Re: [Firebird-devel] Warnings
On 06/14/12 18:38, Vlad Khorsun wrote: Is it enough to agree that keeping warnings in our API is the only correct solution? I, personally, prefer to have warnings, but, probably it should be delivered not using status-vector. If we can produce and deliver many warnings per statement (or per API call) it will be the best, as for me. From SQL2008: If a condition is raised that causes a statement to have no effect other than that associated with raising the condition (that is, not a completion condition), then the condition is said to be an exception condition or exception. If a condition is raised that permits a statement to have an effect other than that associated with raising the condition (corresponding to an SQLSTATE class value of successful completion, warning, or no data), then the condition is said to be a completion condition. Here I want to pay an attention - we already return no_data completion condition not in status vector. Therefore on my mind nothing prevents us from returning warnings also not in it. May be we should add some more functions to IStatus to check not for exceptions, but also for warning and no_data? To separate warnings from exceptions and to have single interface to check statement conditions? -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Re: [Firebird-devel] Warnings
On 14/06/2012 09:23, Mark Rotteveel wrote: On 14-6-2012 12:50, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: On 14/06/2012 06:13, Alex Peshkoff wrote: For me this looks like regression, sorry. If you talking about specific subject about warning removal, I'd instead call it let bad legacy and non-feature interfere with new design for no reason. Are you saying warnings are useless, or just the way they are currently implemented? Current (and current means all Firebird history time) it was useless, decided to continue being as it, and never wished to be improved. But as soon as I try to remove it, it's now the beloved and standard feature... Adriano -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[Firebird-devel] incomplete crash report
The instructions I see for getting stack-traces all involve Dr. Watson, which isn't available anymore. I've found other apps, but they're finnicky and only seem useful to me if I'm diagnosing a reproducible, short- term crash in FB (I think I've submitted at least one stack-trace from that in the recent past, it was a known issue, and the reason for switching to the current build we use?) Do we have updated documentation on capturing useful crash dumps from W2k8+, on a continuous basis? http://www.ibphoenix.com/resources/documents/development/doc_35 Please read. Regards Paul -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Re: [Firebird-devel] incomplete crash report
-- Original Message --- From: Paul Beach pbe...@ibphoenix.com http://www.ibphoenix.com/resources/documents/development/doc_35 --- End of Original Message --- I've also (just now) followed the instructions at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb787181(v=vs.85).aspx for setting up mini-dumps on a per-process basis. Any experience with that? It's some of the same settings as mentioned at the bottom of the WER article, linked- to from the bottom of the 2k8 article, linked-to from the top of your link -- but condensed and explained as a separate topic (forest vs. trees) Might be a few weeks before I can get you a mini-dump, sorry. -Philip -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
