RE: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?

2006-06-26 Thread Giles Taylor
Doesn't work with Opera 9! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ryanm
Sent: 23 June 2006 09:35
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?

http://www.fjax.net/

ryanm
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?

2006-06-26 Thread Kevin Newman
It can do limited cross domain xml loading (obeying crossdomain.xml 
policy files of course), unlike the JavaScript XmlHttpRequest object. So 
if nothing else, it could work as a client side proxy, for those that 
can't run server side proxies, or just want less traffic to run through 
their server.


Kevin N.


ryanm wrote:

http://www.fjax.net/

ryanm



___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


[Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?

2006-06-23 Thread ryanm

http://www.fjax.net/

ryanm
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?

2006-06-23 Thread Mike Britton

Seems like a hack to me, from both the AJAX programming and Flash
programming perspective.

Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?

2006-06-23 Thread Rich Rodecker

ridiculous?  not really, i think its kind of slick, the idea to use
flash as your xml parser rather than the browser.

Overblown?  defintely.  i think i can actually hear those guys
stroking themselves from here.



On 6/23/06, hank williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Well... not really.

Of course I am not an ajax programmer, but if its as hard as they say, and
if it makes it easier for ajax programmers to code then why not?

Hank

On 6/23/06, ryanm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 http://www.fjax.net/

 ryanm
 ___
 Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 To change your subscription options or search the archive:
 http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

 Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
 Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
 http://www.figleaf.com
 http://training.figleaf.com

___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?

2006-06-23 Thread mark . s . luker
Error parsing XML data .. LOL!

The Digg Effect strikes again.  Anyway, I don't think it's hard to use
conditional branching in your Javascript to account for browser
differences, but I think FJAX is a neat idea anyway.



Mark Luker
Illustration Design  Interactive Media
GREF-Southern Facilities-Visual Communication Solutions
GSC-EMB-877B
713-656-4194


Taking on ExxonMobil's toughest web  multi-media design challenges
ยป http://emgs.na.xom.com/gref/bcsc/default.htm







___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?

2006-06-23 Thread ryanm

Of course I am not an ajax programmer, but if its as hard as they say, and
if it makes it easier for ajax programmers to code then why not?

   Because it makes your web site dependant on the Flash plugin when it 
doesn't need to be. You're trading the effort of browser compatibility for 
the effort of Flash versioning, which are about equal to begin with. But 
browser compatibility doesn't require VBScript. :-P


ryanm 


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


RE: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?

2006-06-23 Thread Ville Walveranta

Yes.. why not use remoting instead? Much cleaner from both the Flash and
server perspective. Of course, perhaps with aid of AJAX Flash front-end can
be fitted to more back-ends.

Ville

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Britton
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 12:47
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Fjax... does this seem ridiculous to anyone else?

Seems like a hack to me, from both the AJAX programming and Flash
programming perspective.

Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com