[Flexradio] 683 comment

[root [knesbitt]]

Paul,
I can vouch for the ASUS P5W with the Intel 975X chipset. Not 
particularly cheap but far superior performance to my previous AMD 
athlon board.
I'm running the P5WD2 with a non-dual core cpu (P-4 HT LGA 775, 3.4 Ghz).
It simply purrs along with 683 feeding a Firebox over 1394. CPU load 
averages about 6-9% running PowerSDR in "letter box" mode (@96k). Don't 
skimp on the memory for this board. Look at the v/low latency dual 
channel (DDR2 800) stuff, as its my understanding that memory 
performance is more important than an over abundance in capacity (in 
this specific case).

Good luck!

Kirb - VE6IV


-- 


  [Flexradio] 683 comment

*Paul Shaffer* flex1 at cyberplasm.com 

/Wed Sep 20 23:31:37 CDT 2006/

* Previous message: [Flexradio] Front panel rf-af
  

* *Messages sorted by:* [ date ]
  

  [ thread ]
  

  [ subject ]
  

  [ author ]
  





My pc doesn't seem to keep up with the new UI features. CPU reading
varies a lot, from 50% to 70% generally. Tuning is not responsive as
before with mouse wheel, there's a lot more going on as the display
changes. Popping (or dropouts) in received audio is very noticable,
audio/dsp buffers at 1024/1024. I don't think there's anything wrong
with the software, and I like the new features, but I think it's time for
a new motherboard and cpu.

Here's what I'm looking at:

ASUS P5W DH DELUXE/WIFI-AP Socket T (LGA 775) Intel 975X ATX Intel Motherboard
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 Conroe 2.66GHz 4M sharing L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor

Then I need a new case, 500W power supply, new drives, the works. The old 
pc gets shoved down to the next desk and becomes the #2 machine.
A new pc like this will just barely keep me afloat for media center and hdtv
as well.








___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] 683 comment

[Paul Shaffer]

My pc doesn't seem to keep up with the new UI features. CPU reading
varies a lot, from 50% to 70% generally. Tuning is not responsive as
before with mouse wheel, there's a lot more going on as the display
changes. Popping (or dropouts) in received audio is very noticable,
audio/dsp buffers at 1024/1024. I don't think there's anything wrong
with the software, and I like the new features, but I think it's time for
a new motherboard and cpu.

Here's what I'm looking at:

ASUS P5W DH DELUXE/WIFI-AP Socket T (LGA 775) Intel 975X ATX Intel Motherboard
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 Conroe 2.66GHz 4M sharing L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor

Then I need a new case, 500W power supply, new drives, the works. The old 
pc gets shoved down to the next desk and becomes the #2 machine.
A new pc like this will just barely keep me afloat for media center and hdtv
as well.





___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] Front panel rf-af

[Paul Shaffer]

The "rf" control is new and not covered the manual.
What is the difference between rf and af in receive mode?




___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] missing DLL

[Tim Ellison]

Tom, 

You have one of three problems

1.) MDAC is corrupted 
2.) Your version of XP has been reinstalled back to its original release
3.) MSDART.dll is damaged.


Re-install MDAC to resolve this problem.

You can get MDAC 2.8 from here if you have a legal copy of Windows

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=6c050fe3-c795-4
b7d-b037-185d0506396c&displaylang=en


-Tim
---
Tim Ellison
Integrated Technical Services


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Shikoski
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 10:44 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] missing DLL

Well, as we are on the subject of missing stuff, I did an install of the
latest SVN to experiment with the dual receive and some of the other
neat
new stuff and I am now receiving a message indicating  "The procedure
entry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] could not be located in the dynamic link library
MSDART.DLL.

 

Thinking the DLL might be corrupted, I did an update on the DLL and
attempted to re register it with regsvr32. No luck. The error message
continues. Clicking "OK" repeats the error message four times after
which I
receive a "Fatal Error" message. This Fatal Error message appears as
follows:

 



 

All suggestions regarding how to get me back on the air are appreciated.

 

 


Tom Shikoski -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative & Technical Services, LLC
416 West Sleights Rd., Traverse City, Mich. 49686 231.941.5591


 

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060920/db71ffcf/attach
ment.html 
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 13107 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060920/db71ffcf/attach
ment.jpe 
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] missing DLL

[Tom Shikoski]

Well, as we are on the subject of missing stuff, I did an install of the
latest SVN to experiment with the dual receive and some of the other neat
new stuff and I am now receiving a message indicating  "The procedure entry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] could not be located in the dynamic link library MSDART.DLL.

 

Thinking the DLL might be corrupted, I did an update on the DLL and
attempted to re register it with regsvr32. No luck. The error message
continues. Clicking "OK" repeats the error message four times after which I
receive a "Fatal Error" message. This Fatal Error message appears as
follows:

 



 

All suggestions regarding how to get me back on the air are appreciated.

 

 


Tom Shikoski -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative & Technical Services, LLC
416 West Sleights Rd., Traverse City, Mich. 49686 231.941.5591


 

 

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060920/db71ffcf/attachment.html
 
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 13107 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060920/db71ffcf/attachment.jpe
 
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] SVN Upgrading - PLL options

[Kevin Hobbs]

Hi All;

I installed the Tortoise SVN ... everything worked fine ... the dual RX is
really neat.

When the new software version ran the first time I had to tell it all about
my SDR configuration again ... when it got to asking me about my PLL, it
only had options for 10 and 20 MHz ... not that it makes a big deal, but it
would be nice if it 100 MHz was also in the pull down selection.

73 de Kevin VE3KH


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] SVN 683 Installation Problems

[Tim Ellison]

Lack of sunspots :-)

It is hard to say.  Windows can be funny (strange) like that sometimes.

-Tim
---
Tim Ellison
Integrated Technical Services


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jim.k0mhc
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:32 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] SVN 683 Installation Problems

Fatal Error "Unable to find an entry point named SetRxListen in DLL 
DttSP.dll"

No, I didn't have the SDR operating when I updated via Tortoise and It's

always updated to the latest SVN before. What's different (in the SVN
update 
process) this time??

73, Jim
 


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX-split?

[Robert McGwier]

When I chose split,   and I pressed the MOX button,  the frequency 
across the grid did not change and the power spectrum for the 
transmitted voice had carrier at zero frequency.   Either we change the 
frequency readings across the top (which are incorrect when the MOX 
button is pushed and we are in split) or we have the "green box" on 
transmit.

Bob


John Sweeney wrote:
> What is not working properly just yet on the split? Seemed to work okay, 
> but  not so sure.  Im not at the SDR-1000 now to test.  
>
> John, N3WT
>
>
>  Robert McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
>   
>> Just be aware that this is a first accommodation of the second RX with 
>> some compromises.  Split is not working properly just yet.   From my 
>> read of the code,  this should be easy for Eric to get done.
>>
>> Bob
>> N4HY
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> N3WT wrote:
>> 
>>> The dual RX is great!  Thank you to the team and individuals working on all
>>> these enhancements.
>>>
>>>   
>
>
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
>
>   


-- 
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.
You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los
Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly
the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.
The only difference is that there is no cat." - Einstein


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] SVN 683 Installation Problems

[jim.k0mhc]

Fatal Error "Unable to find an entry point named SetRxListen in DLL 
DttSP.dll"

No, I didn't have the SDR operating when I updated via Tortoise and It's 
always updated to the latest SVN before. What's different (in the SVN update 
process) this time??

73, Jim
 


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] Sub RX

[w8ikn]

Volume of sub rx is very, very low. Is there a way to bring it up ?
   
  Thanks for all past help.
   
  73, Art


-
Get your email and more, right on the  new Yahoo.com 
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060920/13f49845/attachment.html
 
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Which way round?

[Eric Wachsmann]

Dave,

This reminded me of something.  You won't get good audio output if you have
something plugged into both the Line Out and the headphone output on the
MP3+.  This will load down the output and you'll get very little drive out
of the radio.  Perhaps this was the issue?


Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of Willi Reppel
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 4:35 PM
> To: David Ackrill; Philip M. Lanese
> Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Which way round?
> 
> Dave
> Make sure that the volume control on your MP3+ is turned to position "max"
> to get output from the transmitter.
> vy 73 de SM6OMH  Willi
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Ackrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Philip M. Lanese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Which way round?
> 
> 
> > That's a relief then.
> >
> > The only time it really mattered, for me, was Red on the Right at the
> > Rear.  Which indicated that the Red phase went to the right hand lug of
> > an 11kV triff box as you looked at it from the back of the switchgear...
> >
> > That was before the IEE and the EU standards people got involved
> though...
> >
> > Anyway, so the MP3+ connections wont be the problem.
> >
> > I'm still at a loss as to know why my SDK1K would not transmit though.
> >
> > Dave (G0DJA)
> >
> > Philip M. Lanese wrote:
> >> David
> >>
> >> Since there are only two wires, I only have to dedicate two of the fast
> >> deteriorating synapses to remember 'R'ed 'R'ing.
> >>
> >> Phil, K3IB
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "David Ackrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: 
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:27 PM
> >> Subject: [Flexradio] Which way round?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Whilst my SDR1000 is away being repaired, I have been looking at the
> >>> connections between the Soundblaster MP3+ and the radio.
> >>>
> >>> Line in when to line in and line out to line out, so that's OK, but
> >>> checking the red and white connectors shows that the red is connected
> to
> >>> the ring (middle connection) and White to the tip on each lead.
> >>>
> >>> Is that the right way round?  I'd have thought that the red went to
> the
> >>> tip, but I could be wrong.
> >>>
> >>> Anyone else using the MP3+ care to check for me please?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks - Dave (G0DJA)
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ___
> > FlexRadio mailing list
> > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Which way round?

[Willi Reppel]

Dave
Make sure that the volume control on your MP3+ is turned to position "max" 
to get output from the transmitter.
vy 73 de SM6OMH  Willi

- Original Message - 
From: "David Ackrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Philip M. Lanese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Which way round?


> That's a relief then.
>
> The only time it really mattered, for me, was Red on the Right at the
> Rear.  Which indicated that the Red phase went to the right hand lug of
> an 11kV triff box as you looked at it from the back of the switchgear...
>
> That was before the IEE and the EU standards people got involved though...
>
> Anyway, so the MP3+ connections wont be the problem.
>
> I'm still at a loss as to know why my SDK1K would not transmit though.
>
> Dave (G0DJA)
>
> Philip M. Lanese wrote:
>> David
>>
>> Since there are only two wires, I only have to dedicate two of the fast
>> deteriorating synapses to remember 'R'ed 'R'ing.
>>
>> Phil, K3IB
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "David Ackrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: 
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:27 PM
>> Subject: [Flexradio] Which way round?
>>
>>
>>
>>> Whilst my SDR1000 is away being repaired, I have been looking at the
>>> connections between the Soundblaster MP3+ and the radio.
>>>
>>> Line in when to line in and line out to line out, so that's OK, but
>>> checking the red and white connectors shows that the red is connected to
>>> the ring (middle connection) and White to the tip on each lead.
>>>
>>> Is that the right way round?  I'd have thought that the red went to the
>>> tip, but I could be wrong.
>>>
>>> Anyone else using the MP3+ care to check for me please?
>>>
>>> Thanks - Dave (G0DJA)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
> 



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX-split?

[Eric Wachsmann]

Split mode is working as best as I can tell.  There was a problem with Split
+ XIT that will be fixed in SVN 684, but other than this, I could not find a
problem.  It will still show up near the 0 Hz line.  Perhaps that is
throwing some people off.


Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of John Sweeney
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:35 PM
> Cc: FlexRadio
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX-split?
> 
> What is not working properly just yet on the split? Seemed to work
> okay, but  not so sure.  Im not at the SDR-1000 now to test.
> 
> John, N3WT
> 
> 
>  Robert McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just be aware that this is a first accommodation of the second RX with
> > some compromises.  Split is not working properly just yet.   From my
> > read of the code,  this should be easy for Eric to get done.
> >
> > Bob
> > N4HY
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > N3WT wrote:
> > > The dual RX is great!  Thank you to the team and individuals working
> on all
> > > these enhancements.
> > >
> 
> 
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX

[Jerald Jones]

Thanks, Bob Ken and John,

 I am not used to useing the B vfo and had it sitting off on another 
band.  It worked just fine once I received your infromation.  I will now 
give it a test and see how it opens up the world.

Thanks,

Jerry  WK0J

- Original Message - 
From: "Bob McGwier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jerald Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Robert McGwier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "N3WT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
"FlexRadio" 
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX


> Jerald:
>
> Hover over the VFOb  numbers (on the right at the top of the display) and 
> use the mouse wheel to tune both VFO's to exactly the same frequency. 
> Then hover over the 100 Hz position and mouse wheel up and down.  You 
> should see the "green box" for the subRX move around with respect to the 
> main VFOa frequency.
>
> Bob
> N4HY
>
> Jerald Jones wrote:
>
>>Regarding the 683 Sub RX , I seem to have no way to tune the sub receiver. 
>>The pan controls work fine but I do not have the slightest idea how to 
>>view the freq of more than one receiver or to tune more than one receiver. 
>>Also the Vox has not worked in any of the versions.  Perhaps the reason is 
>>that I use the Santa Cruz audio card.
>>
>>Jerry  WK0J
>>
>>- Original Message - 
>>From: "Robert McGwier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "N3WT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Cc: "FlexRadio" 
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:21 AM
>>Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX
>>
>>
>>
>>>Just be aware that this is a first accommodation of the second RX with
>>>some compromises.  Split is not working properly just yet.   From my
>>>read of the code,  this should be easy for Eric to get done.
>>>
>>>Bob
>>>N4HY
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>N3WT wrote:
>>>
The dual RX is great!  Thank you to the team and individuals working on 
all
these enhancements.

Will be very useful indeed for breaking a CW DX pile-up working split!
Sure sounds nice.   The effect is best with headphones, I think. My
SDR-1000 is a whole week and 124 cw qso's old.  Already have seen great
enhancements.
Can't do that with other rigs out there.

It just keeps getting better and better!.  (it's true, like the ad copy
says)

73  N3WT,  John



>>>-- 
>>>AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
>>>NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
>>>"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.
>>>You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los
>>>Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly
>>>the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.
>>>The only difference is that there is no cat." - Einstein
>>>
>>>
>>>___
>>>FlexRadio mailing list
>>>FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
>>>http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
>>>Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
>>>FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>___
>>FlexRadio mailing list
>>FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
>>http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
>>Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
>>FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Robert W. McGwier, Ph.D.
> Center for Communications Research
> 805 Bunn Drive
> Princeton, NJ 08540
> (609)-924-4600
> (sig required by employer)
>
>
>
> 



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX

[Bob McGwier]

Jerald:

Hover over the VFOb  numbers (on the right at the top of the display) 
and use the mouse wheel to tune both VFO's to exactly the same 
frequency.  Then hover over the 100 Hz position and mouse wheel up and 
down.  You should see the "green box" for the subRX move around with 
respect to the main VFOa frequency.

Bob
N4HY

Jerald Jones wrote:

>Regarding the 683 Sub RX , I seem to have no way to tune the sub receiver. 
>The pan controls work fine but I do not have the slightest idea how to view 
>the freq of more than one receiver or to tune more than one receiver.  Also 
>the Vox has not worked in any of the versions.  Perhaps the reason is that I 
>use the Santa Cruz audio card.
>
>Jerry  WK0J
>
>- Original Message - 
>From: "Robert McGwier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "N3WT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: "FlexRadio" 
>Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:21 AM
>Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX
>
>
>  
>
>>Just be aware that this is a first accommodation of the second RX with
>>some compromises.  Split is not working properly just yet.   From my
>>read of the code,  this should be easy for Eric to get done.
>>
>>Bob
>>N4HY
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>N3WT wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The dual RX is great!  Thank you to the team and individuals working on 
>>>all
>>>these enhancements.
>>>
>>>Will be very useful indeed for breaking a CW DX pile-up working split!
>>>Sure sounds nice.   The effect is best with headphones, I think. My
>>>SDR-1000 is a whole week and 124 cw qso's old.  Already have seen great
>>>enhancements.
>>>Can't do that with other rigs out there.
>>>
>>>It just keeps getting better and better!.  (it's true, like the ad copy
>>>says)
>>>
>>>73  N3WT,  John
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>-- 
>>AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
>>NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
>>"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.
>>You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los
>>Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly
>>the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.
>>The only difference is that there is no cat." - Einstein
>>
>>
>>___
>>FlexRadio mailing list
>>FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
>>http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
>>Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
>>FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>___
>FlexRadio mailing list
>FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
>http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
>Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
>FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
>
>  
>


-- 
Robert W. McGwier, Ph.D.
Center for Communications Research
805 Bunn Drive
Princeton, NJ 08540
(609)-924-4600
(sig required by employer)



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX

[Jerald Jones]

Regarding the 683 Sub RX , I seem to have no way to tune the sub receiver. 
The pan controls work fine but I do not have the slightest idea how to view 
the freq of more than one receiver or to tune more than one receiver.  Also 
the Vox has not worked in any of the versions.  Perhaps the reason is that I 
use the Santa Cruz audio card.

Jerry  WK0J

- Original Message - 
From: "Robert McGwier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "N3WT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "FlexRadio" 
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX


> Just be aware that this is a first accommodation of the second RX with
> some compromises.  Split is not working properly just yet.   From my
> read of the code,  this should be easy for Eric to get done.
>
> Bob
> N4HY
>
>
>
>
>
> N3WT wrote:
>> The dual RX is great!  Thank you to the team and individuals working on 
>> all
>> these enhancements.
>>
>> Will be very useful indeed for breaking a CW DX pile-up working split!
>> Sure sounds nice.   The effect is best with headphones, I think. My
>> SDR-1000 is a whole week and 124 cw qso's old.  Already have seen great
>> enhancements.
>> Can't do that with other rigs out there.
>>
>> It just keeps getting better and better!.  (it's true, like the ad copy
>> says)
>>
>> 73  N3WT,  John
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
> NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
> "You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.
> You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los
> Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly
> the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.
> The only difference is that there is no cat." - Einstein
>
>
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
>
> 



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Which way round?

[David Ackrill]

That's a relief then.

The only time it really mattered, for me, was Red on the Right at the 
Rear.  Which indicated that the Red phase went to the right hand lug of 
an 11kV triff box as you looked at it from the back of the switchgear...

That was before the IEE and the EU standards people got involved though...

Anyway, so the MP3+ connections wont be the problem.

I'm still at a loss as to know why my SDK1K would not transmit though.

Dave (G0DJA)

Philip M. Lanese wrote:
> David
>
> Since there are only two wires, I only have to dedicate two of the fast
> deteriorating synapses to remember 'R'ed 'R'ing.
>
> Phil, K3IB
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Ackrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:27 PM
> Subject: [Flexradio] Which way round?
>
>
>   
>> Whilst my SDR1000 is away being repaired, I have been looking at the
>> connections between the Soundblaster MP3+ and the radio.
>>
>> Line in when to line in and line out to line out, so that's OK, but
>> checking the red and white connectors shows that the red is connected to
>> the ring (middle connection) and White to the tip on each lead.
>>
>> Is that the right way round?  I'd have thought that the red went to the
>> tip, but I could be wrong.
>>
>> Anyone else using the MP3+ care to check for me please?
>>
>> Thanks - Dave (G0DJA)
>> 
>
>
>
>   

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX-split?

[John Sweeney]

What is not working properly just yet on the split? Seemed to work okay, 
but  not so sure.  Im not at the SDR-1000 now to test.  

John, N3WT


 Robert McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> Just be aware that this is a first accommodation of the second RX with 
> some compromises.  Split is not working properly just yet.   From my 
> read of the code,  this should be easy for Eric to get done.
> 
> Bob
> N4HY
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> N3WT wrote:
> > The dual RX is great!  Thank you to the team and individuals working on all
> > these enhancements.
> >


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List

[Allen Boehm]

I second the motion!

On 9/20/06 12:40 PM, "Tim Ellison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My vote is to expend the programming effort on the new console and only
> consider the Multi-RX enhancements that are "low hanging fruit" for
> inclusion in the 1.x console.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Tim
> ---
> Integrated Technical Services
> 
> "Too much of everything is just enough."
> -Rob Barlow
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wachsmann
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 12:37 PM
> To: 'A.R.S. - W5AMI'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List
> 
> The simple SubRX with same mode and filter was not too difficult to
> implement thanks to the facilities that Bob and Frank provided (a LONG
> time ago!).  However, the code is nowhere near ready for individual
> modes/filters/other settings.  And to add them would be a fair amount of
> work.  I'll be honestwe may never have those options in this
> console.
> 
> One of the major reasons for adopting the new architecture is to address
> this particular problem (data model -- removed from GUI).  It is being
> built in such a way that this is no-brainer.  To build it into the
> current console would be at least 2x work at best undoing our current
> source code data model.  All of this is to say that you may have to wait
> until the new console for more Multi-RX functionality.
> 
> 
> Eric Wachsmann
> FlexRadio Systems
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>> radio.biz] On Behalf Of A.R.S. - W5AMI
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:24 AM
>> To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
>> Subject: [Flexradio] Feature Request List
>> 
>> I noticed today that I can delete my requests in the "Feature Request"
>> system.  Two requests I made a while back have been implemented on the
> 
>> new SVN so I decided to delete them so not to clutter the request
>> list.  I don't know if this is exactly the proper procedure.  Being a
>> programmer myself, I know how version control, clutter and other
>> things can add to my confusion and daily hair pulling.
>> 
>> Eric, would it help for us users to go back and delete these requests
>> we made if said request has been implemented?
>> 
>> By the way, I am very pleased with the new sub rx and other things in
>> 683!  Wonder if there is any way to allow cross mode listening.  Say
>> AM on the main and LSB on the sub?  I know, one thing at a time;)
>> 
>> 
>> Brian w5ami
>> 
>> ___
>> FlexRadio mailing list
>> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
>> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
>> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
>> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
> 
> 
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
> 
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
> 



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Which way round?

[Philip M. Lanese]

David

Since there are only two wires, I only have to dedicate two of the fast
deteriorating synapses to remember 'R'ed 'R'ing.

Phil, K3IB

- Original Message -
From: "David Ackrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:27 PM
Subject: [Flexradio] Which way round?


> Whilst my SDR1000 is away being repaired, I have been looking at the
> connections between the Soundblaster MP3+ and the radio.
>
> Line in when to line in and line out to line out, so that's OK, but
> checking the red and white connectors shows that the red is connected to
> the ring (middle connection) and White to the tip on each lead.
>
> Is that the right way round?  I'd have thought that the red went to the
> tip, but I could be wrong.
>
> Anyone else using the MP3+ care to check for me please?
>
> Thanks - Dave (G0DJA)



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List

[Tim Ellison]

My vote is to expend the programming effort on the new console and only
consider the Multi-RX enhancements that are "low hanging fruit" for
inclusion in the 1.x console.




-Tim
---
Integrated Technical Services 

"Too much of everything is just enough."
-Rob Barlow

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wachsmann
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 12:37 PM
To: 'A.R.S. - W5AMI'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List

The simple SubRX with same mode and filter was not too difficult to
implement thanks to the facilities that Bob and Frank provided (a LONG
time ago!).  However, the code is nowhere near ready for individual
modes/filters/other settings.  And to add them would be a fair amount of
work.  I'll be honestwe may never have those options in this
console.

One of the major reasons for adopting the new architecture is to address
this particular problem (data model -- removed from GUI).  It is being
built in such a way that this is no-brainer.  To build it into the
current console would be at least 2x work at best undoing our current
source code data model.  All of this is to say that you may have to wait
until the new console for more Multi-RX functionality.


Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> radio.biz] On Behalf Of A.R.S. - W5AMI
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:24 AM
> To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: [Flexradio] Feature Request List
> 
> I noticed today that I can delete my requests in the "Feature Request"
> system.  Two requests I made a while back have been implemented on the

> new SVN so I decided to delete them so not to clutter the request 
> list.  I don't know if this is exactly the proper procedure.  Being a 
> programmer myself, I know how version control, clutter and other 
> things can add to my confusion and daily hair pulling.
> 
> Eric, would it help for us users to go back and delete these requests 
> we made if said request has been implemented?
> 
> By the way, I am very pleased with the new sub rx and other things in 
> 683!  Wonder if there is any way to allow cross mode listening.  Say 
> AM on the main and LSB on the sub?  I know, one thing at a time;)
> 
> 
> Brian w5ami
> 
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] Which way round?

[David Ackrill]

Whilst my SDR1000 is away being repaired, I have been looking at the 
connections between the Soundblaster MP3+ and the radio.

Line in when to line in and line out to line out, so that's OK, but 
checking the red and white connectors shows that the red is connected to 
the ring (middle connection) and White to the tip on each lead.

Is that the right way round?  I'd have thought that the red went to the 
tip, but I could be wrong.

Anyone else using the MP3+ care to check for me please?

Thanks - Dave (G0DJA)

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List

[A.R.S. - W5AMI]

Understandable Eric.  I'm really happy to have what's there now!

I doubt I would use cross mode dual rx that often anyway.

Thanks Again

Brian w5ami


On 9/20/06, Eric Wachsmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The simple SubRX with same mode and filter was not too difficult to
> implement thanks to the facilities that Bob and Frank provided (a LONG time
> ago!).  However, the code is nowhere near ready for individual
> modes/filters/other settings.  And to add them would be a fair amount of
> work.  I'll be honestwe may never have those options in this console.
>
> One of the major reasons for adopting the new architecture is to address
> this particular problem (data model -- removed from GUI).  It is being built
> in such a way that this is no-brainer.  To build it into the current console
> would be at least 2x work at best undoing our current source code data
> model.  All of this is to say that you may have to wait until the new
> console for more Multi-RX functionality.
>
>
> Eric Wachsmann
> FlexRadio Systems
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > radio.biz] On Behalf Of A.R.S. - W5AMI
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:24 AM
> > To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> > Subject: [Flexradio] Feature Request List
> >
> > I noticed today that I can delete my requests in the "Feature Request"
> > system.  Two requests I made a while back have been implemented on the
> > new SVN so I decided to delete them so not to clutter the request
> > list.  I don't know if this is exactly the proper procedure.  Being a
> > programmer myself, I know how version control, clutter and other
> > things can add to my confusion and daily hair pulling.
> >
> > Eric, would it help for us users to go back and delete these requests
> > we made if said request has been implemented?
> >
> > By the way, I am very pleased with the new sub rx and other things in
> > 683!  Wonder if there is any way to allow cross mode listening.  Say
> > AM on the main and LSB on the sub?  I know, one thing at a time;)
> >
> >
> > Brian w5ami
> >
> > ___
> > FlexRadio mailing list
> > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
>
>


-- 
"There is nothing more uncommon than common sense." -- Frank Lloyd Wright

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List

[Eric Wachsmann]

The simple SubRX with same mode and filter was not too difficult to
implement thanks to the facilities that Bob and Frank provided (a LONG time
ago!).  However, the code is nowhere near ready for individual
modes/filters/other settings.  And to add them would be a fair amount of
work.  I'll be honestwe may never have those options in this console.

One of the major reasons for adopting the new architecture is to address
this particular problem (data model -- removed from GUI).  It is being built
in such a way that this is no-brainer.  To build it into the current console
would be at least 2x work at best undoing our current source code data
model.  All of this is to say that you may have to wait until the new
console for more Multi-RX functionality.


Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of A.R.S. - W5AMI
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:24 AM
> To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: [Flexradio] Feature Request List
> 
> I noticed today that I can delete my requests in the "Feature Request"
> system.  Two requests I made a while back have been implemented on the
> new SVN so I decided to delete them so not to clutter the request
> list.  I don't know if this is exactly the proper procedure.  Being a
> programmer myself, I know how version control, clutter and other
> things can add to my confusion and daily hair pulling.
> 
> Eric, would it help for us users to go back and delete these requests
> we made if said request has been implemented?
> 
> By the way, I am very pleased with the new sub rx and other things in
> 683!  Wonder if there is any way to allow cross mode listening.  Say
> AM on the main and LSB on the sub?  I know, one thing at a time;)
> 
> 
> Brian w5ami
> 
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] Feature Request List

[A.R.S. - W5AMI]

I noticed today that I can delete my requests in the "Feature Request"
system.  Two requests I made a while back have been implemented on the
new SVN so I decided to delete them so not to clutter the request
list.  I don't know if this is exactly the proper procedure.  Being a
programmer myself, I know how version control, clutter and other
things can add to my confusion and daily hair pulling.

Eric, would it help for us users to go back and delete these requests
we made if said request has been implemented?

By the way, I am very pleased with the new sub rx and other things in
683!  Wonder if there is any way to allow cross mode listening.  Say
AM on the main and LSB on the sub?  I know, one thing at a time;)


Brian w5ami

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

[Bob McGwier]

What he said!

Jim Lux wrote:

>At 06:36 AM 9/20/2006, Robert McGwier wrote:
>  
>
>>I believe that Peter has probably hit on the correct interpretation.  If
>>so (and I will test this today) and TortoiseSVN is NOT giving a "cannot
>>write" error message,  this is a bug since this cannot be allowed to happen.
>>
>>Windows locks dll's that are in use and refuses to allow them to be
>>overwritten.
>>
>>
>
>More properly, Windows locks dlls that it *thinks are in use*, which 
>may or may not be the actual case.  It's not unheard of for a program 
>to terminate (typically abnormally) and for Windows to not realize 
>that the dll is now free. More likely in complex programs with lots 
>of interacting dlls.  Especially if one dll calls things in another 
>dll.  There is a tool around that lets you look at what Windows is 
>thinking, but I can't recall the name.  I just reboot before doing 
>things like installations.
>
>
>Jim, W6RMK 
>
>
>  
>


-- 
Robert W. McGwier, Ph.D.
Center for Communications Research
805 Bunn Drive
Princeton, NJ 08540
(609)-924-4600
(sig required by employer)



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] 683 Zip Download question

[Eric Wachsmann]

It believe it is just a zip of the binary files as opposed to a complete
installer (similar to SVN) if that is what you were asking.


Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of Jerry Flanders
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 9:03 AM
> To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] 683 Zip Download question
> 
> Is this a complete distribution package for this experimental
> version? If not, how do I use it to enhance an existing install? I
> apologize if I missed any earlier discussion on this topic.
> 
> Jerry W4UK
> 
> At 08:20 9/20/2006, A.R.S. -  W5AMI wrote:
> >To all non-Tortoise users ;)
> >
> >I have zipped SVN 683 and it is ready for download at:
> >
> >http://w5ami.net/683.zip
> >
> >This is the SVN that contain the new sub RX feature.  Really cool stuff!
> >
> >Brian w5ami
> 
> 
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] 683 Zip Download question

[A.R.S. - W5AMI]

Jerry,

If you need to pick and choose which dll, etc. to update, you need to
use Tortoise instead.  The zip contain the entire system, less the
database.  You can unzip the entire thing into an empty directory and
then import or copy your db there.

Brian w5ami

On 9/20/06, Jerry Flanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this a complete distribution package for this experimental
> version? If not, how do I use it to enhance an existing install? I
> apologize if I missed any earlier discussion on this topic.
>
> Jerry W4UK
>
> At 08:20 9/20/2006, A.R.S. -  W5AMI wrote:
> >To all non-Tortoise users ;)
> >
> >I have zipped SVN 683 and it is ready for download at:
> >
> >http://w5ami.net/683.zip
> >
> >This is the SVN that contain the new sub RX feature.  Really cool stuff!
> >
> >Brian w5ami
>
>
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
>


-- 
"There is nothing more uncommon than common sense." -- Frank Lloyd Wright

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

[Jim Lux]

At 06:36 AM 9/20/2006, Robert McGwier wrote:
>I believe that Peter has probably hit on the correct interpretation.  If
>so (and I will test this today) and TortoiseSVN is NOT giving a "cannot
>write" error message,  this is a bug since this cannot be allowed to happen.
>
>Windows locks dll's that are in use and refuses to allow them to be
>overwritten.

More properly, Windows locks dlls that it *thinks are in use*, which 
may or may not be the actual case.  It's not unheard of for a program 
to terminate (typically abnormally) and for Windows to not realize 
that the dll is now free. More likely in complex programs with lots 
of interacting dlls.  Especially if one dll calls things in another 
dll.  There is a tool around that lets you look at what Windows is 
thinking, but I can't recall the name.  I just reboot before doing 
things like installations.


Jim, W6RMK 



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] "How do I get SVN: 683".....

[Ken - N9VV]

Use TortoiseSVN and get the latest FULL BINARY DISTRIBUTION at anytime 
you like:
http://www.flex-radio.com/download_files/PowerSDR/Docs/TortoiseSVN.pdf

Toward the bottom of the document, you will see the link for the BINARY 
distribution. Use an empty subdirectory. Copy and paste that into 
TortoiseSVN (repo-browser or update window) and you will receive the 
binaries automatically.

de ken n9vv

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] SVN: 683

[Dave Muskopf]

I can't get 683 to load. It says "SetRXListen in DLL Dttsp.dll" can't be 
found or something like that. What do I do? And where are these DLL 
files? W8XO

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] 683 Zip Download question

[Jerry Flanders]

Is this a complete distribution package for this experimental 
version? If not, how do I use it to enhance an existing install? I 
apologize if I missed any earlier discussion on this topic.

Jerry W4UK

At 08:20 9/20/2006, A.R.S. -  W5AMI wrote:
>To all non-Tortoise users ;)
>
>I have zipped SVN 683 and it is ready for download at:
>
>http://w5ami.net/683.zip
>
>This is the SVN that contain the new sub RX feature.  Really cool stuff!
>
>Brian w5ami


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] spam: Sub RX

[Frank Brickle]

On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 09:48 -0400, Philip Covington wrote:
> I didn't know there was a Linux version of PowerSDR Console! :-)

There isn't. There are several varieties of Linux consoles. Quad RX has
been around in G3UKB's Python version for well over a year, though, I
think.

73
Frank
AB2KT



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] spam: Sub RX

[Philip Covington]

I didn't know there was a Linux version of PowerSDR Console! :-)

73 de Phil N8VB


On 9/19/06, Frank Brickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah. It's been in the Linux version forever ;-)
>
> 73
> Frank
> AB2KT
>
> On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 22:12 -0400, Philip Covington wrote:
> > Yeah, kinda like déjà vu!
> >
> > 73 de Phil N8VB
> >
> > On 9/19/06, Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Very Cool!  Congrats guys.
> > >
> > > Bob K5KDN
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert McGwier
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 8:42 PM
> > > To: FlexRadio
> > > Subject: spam: [Flexradio] Sub RX
> > >
> > >
> > > The Sub RX is implemented.   My part in this was huge.  Eric asked me a
> > > single question and then did all of the work.:-)
> > >
> > > It is spectacular.  Frank's work on the panning from left ear to right
> > > ear, etc. is working perfectly.  SVN 683
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bob
> > > N4HY
> > >
> > > --
> > > AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
> > > NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
> > > "You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.
> > > You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los
> > > Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly
> > > the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.
> > > The only difference is that there is no cat." - Einstein
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > FlexRadio mailing list
> > > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> > > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> > > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> > > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > FlexRadio mailing list
> > > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> > > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> > > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> > > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
> > >
> >
> > ___
> > FlexRadio mailing list
> > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
> >
>
>

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] SVN683

[Robert McGwier]

The brute force method I use is to simply delete the files and do an 
update.   The fact that these files are SUPPOSED to be there is stored 
in a "hidden" directory .svn in each subdirectory of our SVN tree.  They 
will be replaced.

Bob
N4HY


Jim, W4ATK wrote:
> Wow! It took a moment for this senior citizen to work it all out, but what
> an enhancement.
>
> FWIW, I create new directories for each SVN and then simply import the DB.
> It works great here. Everything updates cleanly.
>
> Very Cool! Take that KenSu!
>
> Jim, W4ATK
>
>
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
>
>   


-- 
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.
You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los
Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly
the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.
The only difference is that there is no cat." - Einstein


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

[Robert McGwier]

I believe that Peter has probably hit on the correct interpretation.  If 
so (and I will test this today) and TortoiseSVN is NOT giving a "cannot 
write" error message,  this is a bug since this cannot be allowed to happen.

Windows locks dll's that are in use and refuses to allow them to be 
overwritten.

Bob





[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If the files in question are dlls, I would guess that they were in use
> (loaded) at the time you attempted to do the svn update; svn would be
> unable to delete the old version as part of the replacement operation.
> Was PowerSDR running at that time?
>
> Pete, N3EVL 
>
>   
>> -


-- 
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.
You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los
Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly
the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.
The only difference is that there is no cat." - Einstein


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] spam: Sub RX

[Robert McGwier]

Phil's  SDRconsole was the first to support split receivers for 
Windows.   The differences in this implementation is it makes use of the 
DttSP facility which has been in the dsp code since the official 1.0 
release including panning control.The second receiver is under VFO-B 
control that is identical to VFO-A, and the second receiver passband is 
displayed on the GUI in a very usable fashion.  If you switch VFO-A 
frequency,  VFO-B and the sub RX continue to stay on the correct 
frequency (up to size of your IF, determined by the sample rate).

Frank and I are ecstatic that the facility which has been in the dsp 
code for a loonnnggg time, including the support for panning,  is 
supported in a usable fashion on PowerSDR 1.X.

Thank you Eric.

Bob
N4HY

Philip Covington wrote:
> Yeah, kinda like déjà vu!
>
> 73 de Phil N8VB
>
> On 9/19/06, Bob Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> Very Cool!  Congrats guys.
>>
>> Bob K5KDN
>>
>> 


-- 
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.
You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los
Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly
the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.
The only difference is that there is no cat." - Einstein


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Sub RX

[Robert McGwier]

Just be aware that this is a first accommodation of the second RX with 
some compromises.  Split is not working properly just yet.   From my 
read of the code,  this should be easy for Eric to get done.

Bob
N4HY





N3WT wrote:
> The dual RX is great!  Thank you to the team and individuals working on all
> these enhancements.
>
> Will be very useful indeed for breaking a CW DX pile-up working split!
> Sure sounds nice.   The effect is best with headphones, I think. My
> SDR-1000 is a whole week and 124 cw qso's old.  Already have seen great
> enhancements.
> Can't do that with other rigs out there.
>
> It just keeps getting better and better!.  (it's true, like the ad copy
> says)
>
> 73  N3WT,  John
>
>   


-- 
AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman
"You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.
You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los
Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly
the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there.
The only difference is that there is no cat." - Einstein


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

[Tim Ellison]

Chas,

>From the date stamps, you can tell what files were downloaded/updated
and which ones were not.  Delete the files with the older date stamp and
re-download SVN.  SVN will realize you have removed files and replace
them.


-Tim
---
Integrated Technical Services 

"Too much of everything is just enough."
-Rob Barlow

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Greene
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:59 AM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

Hello,

I atempted to download SVN683 this morning and got error messages on two
.dlls.  Evidently it didn't download them as they were in use.  I was
running SVN 682 at the time.  The program says it is SVN 683, but it
isn't, and when I try to update SVN, it won't; says it is SVN 683, as
the text file has been updated to SVN 683.

How do I recover from this goof? 



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] SVN: 683

[Charles Greene]

Hello,

I atempted to download SVN683 this morning and got error messages on 
two .dlls.  Evidently it didn't download them as they were in use.  I 
was running SVN 682 at the time.  The program says it is SVN 683, but 
it isn't, and when I try to update SVN, it won't; says it is SVN 683, 
as the text file has been updated to SVN 683.

How do I recover from this goof? 



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

[Dave Kiefer]

Pete,

No, PowerSDR was not running. I always do the update before I
start it for the day.
I agree, if they are in use they won't be overwritten, so I don't have
it running, and I usually am starting it from a clean boot.

Dave - N4DWK


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If the files in question are dlls, I would guess that they were in use
> (loaded) at the time you attempted to do the svn update; svn would be
> unable to delete the old version as part of the replacement operation.
> Was PowerSDR running at that time?
> 
> Pete, N3EVL 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Kiefer
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:05 AM
>> To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
>> Subject: [Flexradio] SVN: 683
>>
>> I have a question for the brain trust.
>>
>> I updated to SVN:683 and Power SDR would not start up after 
>> that, telling me something about not being able to insert 
>> receive frequency or something into DttSP.dll. Upon further 
>> investigation,I found that file and 5 others that were not 
>> updating to the latest version.
>> I manually updated them and all works fine now.
>> My question is why didn't the Tortoise SVN Update do this ?
>> Do I have something in it's setup wrong? I couldn't see where.
>> The files in question had date codes from 7/15/06 so it 
>> should have been pretty easy for Tortoise to see this.
>>
>> Any one have a clue?
>>
>> Dave - N4DWK
>>
>> ___
>> FlexRadio mailing list
>> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
>> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
>> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
>> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
>>
> 

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] Digital transceiver

[Charles Greene]

Jim,

Tnx for reply.  I downloaded SVN 683 this morning, and it does the 
same thing.  It's easy enough to unclick Tune, which ends it. Chas

At 09:37 AM 9/19/2006, Jim, W4ATK wrote:
>Hi Charles,
>
> I noticed the same thing here and dropped back to 677. When 
> I switch to
>by-pass to use the SG-237 on my delta loop, this is normal behavior. I
>suspect someone just forgot to pick up the "DONE" flag from the Z-100
>autotuner.
>
>Jim, W4ATK
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles Greene
>Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 9:01 PM
>To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
>Subject: [Flexradio] Digital transceiver
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I am running SVN 682 with MixW and it is the best digital transceiver
>I have ever used.  Great on other modes too.  I have a
>question.  When I go to tune, it stays in tune and does not complete
>and go back to receive.  Is this a feature or a bug?
>
>73,  Chas, W1CG
>
>
>
>___
>FlexRadio mailing list
>FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
>http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
>Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
>FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] SVN683

[Jim, W4ATK]

Wow! It took a moment for this senior citizen to work it all out, but what
an enhancement.

FWIW, I create new directories for each SVN and then simply import the DB.
It works great here. Everything updates cleanly.

Very Cool! Take that KenSu!

Jim, W4ATK


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

[Thompson_Peter]

If the files in question are dlls, I would guess that they were in use
(loaded) at the time you attempted to do the svn update; svn would be
unable to delete the old version as part of the replacement operation.
Was PowerSDR running at that time?

Pete, N3EVL 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Kiefer
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:05 AM
> To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: [Flexradio] SVN: 683
> 
> I have a question for the brain trust.
> 
> I updated to SVN:683 and Power SDR would not start up after 
> that, telling me something about not being able to insert 
> receive frequency or something into DttSP.dll. Upon further 
> investigation,I found that file and 5 others that were not 
> updating to the latest version.
> I manually updated them and all works fine now.
> My question is why didn't the Tortoise SVN Update do this ?
> Do I have something in it's setup wrong? I couldn't see where.
> The files in question had date codes from 7/15/06 so it 
> should have been pretty easy for Tortoise to see this.
> 
> Any one have a clue?
> 
> Dave - N4DWK
> 
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
> 

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

[Klaus Lohmann]

Dave and Ignacio,
thanks for the information. Same observations here - now everything is working 
fine. It´s again a new radio - unbelievable. Thanks to all who made that happen!
73 - Klaus, DK7XL

 "EB4APL" <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Dave Kiefer wrote:
> > I have a question for the brain trust.
> >
> > I updated to SVN:683 and Power SDR would not start up
> > after that, telling me something about not being able to insert
> > receive frequency or something into DttSP.dll. Upon further 
> > investigation,I found that file and 5 others that were not updating to 
> > the latest version.
> > I manually updated them and all works fine now.
> > My question is why didn't the Tortoise SVN Update do this ?
> > Do I have something in it's setup wrong? I couldn't see where.
> > The files in question had date codes from 7/15/06 so it should have been 
> > pretty easy for Tortoise to see this.
> >
> > Any one have a clue?
> >
> > Dave - N4DWK
> >
> > 
> 
> Hi, I suffered the same incident and used the same fix. (thank you Dave).
> My previous dll was dated 08/04/2006.
> 
> -- 
> 73 de Ignacio, EB4APL
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> FlexRadio mailing list
> mailto:FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
> 
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060920/d012d4f2/attachment.html
 
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

[Flexradio] 683 Zip Download

[A.R.S. - W5AMI]

To all non-Tortoise users ;)

I have zipped SVN 683 and it is ready for download at:

http://w5ami.net/683.zip

This is the SVN that contain the new sub RX feature.  Really cool stuff!

Brian w5ami

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Re: [Flexradio] SVN: 683

[EB4APL]

Dave Kiefer wrote:
> I have a question for the brain trust.
>
> I updated to SVN:683 and Power SDR would not start up
> after that, telling me something about not being able to insert
> receive frequency or something into DttSP.dll. Upon further 
> investigation,I found that file and 5 others that were not updating to 
> the latest version.
> I manually updated them and all works fine now.
> My question is why didn't the Tortoise SVN Update do this ?
> Do I have something in it's setup wrong? I couldn't see where.
> The files in question had date codes from 7/15/06 so it should have been 
> pretty easy for Tortoise to see this.
>
> Any one have a clue?
>
> Dave - N4DWK
>
> 

Hi, I suffered the same incident and used the same fix. (thank you Dave).
My previous dll was dated 08/04/2006.

-- 
73 de Ignacio, EB4APL



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com