Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching
You're right, we kinda are inconsistent here. The truth on the security fix is that you only need the updated historyFrame.html, so if the SWZ is important I'd recommend just applying that patch manually and you'll be good to go. Matt On 6/20/08 5:41 PM, João Fernandes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt, but since Adobe advises to upgrade to 3.0.2 due to a security bulletin, should Adobe provide all major functionalities? Right now we have to pick, the security fix or to be able to use the cache framework.
Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching
AFIK, swf are created by adobe, and by Adobe only... What you can do is create optimized SWF. Doesn't cache, but are smaller then standard swc files. VELO On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I've just downloaded the latest Flex 3 SDK here: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Download+Flex+3 Has anyone got any idea how to create the 'framework_3.0.2.2113.swz' or can I only cache major releases of the framework? i.e I've only ever got it to work with 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'. any help would be brill, thanks paddy ;)
RE: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching
Thanks Velo, Does anyone know how adobe implements releases for .swz files? i.e are they only available for major releases or is it just that adobe haven't got around to releasing a new one for 3.0.2.2113? Ta paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marvin Froeder Sent: 20 June 2008 14:40 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching AFIK, swf are created by adobe, and by Adobe only... What you can do is create optimized SWF. Doesn't cache, but are smaller then standard swc files. VELO On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I've just downloaded the latest Flex 3 SDK here: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Download+Flex+3 Has anyone got any idea how to create the 'framework_3.0.2.2113.swz' or can I only cache major releases of the framework? i.e I've only ever got it to work with 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'. any help would be brill, thanks paddy ;)
Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching
Hi, Our plan at the moment is to only create SWZ's for the milestone releases (3.x, but not 3.0.x). We have a milestone release for 3 on deck in late summer. Matt On 6/20/08 6:52 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Velo, Does anyone know how adobe implements releases for .swz files? i.e are they only available for major releases or is it just that adobe haven't got around to releasing a new one for 3.0.2.2113? Ta paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Marvin Froeder Sent: 20 June 2008 14:40 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching AFIK, swf are created by adobe, and by Adobe only... What you can do is create optimized SWF. Doesn't cache, but are smaller then standard swc files. VELO On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.uk wrote: Hi guys, I've just downloaded the latest Flex 3 SDK here: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Download+Flex+3 Has anyone got any idea how to create the 'framework_3.0.2.2113.swz' or can I only cache major releases of the framework? i.e I've only ever got it to work with 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'. any help would be brill, thanks paddy ;)
RE: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching
Thanks Matt, I'm a little confused as I've actually got a 'framework_3.0.189825.swz' knocking about somewhere but using it was causing problems (it was awhile ago we went through trying to implement it and can't remember specific issues but we had to revert back to 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'). We were prob doing something wrong but could you let me know if using 'framework_3.0.189825.swz' should be possible or if we should only be using 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'? in fact maybe you could let us know what the latest framework_3.0.x.swz 'rpc_3.0.0.x.swz' is, in case there are others? Thanks again, paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Chotin Sent: 20 June 2008 17:35 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching Hi, Our plan at the moment is to only create SWZ's for the milestone releases (3.x, but not 3.0.x). We have a milestone release for 3 on deck in late summer. Matt On 6/20/08 6:52 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Velo, Does anyone know how adobe implements releases for .swz files? i.e are they only available for major releases or is it just that adobe haven't got around to releasing a new one for 3.0.2.2113? Ta paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Marvin Froeder Sent: 20 June 2008 14:40 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching AFIK, swf are created by adobe, and by Adobe only... What you can do is create optimized SWF. Doesn't cache, but are smaller then standard swc files. VELO On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.uk wrote: Hi guys, I've just downloaded the latest Flex 3 SDK here: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Download+Flex+3 Has anyone got any idea how to create the 'framework_3.0.2.2113.swz' or can I only cache major releases of the framework? i.e I've only ever got it to work with 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'. any help would be brill, thanks paddy ;)
Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching
That looks like a beta build number. I don't think we've posted any SWZ's since 477, or if you did see a SWZ it might have been signed only with the test certificate. Matt On 6/20/08 10:52 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Matt, I'm a little confused as I've actually got a 'framework_3.0.189825.swz' knocking about somewhere but using it was causing problems (it was awhile ago we went through trying to implement it and can't remember specific issues but we had to revert back to 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'). We were prob doing something wrong but could you let me know if using 'framework_3.0.189825.swz' should be possible or if we should only be using 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'? in fact maybe you could let us know what the latest framework_3.0.x.swz 'rpc_3.0.0.x.swz' is, in case there are others? Thanks again, paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Matt Chotin Sent: 20 June 2008 17:35 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching Hi, Our plan at the moment is to only create SWZ's for the milestone releases (3.x, but not 3.0.x). We have a milestone release for 3 on deck in late summer. Matt On 6/20/08 6:52 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.uk wrote: Thanks Velo, Does anyone know how adobe implements releases for .swz files? i.e are they only available for major releases or is it just that adobe haven't got around to releasing a new one for 3.0.2.2113? Ta paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Marvin Froeder Sent: 20 June 2008 14:40 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching AFIK, swf are created by adobe, and by Adobe only... What you can do is create optimized SWF. Doesn't cache, but are smaller then standard swc files. VELO On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.uk mailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.uk wrote: Hi guys, I've just downloaded the latest Flex 3 SDK here: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Download+Flex+3 Has anyone got any idea how to create the 'framework_3.0.2.2113.swz' or can I only cache major releases of the framework? i.e I've only ever got it to work with 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'. any help would be brill, thanks paddy ;)
RE: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching
That's prob the issue. I've just done a test and get: error #2034: An invalid digest was supplied. Failed to load RSL framework_3.0.189825.swz Failing over to RSL framework_3.0.189825.swf Shame as it fixed some layout issues we were having and a few other things besides. Guess I'll have to have a long summer holiday ;) Is there any scope for releasing 'Stable' 3.0.x builds? It just means if you want to use the caching feature you need to be aware it might be hard taking advantage of updates and bug fixes. Caching is Uber important (it's one of the main reasons I got the green light to develop our latest Flex projects ;) ) If there's a way it can take advantage of patches/updates/bug fixes too that would be golden !... Anyway have a good weekend... paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Chotin Sent: 20 June 2008 19:05 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching That looks like a beta build number. I don't think we've posted any SWZ's since 477, or if you did see a SWZ it might have been signed only with the test certificate. Matt On 6/20/08 10:52 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Matt, I'm a little confused as I've actually got a 'framework_3.0.189825.swz' knocking about somewhere but using it was causing problems (it was awhile ago we went through trying to implement it and can't remember specific issues but we had to revert back to 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'). We were prob doing something wrong but could you let me know if using 'framework_3.0.189825.swz' should be possible or if we should only be using 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'? in fact maybe you could let us know what the latest framework_3.0.x.swz 'rpc_3.0.0.x.swz' is, in case there are others? Thanks again, paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Matt Chotin Sent: 20 June 2008 17:35 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching Hi, Our plan at the moment is to only create SWZ's for the milestone releases (3.x, but not 3.0.x). We have a milestone release for 3 on deck in late summer. Matt On 6/20/08 6:52 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.uk wrote: Thanks Velo, Does anyone know how adobe implements releases for .swz files? i.e are they only available for major releases or is it just that adobe haven't got around to releasing a new one for 3.0.2.2113? Ta paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Marvin Froeder Sent: 20 June 2008 14:40 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching AFIK, swf are created by adobe, and by Adobe only... What you can do is create optimized SWF. Doesn't cache, but are smaller then standard swc files. VELO On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.uk mailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.uk wrote: Hi guys, I've just downloaded the latest Flex 3 SDK here: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Download+Flex+3 Has anyone got any idea how to create the 'framework_3.0.2.2113.swz' or can I only cache major releases of the framework? i.e I've only ever got it to work with 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'. any help would be brill, thanks paddy ;)
Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching
Understand that caching is important. One reason that we don't necessarily push SWZs for stable builds though is that I don't have a great sense of how many folks are updating yet. We're going to watch the numbers. If everyone is really upgrading to the latest SDK stable build, then we can consider posting SWZs. But since a stable is supposed to come out every 60 days or sooner, that's a lot of cached RSLs that could end up out there. We do want to work on making it so that it's easier to apply a patch and still take advantage of the cache though. The problem is how the Flash Player loads stuff, if you apply a patch to a class that's a leaf, all of its dependencies must be loaded before it, and half the time that will negate the benefit of the cache. So we need to figure it out better. Some of the new framework architecture stuff we're looking at may help with this. Anyway, I'll keep an eye on things and we'll see what we can do. Matt On 6/20/08 11:32 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's prob the issue. I've just done a test and get: error #2034: An invalid digest was supplied. Failed to load RSL framework_3.0.189825.swz Failing over to RSL framework_3.0.189825.swf Shame as it fixed some layout issues we were having and a few other things besides. Guess I'll have to have a long summer holiday ;) Is there any scope for releasing 'Stable' 3.0.x builds? It just means if you want to use the caching feature you need to be aware it might be hard taking advantage of updates and bug fixes. Caching is Uber important (it's one of the main reasons I got the green light to develop our latest Flex projects ;) ) If there's a way it can take advantage of patches/updates/bug fixes too that would be golden !... Anyway have a good weekend... paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Matt Chotin Sent: 20 June 2008 19:05 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching That looks like a beta build number. I don't think we've posted any SWZ's since 477, or if you did see a SWZ it might have been signed only with the test certificate. Matt On 6/20/08 10:52 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.uk wrote: Thanks Matt, I'm a little confused as I've actually got a 'framework_3.0.189825.swz' knocking about somewhere but using it was causing problems (it was awhile ago we went through trying to implement it and can't remember specific issues but we had to revert back to 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'). We were prob doing something wrong but could you let me know if using 'framework_3.0.189825.swz' should be possible or if we should only be using 'framework_3.0.0.477.swz'? in fact maybe you could let us know what the latest framework_3.0.x.swz 'rpc_3.0.0.x.swz' is, in case there are others? Thanks again, paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Matt Chotin Sent: 20 June 2008 17:35 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching Hi, Our plan at the moment is to only create SWZ's for the milestone releases (3.x, but not 3.0.x). We have a milestone release for 3 on deck in late summer. Matt On 6/20/08 6:52 AM, Paddy Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.uk mailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.ukmailto:paddy.keane%40wai.co.uk wrote: Thanks Velo, Does anyone know how adobe implements releases for .swz files? i.e are they only available for major releases or is it just that adobe haven't got around to releasing a new one for 3.0.2.2113? Ta paddy ;) From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.commailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders
Re: [flexcoders] Verifyed RSL Digests for 3.0.2.2113 for framework caching
Matt, but since Adobe advises to upgrade to 3.0.2 due to a security bulletin, should Adobe provide all major functionalities? Right now we have to pick, the security fix or to be able to use the cache framework. -- João Fernandes http://www.onflexwithcf.org http://www.riapt.org Portugal Adobe User Group (http://aug.riapt.org)
