Re: [Firebird-docs] Reference page Page reorg

2014-09-05 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Hi all,

>> I've got a suggestion from Lukas Eder for reference manuals page
>>
>> Maybe it needs a little reorg and cleanup
>>
>> https://twitter.com/lukaseder/status/502724453714124800
>>
>> some documents can be put at the bottom or in another area
>
> I agree. Especially the docs on no longer supported versions should be moved 
> further down.
> Same for stuff that hasn't been updated for ages or on which work has stalled 
> (like Using Firebird, which is 'Work in (non-)progress" since 2007 or so).
>
> Let's keep the 2.1 and 2.5 docs on top, together with - or followed by - 
> material that isn't version-specific and is still useful for current versions.

OK, I cleaned up that page.

- On top are the most important version-specific docs for the currently 
supported versions, i.e. 2.5 and 2.1 Quick Start Guides and LangRef Updates.

- After that, the Command Line Utilities manuals, followed by other user 
manuals, reference material and the Firebird licenses.

- Then come the manuals on no longer supported versions, the IB6 manuals, and 
finally the manuals for Firebird docwriters.

I'm sure we can still do better, by integrating some of the docs pages and 
using only one line per document (with the available language links listed like 
we used to, e.g. "en fr de nl"), which saves a lot of vertical scrolling, but 
that's for another day.


Cheers,
Paul Vinkenoog

--
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
___
Firebird-docs mailing list
Firebird-docs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-docs


Re: [Firebird-docs] Reference page Page reorg

2014-08-24 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Marius wrote:

> I've got a suggestion from Lukas Eder for reference manuals page
>
> Maybe it needs a little reorg and cleanup
>
> https://twitter.com/lukaseder/status/502724453714124800
> 
> some documents can be put at the bottom or in another area

I agree. Especially the docs on no longer supported versions should be moved 
further down.
Same for stuff that hasn't been updated for ages or on which work has stalled 
(like Using Firebird, which is 'Work in (non-)progress" since 2007 or so).

Let's keep the 2.1 and 2.5 docs on top, together with - or followed by - 
material that isn't version-specific and is still useful for current versions.

Any other opinions?


Cheers,
Paul

--
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
___
Firebird-docs mailing list
Firebird-docs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-docs


[Firebird-docs] Reference page Page reorg

2014-08-22 Thread marius adrian popa
I've got a suggestion from Lukas Eder for reference manuals page

Maybe it needs a little reorg and cleanup

https://twitter.com/lukaseder/status/502724453714124800

some documents can be put at the bottom or in another area

for example Interbase and Firebird coexistance/ FB 1.0 GSG can be
moved to Archive/Older docs category

--
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
___
Firebird-docs mailing list
Firebird-docs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-docs