[Firebird-devel] Test (please ignore)
Test (please ignore) -- Mark Rotteveel Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[Firebird-devel] test
TEST Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[Firebird-devel] Test, please ignore.
Foo... Bar... Baz! Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Re: [Firebird-devel] test
On 17-2-2019 18:36, liviuslivius wrote: test message, because i have send two emails 16.02.2019 23:12 and 16.02.2019 23:27 but i still do see them on the group I have them in my mailbox now, it looks like they were stuck for almost a day within SourceForge: Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gvQuC-0007dD-7m; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:11:08 + Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gv8Cx-0008Ne-6p for firebird-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 22:13:15 + Probably some kind of outage. The host name change between these hops suggests that maybe mail queues had to be manually moved between servers (although it is also possible this is just a multi-homed host). Mark -- Mark Rotteveel Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[Firebird-devel] test
test message, because i have send two emails 16.02.2019 23:12 and 16.02.2019 23:27 but i still do see them on the group regards, Karol Bieniaszewski Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[Firebird-devel] Test
Test, please ignore -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Re: [Firebird-devel] Test - please ignore
Test 2 -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[Firebird-devel] Test - please ignore
. -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[Firebird-devel] test
test -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[Firebird-devel] test
Ignore please Vlad -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Re: [Firebird-devel] Test bugs.core_3554 randomly fails
On 06/17/2016 07:11 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 17.06.2016 17:58, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: >> Or perhaps do such a check in the remote client, or even better in the >> Y-valve? > In this case the test will fail always. > > Tests are also fixed sometimes ;) -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohomanageengine Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Re: [Firebird-devel] Test bugs.core_3554 randomly fails
17.06.2016 17:58, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > Or perhaps do such a check in the remote client, or even better in the > Y-valve? In this case the test will fail always. -- WBR, SD. -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohomanageengine Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Re: [Firebird-devel] Test bugs.core_3554 randomly fails
17.06.2016 17:13, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > > As most of you know, when routine protocol.cpp:alloc_cstring() receives zero > length, it > behaves differently, depending on previous allocations. In some cases it > returns pointer > to zero-length string, in some - NULL pointer. > Because of this, used in subj test query "EXECUTE STATEMENT ''" can throw > different > errors. If the routine has returned NULL, user will get code 335544608 from > Y-valve, > otherwise it will be set of 335544569, 335544436, 335544851 from DSQL. > In first case the test will fail, as it always expects the second case. > > Is it a problem in the test or in the server? Wouldn't it be better to check for empty SQL string earlier, inside ExecStatementNode::execute(), and throw error directly from there, before passing it through the layers? Or perhaps do such a check in the remote client, or even better in the Y-valve? Dmitry -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohomanageengine Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[Firebird-devel] Test bugs.core_3554 randomly fails
Hello, all. As most of you know, when routine protocol.cpp:alloc_cstring() receives zero length, it behaves differently, depending on previous allocations. In some cases it returns pointer to zero-length string, in some - NULL pointer. Because of this, used in subj test query "EXECUTE STATEMENT ''" can throw different errors. If the routine has returned NULL, user will get code 335544608 from Y-valve, otherwise it will be set of 335544569, 335544436, 335544851 from DSQL. In first case the test will fail, as it always expects the second case. Is it a problem in the test or in the server? -- WBR, SD. -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohomanageengine Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
