[flexcoders] Framework choice

2010-06-14 Thread Christophe
Hello, 

Which easy to learn framework to use to have a modular application ?

Thank you,
Christophe  




Re: [flexcoders] Framework choice

2010-06-14 Thread Jeffry Houser


 Well, I'd say learn the Flex Framework, the Flex Component LifeCycle, 
events, and parameter passing.  Adn you'll be easily able to make 
modular, encapsulated Flex Components that can be re-used amongst 
different Flex Applications.


 Beyond that there are plenty of frameworks out there (Cairngorm, 
PureMVC, RobotLegs, Swiz) that will give you an approach on building 
applications.  But, I find that the end goal of using such frameworks is 
long term application maintenance, not component modularity.


 Can you elaborate on what you mean by modular applications?

On 6/14/2010 7:23 AM, Christophe wrote:


Hello,

Which easy to learn framework to use to have a modular application ?

Thank you,
Christophe





--
Jeffry Houser, Technical Entrepreneur
Adobe Community Expert: http://tinyurl.com/684b5h
http://www.twitter.com/reboog711  | Phone: 203-379-0773
--
Easy to use Interface Components for Flex Developers
http://www.flextras.com?c=104
--
http://www.theflexshow.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
--
Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust



Re: [flexcoders] Framework Choice

2010-03-27 Thread Peeyush Tuli
One feature which i dont like about most of the flex frameworks is the use
of flex events for business logic communication E.g. one module trying to
notify others about a business logic based alert. The synchronous
notification pattern borrowed from Cocoa seems to be a better approach in
case of multi-modular scenarios.

Below is the link to the same -

http://blog.cjtech.co.uk/index.php/2009/03/02/a-better-way/


On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Jake Churchill reyna...@gmail.com wrote:



 I have been tasked with architecting a large application for a company a
 friend of mine works at.  I will also do some of the coding and act as a
 mentor, teaching people on staff the ins and outs of Flex.

 In the past, I've always used Cairngorm and Cairngorm w/ UM Extensions for
 a framework.  I wrote a very basic app w/ Mate once just to learn it and I
 didn't really like it.  So, my question to everyone here is what Framework
 would you chose?  Keep in mind, the people I'll be working with are
 relatively new to flex and the application is going to end up being quite
 large.  Down the road it will likely have an AIR counterpart.  We might use
 modules but for now I'm staying away from that because it adds another layer
 of complexity that in the initial stages is not needed.

 My thoughts on this are that Cairngorm would be easier to learn for them
 and they had talked about brining more people on in the future for this
 project.  If that's the case, it would likely be easier to find people
 familiar with Cairngorm than some of the alternatives.  But, I don't want to
 rule out any of the alternatives if they might actually be a better choice.


 Opinions please.

 Thanks!

 -Jake Churchill
  



[flexcoders] Framework Choice

2010-03-24 Thread Jake Churchill
I have been tasked with architecting a large application for a company a
friend of mine works at.  I will also do some of the coding and act as a
mentor, teaching people on staff the ins and outs of Flex.

In the past, I've always used Cairngorm and Cairngorm w/ UM Extensions for a
framework.  I wrote a very basic app w/ Mate once just to learn it and I
didn't really like it.  So, my question to everyone here is what Framework
would you chose?  Keep in mind, the people I'll be working with are
relatively new to flex and the application is going to end up being quite
large.  Down the road it will likely have an AIR counterpart.  We might use
modules but for now I'm staying away from that because it adds another layer
of complexity that in the initial stages is not needed.

My thoughts on this are that Cairngorm would be easier to learn for them and
they had talked about brining more people on in the future for this
project.  If that's the case, it would likely be easier to find people
familiar with Cairngorm than some of the alternatives.  But, I don't want to
rule out any of the alternatives if they might actually be a better choice.


Opinions please.

Thanks!

-Jake Churchill


Re: [flexcoders] Framework Choice

2010-03-24 Thread Steve Mathews
http://www.robotlegs.org/

http://www.robotlegs.org/Although your final choice may come down to
personal opinion, I find that Robotlegs is the best overall framework out
there. It is solid, supports modules and is easy to learn. It also has great
docs, a solid reference implementation and plenty of examples. Perhaps most
important though, it has one hell of a great community that will bend
over backwards to help you.

Steve


On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Jake Churchill reyna...@gmail.com wrote:



 I have been tasked with architecting a large application for a company a
 friend of mine works at.  I will also do some of the coding and act as a
 mentor, teaching people on staff the ins and outs of Flex.

 In the past, I've always used Cairngorm and Cairngorm w/ UM Extensions for
 a framework.  I wrote a very basic app w/ Mate once just to learn it and I
 didn't really like it.  So, my question to everyone here is what Framework
 would you chose?  Keep in mind, the people I'll be working with are
 relatively new to flex and the application is going to end up being quite
 large.  Down the road it will likely have an AIR counterpart.  We might use
 modules but for now I'm staying away from that because it adds another layer
 of complexity that in the initial stages is not needed.

 My thoughts on this are that Cairngorm would be easier to learn for them
 and they had talked about brining more people on in the future for this
 project.  If that's the case, it would likely be easier to find people
 familiar with Cairngorm than some of the alternatives.  But, I don't want to
 rule out any of the alternatives if they might actually be a better choice.


 Opinions please.

 Thanks!

 -Jake Churchill