[Flightgear-devel] RE: Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 17
--- Martin wrote: Mostyn Gale wrote: In the meantime I will just do a few warmup projects, i.e. A Robinson R22, Piper PA25 Pawnee and Cessna 152. Luckily you decided to choose the C152. In contrast to the C150 people already consider the former to be a real aircraft whereas the C150 is pretty close to an UL ;-) --- I chose the C152 because it would be fairly easy to model. In any case I would imagine that the C152 and C150 would be pretty close in performance. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] RE: Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 17
Mostyn Gale wrote: I chose the C152 because it would be fairly easy to model. In any case I would imagine that the C152 and C150 would be pretty close in performance. Oh, the C152 has 20 % more engine power. People who know both aircraft told me this makes a significant difference. Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
