[Ticket #11] [firebird-support] Questions about nbackup

2014-03-07 Thread Desarrollo
This is a notification from the Help Desk.




On Mar 07, 2014 @ 03:24 pm, a...@ib-aid.com wrote:
Hello,
>
> I have been looking into switching from gbak to nbackup. From what I 
> have read about nbackup I am left with some, possibly incorrect, 
> impressions.
>
> 1) nbackup is a page level backup rather than a row-by-row backup like 
> gbak.
> 2) nbackup does no integrity checking of the database as it is backed 
> up. It simply copies the database page by page.
> 3) If 2) is true, then this would seem to imply that I could back up a 
> corrupted database using nbackup without ever knowing that the 
> database was corrupt.
> 4) If 2) & 3) are true this would seem to imply that I could restore a 
> corrupted database using nbackup and wind up with a corrupted 
> database, the same as the original.
>
In general, you are right.
Read this presentation about backups in Firebird, it has more details 
about corruptions and gbak/nbackup:
http://www.slideshare.net/ibsurgeon/everything-about-backups-firebird-by-dmitry-kuzmenko-ceo-ibsurgeon

Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon (www.ib-aid.com)


>
> Please feel free to correct my misconceptions.
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--
This is an automated response.  Your issue has been noted.  We'll be in touch 
soon.



Please reply to this email or visit the URL below with any additional details.

http://DANTOIN:9675/portal/view-help-request/11




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [firebird-support] Questions about nbackup

2011-11-01 Thread Alexey Kovyazin
Hello,
>
> I have been looking into switching from gbak to nbackup. From what I 
> have read about nbackup I am left with some, possibly incorrect, 
> impressions.
>
> 1) nbackup is a page level backup rather than a row-by-row backup like 
> gbak.
> 2) nbackup does no integrity checking of the database as it is backed 
> up. It simply copies the database page by page.
> 3) If 2) is true, then this would seem to imply that I could back up a 
> corrupted database using nbackup without ever knowing that the 
> database was corrupt.
> 4) If 2) & 3) are true this would seem to imply that I could restore a 
> corrupted database using nbackup and wind up with a corrupted 
> database, the same as the original.
>
In general, you are right.
Read this presentation about backups in Firebird, it has more details 
about corruptions and gbak/nbackup:
http://www.slideshare.net/ibsurgeon/everything-about-backups-firebird-by-dmitry-kuzmenko-ceo-ibsurgeon

Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon (www.ib-aid.com)


>
> Please feel free to correct my misconceptions.
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[firebird-support] Questions about nbackup

2011-11-01 Thread sboydlns
I have been looking into switching from gbak to nbackup.  From what I have read 
about nbackup I am left with some, possibly incorrect, impressions.

1) nbackup is a page level backup rather than a row-by-row backup like gbak.
2) nbackup does no integrity checking of the database as it is backed up.  It 
simply copies the database page by page.
3) If 2) is true, then this would seem to imply that I could back up a 
corrupted database using nbackup without ever knowing that the database was 
corrupt.
4) If 2) & 3) are true this would seem to imply that I could restore a 
corrupted database using nbackup and wind up with a corrupted database, the 
same as the original.

Please feel free to correct my misconceptions.