Thank you Alex, worked just fine! :)

João Saleiro


--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try
> 
>  
> 
> public dynamic class TestExtended extends Test
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of João
> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 8:30 AM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Bug when extending in Flex a component created
in Flash CS3 ??
> 
>  
> 
> After some hours fighting, I've tried to create the simplest test case
> to solve one problem I was having with a component created in Flash
> CS3 and exported to Flex.
> 
> I have created in Flash CS3 a very simple component:
> 
> - One MovieClip "Test" (without code or graphics)
> - Inside that MovieClip, another one (without code or graphics) with
> an instance name set "myMC"
> 
> Then I used Flex Component Kit for Flash CS3 to export the SWC of the
> "Test" component. 
> 
> In Flex Builder, I've started creating an instance of the Flash CS3
> component on an empty MXML Application file. Compiled. Worked fine.
> 
> Then, I decided to create the extended version of my component. So:
> 
> package pt.webfuel.view.components
> {
> public class TestExtended extends Test
> {
> }
> }
> 
> Then I changed my MXML Application file so that is calls the extended
> version:
> 
> <componentes:TestExtended/>
> 
> Compiled without errors. But after opening on the browser, I get an
> exception: 
> 
> ReferenceError: Error #1056: Cannot create property myMC on
> pt.webfuel.view.componentes.TestExtended.
> at flash.display::Sprite/constructChildren()
> at flash.display::Sprite()
> at flash.display::MovieClip()
> at
>
mx.flash::UIMovieClip()[E:\dev\flex_3_beta3\sdk\frameworks\projects\flash-integration\src\mx\flash\UIMovieClip.as:475]
> 
> [etc. If you need the full message, please ask]
> 
> Am I missing something here, or is this a bug? 
> Should I file this on the Flex bugbase?
> 
> Also, is there a solution? This is creating us a lot of troubles :|
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> João Saleiro
>


Reply via email to