I believe so, first time I see it myself, never seen anything like this for Flex 2. Dimitrios Gianninas RIA Developer and Team Lead Optimal Payments Inc.
________________________________ From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of simonjpalmer Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 10:48 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: "transient" properties of an object using RemoteClass Wait... this is 3, I am on 2... I can't find a reference to this in Flex 2, is it a new feature of 3? --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "ben.clinkinbeard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex/3/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Book_Parts&file=metadata_066_15.html <http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex/3/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Book_Parts&file=metadata_066_15.html> > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , > "simonjpalmer" <simonjpalmer@> > wrote: > > > > I have a situation where I have a deliberate mismatch between my AS3 > > and Java objects. > > > > I have a Java object > > > > package com.java > > class X > > { > > private String name; > > public String getName(){return name;} > > public void setName(String name){this.name=name;} > > } > > > > and an ActionScript object > > > > package com.as3 > > { > > [Managed] > > [RemoteClass(alias="com.java.X")] > > public class X > > { > > private var name:String; > > private var age:Number; > > } > > } > > > > this all works great and my X.name gets transported back and forth > > reliably, however when data is transmitted from client to server I get > > a warning message from the framework on the server which says... > > > > "Ignoring set property age for type com.as3.X as a setter could not be > > found." > > > > This means that the age property was transmitted unnecessarily. Not a > > problem for a primitive like a Number, but a real problem if age > > contained an array of objects. > > > > What I think I need is something like the "transient" keyword in Java > > object persistence which causes a property not to be considered for > > persistence, or in this case transmission. > > > > Does any such thing exist, or is there another way of doing this? > > > > Thanks > > > -- WARNING ------- This electronic message and its attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information, which is solely for the use of the intended recipient. No privilege or other rights are waived by any unintended transmission or unauthorized retransmission of this message. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if you have received it in error, you should immediately stop reading this message and delete it and all attachments from your system. The reading, distribution, copying or other use of this message or its attachments by unintended recipients is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender. AVIS IMPORTANT -------------- Ce message électronique et ses pièces jointes peuvent contenir des renseignements confidentiels, exclusifs ou légalement privilégiés destinés au seul usage du destinataire visé. L'expéditeur original ne renonce à aucun privilège ou à aucun autre droit si le présent message a été transmis involontairement ou s'il est retransmis sans son autorisation. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire visé du présent message ou si vous l'avez reçu par erreur, veuillez cesser immédiatement de le lire et le supprimer, ainsi que toutes ses pièces jointes, de votre système. La lecture, la distribution, la copie ou tout autre usage du présent message ou de ses pièces jointes par des personnes autres que le destinataire visé ne sont pas autorisés et pourraient être illégaux. Si vous avez reçu ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur.
