|
Hi
Thanks for
the reply , but the question was if there is a better way to do this than
separated apps, i have to use a tree cause its a design
requirement.
i though
that maybe there is a way to replace the content of the right frame with
different panel each time.
is it
possible to do it dynamically ? , for example the right is defined like
this, and upon a click in the tree the right panel should be
replaced.
<mx:VBox
id="mainPanel">
<pv:someModuleView>
<mx:Vbox>
function
switchView(view:String){
if (view=="someOtherModuleName"){
mainPanel.control??? = new someOtherModule();
}
}
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dimitrios Gianninas Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 03:11 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] what is the best practice for dynamic content change. Hi Shlomi,
Yes, for each app you want to load using the
Loader control, it must be in effect a standalone Flex app to begin with, so its
root tag must be the Application tag.
I don't know how big all these sub
applications are, but perhaps you can use a ViewStack instead and that should
server your purpose. If all you want to do is display one sub-app at a
time.
Hope that helps!
Dimitrios "Jimmy" Gianninas
RIA Developer
Optimal Payments Inc.
From: Shlomi Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:52 PM To: 'flexcoders@yahoogroups.com' Subject: [flexcoders] what is the best practice for dynamic content change. Hi
I have
windows explorer like application , the left panel contain
a
tree with a list of sub applications (modules)
and the right
panel is the main view .(which suppose to be used by each sub
application)
i want to be able
to load the right panel with the selected sub application .
I know that
Flex Explorer sample implemented something similar with the mx:Loader
tag. where every application is loaded by the URL sent to the loader
object.
the only design
fault i can see here is that every module have to be in its own mx:Application
tag otherwise the loader can't load it.
is there a better
way ? what is the best practice here
?
thanks
Shlomi
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Title: Mercury Email Signature
