima. -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
On 16 Jan 2009, at 09:40, Leigh Smith wrote: I've attached a new sbcl-powerpc.info which builds sbcl 1.0.24 on PowerPC MacOS 10.5.6 with gcc 4.0.1 Send me the error log if it doesn't build on 10.4.11 and Xcode 2.5 Didn't even try, since it uses the same 1.0.22 binary that we know is broken on 10.4... But substituting the 1.0.2 binary in Source2, or using my own old sbcl to bootstrap, both give a correct build. As alredy said, pls use the 1.0.2 binary for bootstrapping _ or recreate a source2 working on both 10.4 and 10.5 using 1.0.24; no need to wait that one gets posted on sourceforge (as already said, you can have my deb if needed..) JF Mertens -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Perhaps my email of Jan 16th didn't get through: Begin forwarded message: From: Leigh Smith le...@leighsmith.com Date: 16 January 2009 12:20:17 PM To: Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr Cc: Jean-François Mertens j...@core.ucl.ac.be, Fink Users fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net , Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com, Sean Lake odysseus9...@gmail.com , Sebastián González s.gonza...@uclouvain.be Subject: Re: sbcl Compile Problem ok, thanks for the clarification. As I alluded to in my previous message, the PPC binary 1.0.22 does run on 10.5. One of the most recent changes of 1.0.24 is to allow binaries to run on both 10.4 10.5, so the final solution is to get a 1.0.24 binary posted onto sourceforge so that we don't need two different versions of sbcl- powerpc.info for the two versions. I will post out a new version of sbcl-powerpc.info once I've had a chance to test 1.0.2 with 10.5.6. Leigh Smith wrote: I've attached a new sbcl-powerpc.info which builds sbcl 1.0.24 on PowerPC MacOS 10.5.6 with gcc 4.0.1 Send me the error log if it doesn't build on 10.4.11 and Xcode 2.5 It crashes in exactly the same way as before. This is not surprising, because the crash comes from the precompiled 1.0.22 binary that is used for bootstrapping the new version. And you are still using the same binary as before. Please believe us when we tell you that *this binary does not run* on 10.4. This is not the fault of Fink's package; this thing should not exist on sourceforge. Or maybe if it does run on 10.5 (which I don't know), it should come with instructions to use it only on 10.5. Please use the bootstrap binary from a previous version, for example 1.0.2 which is used in the sbcl-1.0.19-2 package that is in 10.4/stable. I just built your 1.0.24 successfully on 10.4/ppc using the 1.0.2 bootstrap binary. Leigh -- Leigh M. Smith mailto:le...@leighsmith.com http://www.leighsmith.com skype:aussieleighsmith -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
On 19 Jan 2009, at 16:37, Leigh Smith wrote: Perhaps my email of Jan 16th didn't get through: I see .. Sorry. JF -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Leigh Smith wrote: I've attached a new sbcl-powerpc.info which builds sbcl 1.0.24 on PowerPC MacOS 10.5.6 with gcc 4.0.1 Send me the error log if it doesn't build on 10.4.11 and Xcode 2.5 It crashes in exactly the same way as before. This is not surprising, because the crash comes from the precompiled 1.0.22 binary that is used for bootstrapping the new version. And you are still using the same binary as before. Please believe us when we tell you that *this binary does not run* on 10.4. This is not the fault of Fink's package; this thing should not exist on sourceforge. Or maybe if it does run on 10.5 (which I don't know), it should come with instructions to use it only on 10.5. Please use the bootstrap binary from a previous version, for example 1.0.2 which is used in the sbcl-1.0.19-2 package that is in 10.4/stable. I just built your 1.0.24 successfully on 10.4/ppc using the 1.0.2 bootstrap binary. -- Martin -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
I've attached a new sbcl-powerpc.info which builds sbcl 1.0.24 on PowerPC MacOS 10.5.6 with gcc 4.0.1 Send me the error log if it doesn't build on 10.4.11 and Xcode 2.5 sbcl-powerpc.info Description: Binary data Leigh -- Leigh M. Smith mailto:le...@leighsmith.com http://www.leighsmith.com skype:aussieleighsmith -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
ok, thanks for the clarification. As I alluded to in my previous message, the PPC binary 1.0.22 does run on 10.5. One of the most recent changes of 1.0.24 is to allow binaries to run on both 10.4 10.5, so the final solution is to get a 1.0.24 binary posted onto sourceforge so that we don't need two different versions of sbcl- powerpc.info for the two versions. I will post out a new version of sbcl-powerpc.info once I've had a chance to test 1.0.2 with 10.5.6. Leigh Smith wrote: I've attached a new sbcl-powerpc.info which builds sbcl 1.0.24 on PowerPC MacOS 10.5.6 with gcc 4.0.1 Send me the error log if it doesn't build on 10.4.11 and Xcode 2.5 It crashes in exactly the same way as before. This is not surprising, because the crash comes from the precompiled 1.0.22 binary that is used for bootstrapping the new version. And you are still using the same binary as before. Please believe us when we tell you that *this binary does not run* on 10.4. This is not the fault of Fink's package; this thing should not exist on sourceforge. Or maybe if it does run on 10.5 (which I don't know), it should come with instructions to use it only on 10.5. Please use the bootstrap binary from a previous version, for example 1.0.2 which is used in the sbcl-1.0.19-2 package that is in 10.4/ stable. I just built your 1.0.24 successfully on 10.4/ppc using the 1.0.2 bootstrap binary. -- Martin Leigh -- Leigh M. Smith mailto:le...@leighsmith.com http://www.leighsmith.com skype:aussieleighsmith -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
I had the same problem. In addition, trying to bootstrap instead from clisp or from openmcl both failed too. So I had to bootstrap from the existing sbcl binary; the following fix will get users who have already some sbcl installed off the hook : diff -r1.11 sbcl-powerpc.info 26,27c26,27 sh make.sh ../sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl \ --core ../sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin/output/sbcl.core \ --- sh make.sh %p/bin/sbcl \ # --core ../sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin/output/ sbcl.core \ As to the package, if the maintainer doesn't have another solution, I can send him my deb file, which he could then repackage as a Source2 : it seems likely that a bootstrap binary built on 10.4 may work on 10.5 (while from what we're seeing the opposite isn't true). JF Mertens -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Alexander Hansen wrote: [] /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.5606.tmp //entering make-host-1.sh //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis make-host-1.sh: line 31: 5616 Bus error $SBCL_XC_HOST make-host-1.lisp ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1 [] It didn't help. I get the same failure on 10.4/PowerPC with Xcode 2.5. I'll cc the maintainer. It seems this version of sbcl cannot be built from its so-called sources on ppc. The reason is that it uses an older version of itself for compilation, and this older version comes, as a pre-compiled binary, with the sources. The supplied version for ppc crashes with a bus error. It not really possible to find out why, because it is precompiled. The stack trace is Thread 0 Crashed: 0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x9012cab0 _malloc_initialize + 1016 1 libSystem.B.dylib 0x90002fb8 malloc + 48 2 sbcl0xa9bc successful_malloc + 28 3 sbcl0xaa10 copied_string + 32 4 sbcl0xde2c os_get_runtime_executable_path + 76 5 sbcl0xac18 main + 104 6 sbcl0x1f74 start + 68 One could try to make the package builddepend on clisp and try to compile it with clisp, which is a suggested procedure. When I just tried this by hand, it went quite far, but eventually crashed with the error //entering make-target-1.sh //building runtime system and symbol table file GNUmakefile:31: genesis/Makefile.features: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `genesis/Makefile.features'. Stop. So this would need some more porting effort. -- Martin -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr wrote: Alexander Hansen wrote: [] /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.5606.tmp //entering make-host-1.sh //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis make-host-1.sh: line 31: 5616 Bus error $SBCL_XC_HOST make-host-1.lisp ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1 [] It didn't help. I get the same failure on 10.4/PowerPC with Xcode 2.5. I'll cc the maintainer. It seems this version of sbcl cannot be built from its so-called sources on ppc. The reason is that it uses an older version of itself for compilation, and this older version comes, as a pre-compiled binary, with the sources. The supplied version for ppc crashes with a bus error. It not really possible to find out why, because it is precompiled. The stack trace is Thread 0 Crashed: 0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x9012cab0 _malloc_initialize + 1016 1 libSystem.B.dylib 0x90002fb8 malloc + 48 2 sbcl0xa9bc successful_malloc + 28 3 sbcl0xaa10 copied_string + 32 4 sbcl0xde2c os_get_runtime_executable_path + 76 5 sbcl0xac18 main + 104 6 sbcl0x1f74 start + 68 One could try to make the package builddepend on clisp and try to compile it with clisp, which is a suggested procedure. When I just tried this by hand, it went quite far, but eventually crashed with the error //entering make-target-1.sh //building runtime system and symbol table file GNUmakefile:31: genesis/Makefile.features: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `genesis/Makefile.features'. Stop. So this would need some more porting effort. -- Martin That's odd. I have sbcl 1.0.19 installed. An error like that sounds like it should affect all versions. Sean -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
On Jan 14, 2009, at 3:08 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander Hansen wrote: [] /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/ foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.5606.tmp //entering make-host-1.sh //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis make-host-1.sh: line 31: 5616 Bus error $SBCL_XC_HOST make-host-1.lisp ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1 [] It didn't help. I get the same failure on 10.4/PowerPC with Xcode 2.5. I'll cc the maintainer. It seems this version of sbcl cannot be built from its so-called sources on ppc. The reason is that it uses an older version of itself for compilation, and this older version comes, as a pre- compiled binary, with the sources. The supplied version for ppc crashes with a bus error. It not really possible to find out why, because it is precompiled. The stack trace is Thread 0 Crashed: 0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x9012cab0 _malloc_initialize + 1016 1 libSystem.B.dylib 0x90002fb8 malloc + 48 2 sbcl0xa9bc successful_malloc + 28 3 sbcl0xaa10 copied_string + 32 4 sbcl0xde2c os_get_runtime_executable_path + 76 5 sbcl0xac18 main + 104 6 sbcl0x1f74 start + 68 One could try to make the package builddepend on clisp and try to compile it with clisp, which is a suggested procedure. When I just tried this by hand, it went quite far, but eventually crashed with the error //entering make-target-1.sh //building runtime system and symbol table file GNUmakefile:31: genesis/Makefile.features: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `genesis/Makefile.features'. Stop. So this would need some more porting effort. -- Martin Perhaps the bootstrap binary is compiled on 10.5: I _did_ test this on 10.5/PowerPC before adding the .info file to the distribution. I naively assumed that 10.4 would be no problem, since historically I'd had problems with 10.5 rather than 10.4 . -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Sean Lake wrote: [] Thread 0 Crashed: 0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x9012cab0 _malloc_initialize + 1016 1 libSystem.B.dylib 0x90002fb8 malloc + 48 2 sbcl0xa9bc successful_malloc + 28 3 sbcl0xaa10 copied_string + 32 4 sbcl0xde2c os_get_runtime_executable_path + 76 5 sbcl0xac18 main + 104 6 sbcl0x1f74 start + 68 One could try to make the package builddepend on clisp and try to compile it with clisp, which is a suggested procedure. When I just tried this by hand, it went quite far, but eventually crashed with the error //entering make-target-1.sh //building runtime system and symbol table file GNUmakefile:31: genesis/Makefile.features: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `genesis/Makefile.features'. Stop. So this would need some more porting effort. -- Martin That's odd. I have sbcl 1.0.19 installed. An error like that sounds like it should affect all versions. Yes, it looks like a buffer overflow or something, but: I have 1.0.15 installed, which works, and also the version 1.0.2 it uses for bootstrapping works: costabel% /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.15-1/sbcl-1.0.2-powerpc-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --version SBCL 1.0.2 costabel% /sw/bin/sbcl --version SBCL 1.0.15 costabel% /sw/src/fink.build/sbcl-1.0.23-2/sbcl-1.0.22-powerpc-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --version Bus error -- Martin -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
I'll see if I can build SBCL 1.0.24 on PPC tonight and if so, I'll prepare some .info files for updating the fink unstable distribution. Hi all, Unfortunately I no longer have access to PPC machines. For this reason, I asked Leigh Smith some time ago whether he would care to become the maintainer of the package. He has kindly accepted this invitation (his main machine is an Intel but he still has a G4 at hand). Once the new package version of SBCL is submitted, please don't forget to update the maintainer field so that it points to Leigh. If one of you feels eager to become the maintainer, you could still ask him (he's in CC). Sorry I can't help any further in solving this issue with SBCL. Best, Sebastián Leigh -- Leigh M. Smith mailto:le...@leighsmith.com http://www.leighsmith.com skype:aussieleighsmith -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
Hi all, Unfortunately I no longer have access to PPC machines. For this reason, I asked Leigh Smith some time ago whether he would care to become the maintainer of the package. He has kindly accepted this invitation (his main machine is an Intel but he still has a G4 at hand). Once the new package version of SBCL is submitted, please don't forget to update the maintainer field so that it points to Leigh. If one of you feels eager to become the maintainer, you could still ask him (he's in CC). Sorry I can't help any further in solving this issue with SBCL. Best, Sebastián On 14 Jan 2009, at 04:57, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:40 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Sean Lake wrote: Hello all, sbcl version 1.0.23-2 is failing to build. The error is: /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.5606.tmp //entering make-host-1.sh //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis make-host-1.sh: line 31: 5616 Bus error $SBCL_XC_HOST make-host-1.lisp ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1 The result of fink --version is: Package manager version: 0.28.6 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Tue Jan 13 18:47:59 2009, 10.4, powerpc More details: Mac OS X 10.4.11 on an iBook PPC G4 800 with 640 MB RAM, Xcode 2.4.1 Should I update Xcode? Would that help, or just burn up time as I recompile everything? Thanks, Sean You wouldn't need to recompile everything. Once something's built it's built, so all of your existing packages would be safe. I've already got Xcode 2.5 on my Tiger setup, so I can try that (I didn't do a 10.4 test before committing sbcl-1.0.23). It didn't help. I get the same failure on 10.4/PowerPC with Xcode 2.5. I'll cc the maintainer. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem
On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:40 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Sean Lake wrote: Hello all, sbcl version 1.0.23-2 is failing to build. The error is: /$*=./local-target-features.lisp-expr ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c ./contrib/sb-posix/foo.c ./src/runtime/target-arch-os.h ./src/runtime/target-arch.h ./src/runtime/target-lispregs.h ./src/runtime/target-os.h /$scratchfilename=/tmp/canonicalize-whitespace-1.5606.tmp //entering make-host-1.sh //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis make-host-1.sh: line 31: 5616 Bus error $SBCL_XC_HOST make-host-1.lisp ### execution of sh failed, exit code 1 The result of fink --version is: Package manager version: 0.28.6 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Tue Jan 13 18:47:59 2009, 10.4, powerpc More details: Mac OS X 10.4.11 on an iBook PPC G4 800 with 640 MB RAM, Xcode 2.4.1 Should I update Xcode? Would that help, or just burn up time as I recompile everything? Thanks, Sean You wouldn't need to recompile everything. Once something's built it's built, so all of your existing packages would be safe. I've already got Xcode 2.5 on my Tiger setup, so I can try that (I didn't do a 10.4 test before committing sbcl-1.0.23). It didn't help. I get the same failure on 10.4/PowerPC with Xcode 2.5. I'll cc the maintainer. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
On Friday 25 January 2008 12:50:09 pm Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Mark J. Reed wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1. While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1: (0)wazowski sbcl This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t) ProductName:Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.5.1 BuildVersion: 9B18 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0 * This is why I like to have both systems installed. Used to have fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again... That's a good sign: if a Macports port of a package exists, that usually means we can make a Fink version; the reverse is also true. It'll probably just take some ironing out of dependencies and ensuring that all files are installed in policy-compliant locations. Fink's sbcl has just been updated to 1.10.14 -- it works on Leopard, -- Alexander K. Hansen akh AT finkproject DOT org Fink User Liaison and Documenter - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Friday 25 January 2008 12:50:09 pm Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Mark J. Reed wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1. While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1: (0)wazowski sbcl This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t) ProductName:Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.5.1 BuildVersion: 9B18 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0 * This is why I like to have both systems installed. Used to have fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again... That's a good sign: if a Macports port of a package exists, that usually means we can make a Fink version; the reverse is also true. It'll probably just take some ironing out of dependencies and ensuring that all files are installed in policy-compliant locations. Fink's sbcl has just been updated to 1.10.14 -- it works on Leopard, Well, that's really great to hear!!! Thanks for your efforts, I shall consider to switch back to fink ;-) Cheers, /nm - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
Mark J. Reed wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen MÃŒller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1. While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1: (0)wazowski sbcl This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t) ProductName:Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.5.1 BuildVersion: 9B18 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0 * This is why I like to have both systems installed. Used to have fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again... I got it working!!! $ port search sbcl sbcl lang/sbcl 1.0.13 The Steel Bank Common Lisp system [~] $ sudo port install sbcl Password: Portfile changed since last build; discarding previous state. --- Fetching sbcl --- Attempting to fetch sbcl-1.0.13-source.tar.bz2 from http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sbcl --- Verifying checksum(s) for sbcl --- Extracting sbcl --- Applying patches to sbcl --- Configuring sbcl --- Building sbcl with target all --- Staging sbcl into destroot --- Installing sbcl 1.0.13_0+test --- Activating sbcl 1.0.13_0+test --- Cleaning sbcl [~] $ sbcl This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * GREAT! Thanks to all again! Cheers, /nm - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
Mark J. Reed wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1. While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1: (0)wazowski sbcl This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t) ProductName:Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.5.1 BuildVersion: 9B18 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0 * This is why I like to have both systems installed. Used to have fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again... That's a good sign: if a Macports port of a package exists, that usually means we can make a Fink version; the reverse is also true. It'll probably just take some ironing out of dependencies and ensuring that all files are installed in policy-compliant locations. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1. While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1: (0)wazowski sbcl This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t) ProductName:Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.5.1 BuildVersion: 9B18 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0 * This is why I like to have both systems installed. Used to have fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again... - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
Just type sudo port install sbcl On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Normen Müller wrote: Mark J. Reed wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1. While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1: (0)wazowski sbcl This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t) ProductName:Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.5.1 BuildVersion: 9B18 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0 * This is why I like to have both systems installed. Used to have fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again... He Mark, I am completely new to MacPorts, sorry. How do I get the latest version of sbcl? The ``port search sbcl'' command gives me ``sbcl lang/sbcl 1.0.12 The Steel Bank Common''. I checked my MacPorts version by ``sudo port selfupdate'' which returned ``MacPorts base version 1.600 installed''. Any help would be appreciated. Cheers, /nm - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
Mark J. Reed wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1. While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1: (0)wazowski sbcl This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t) ProductName:Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.5.1 BuildVersion: 9B18 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0 * This is why I like to have both systems installed. Used to have fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again... He Mark, I am completely new to MacPorts, sorry. How do I get the latest version of sbcl? The ``port search sbcl'' command gives me ``sbcl lang/sbcl 1.0.12 The Steel Bank Common''. I checked my MacPorts version by ``sudo port selfupdate'' which returned ``MacPorts base version 1.600 installed''. Any help would be appreciated. Cheers, /nm - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
Mark J. Reed wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen MÃŒller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1. While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1: (0)wazowski sbcl This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t) ProductName:Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.5.1 BuildVersion: 9B18 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0 * This is why I like to have both systems installed. Used to have fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again... Thanks a lot for pointing me to MacPorts!!! I will try it asap and post my feedback to this thread. Cheers, /nm - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
Normen Mueller wrote: Mark J. Reed wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 4:13 AM, Normen MÃŒller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1. While waiting for fink to catch up, I note that MacPorts has sbcl 1.0.13 working on 10.5.1: (0)wazowski sbcl This is SBCL 1.0.13, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. More information about SBCL is available at http://www.sbcl.org/. SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the distribution for more information. * (sb-ext:run-program /usr/bin/sw_vers nil :output t) ProductName:Mac OS X ProductVersion: 10.5.1 BuildVersion: 9B18 #SB-IMPL::PROCESS :EXITED 0 * This is why I like to have both systems installed. Used to have fink's sbcl and MacPorts' clisp, now it's the other way around; after the next update to either package or the OS it may swap again... Thanks a lot for pointing me to MacPorts!!! I will try it asap and post my feedback to this thread. Cheers, /nm A word of caution: be careful when building packages in such cases. You can wind up with Macports packages linking to Fink libraries, and vice versa. This can cause problems for you down the road when you change things via updates, removals, ... - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
On Jan 25, 2008 11:55 AM, Alexander Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A word of caution: be careful when building packages in such cases. You can wind up with Macports packages linking to Fink libraries, and vice versa. This can cause problems for you down the road when you change things via updates, removals, ... This shouldn't be a problem in general. Each system lives in a separate part of the filesystem and keeps its own track of dependencies, so instead of cross-links what you get is multiple copies of common files such as the readline library. But an experimental/unstable (or just broken) port might have a dependency that doesn't get included as such at the package level, leaving the build-time configure script to hunt it down on its own - in that case, it might find something installed by the other system. I haven't run into this yet in practice. One way to avoid it would be to wrap the fink and port commands so they have a clean room shell environment, e.g. alias fink=env -i /sw/bin/fink alias port=env -i /opt/local/bin/port If you find that they need some environment variables set, you can add them, e.g. alias port=env -i LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/local/lib /opt/local/bin/port but so far that doesn't seem to be necessary. -- Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
On Jan 25, 2008 4:07 PM, Richard E. Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just type sudo port install sbcl Should take this offlist, as it's not on-topic for a fink list... But how to install it wasn't Normen's issue; he got that far. His concern was that the version he saw was 1.0.12 whereas the one I pasted from was 1.0.13. Since 1.0.13 is also what's listed on the website (for both i386 and ppc), I suggested a sudo port -d sync. -- Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
Sorry I didn't see that. When I did sudo port sbcl I got the 1.0.13 On Jan 25, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Mark J. Reed wrote: On Jan 25, 2008 4:07 PM, Richard E. Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just type sudo port install sbcl Should take this offlist, as it's not on-topic for a fink list... But how to install it wasn't Normen's issue; he got that far. His concern was that the version he saw was 1.0.12 whereas the one I pasted from was 1.0.13. Since 1.0.13 is also what's listed on the website (for both i386 and ppc), I suggested a sudo port -d sync. -- Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
On Thursday 24 January 2008 01:33:24 am you wrote: Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Wednesday 23 January 2008 09:58:01 Normen Müller wrote: Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Wednesday 23 January 2008 04:13:35 Normen Müller wrote: Dear all, I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1. Has no one any interests to get this package running? Any other suggestions? Cheers, /nm It's available on 10.5: http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/sbcl If you're on an Intel box you probably need to enable the unstable tree, which you should be able to do via fink configure, and run a selfupdate with rsync or cvs. Dear Alexander, first of all thanks for fast reply! I am not on a Intel box, but have the last generation of ``real'' Macs ;-) If I perform an ``fink apropos sbcl'' I get the following output: Information about 6505 packages read in 1 seconds. sbcl 1.0.5-1 ANSI Common Lisp implementation This version, however, does not compile on my machine. As I am a dumb fink user, could you please advice me what I have to modify in my fink configuration in to get sbcl under the above mentioned URL running? Cheers, /nm You're going to have to provide some build output, so that we can see _how_ the failure occurs. Dear Alexander, please find attached my terminal saved output after trying to compile sbcl. Hopefully you may indentify where the problem is... Thanks again for your help! Cheers, /nm Sending this back to the mailing list, as this isn't my package: ... //entering make-target-1.sh //building runtime system and symbol table file rm -f *.[do] sbcl sbcl.nm sbcl.h core *.tmp # the depend file is obsolete rm -f depend echo '#include genesis/config.h' sbcl.h echo '#include genesis/constants.h' sbcl.h gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp -c -o alloc.o alloc.c alloc.c: In function 'pa_alloc': alloc.c:64: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast alloc.c:70: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast alloc.c:43: warning: unused variable 'th' gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp -c -o backtrace.o backtrace.c gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp -c -o breakpoint.o breakpoint.c gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp -c -o coreparse.o coreparse.c gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp -c -o dynbind.o dynbind.c gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp -c -o funcall.o funcall.c gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp -c -o gc-common.o gc-common.c gc-common.c: In function 'maybe_gc': gc-common.c:2472: warning: implicit declaration of function 'check_gc_signals_unblocked_or_lose' gc-common.c:2475: warning: implicit declaration of function 'unblock_gc_signals' gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp -c -o globals.o globals.c gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp -c -o interr.o interr.c gcc -g -Wall -O2 -fdollars-in-identifiers -I. -no-cpp-precomp -c -o interrupt.o interrupt.c interrupt.c: In function 'maybe_now_maybe_later': interrupt.c:727: error: 'struct __darwin_mcontext' has no member named 'ss' interrupt.c: In function 'low_level_maybe_now_maybe_later': interrupt.c:757: error: 'struct __darwin_mcontext' has no member named 'ss' interrupt.c: In function 'interrupt_handle_now_handler': interrupt.c:831: error: 'struct __darwin_mcontext' has no member named 'ss' make: *** [interrupt.o] Error 1 I get an identical failure (10.5.1 powerPC). -- Alexander K. Hansen akh AT finkproject DOT org Fink User Liaison and Documenter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] sbcl
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 04:13:35 Normen Müller wrote: Dear all, I am still waiting to get sbcl running on Mac OS X 10.5.1. Has no one any interests to get this package running? Any other suggestions? Cheers, /nm It's available on 10.5: http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/sbcl If you're on an Intel box you probably need to enable the unstable tree, which you should be able to do via fink configure, and run a selfupdate with rsync or cvs. -- Alexander K. Hansen akh AT finkproject DOT org Fink User Liaison and Documenter - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users