[Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Aircraft/Lockheed1049/Models

2005-11-27 Thread Martin Spott
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
 Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/Lockheed1049/Models
 In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv7950/Models
 
 Modified Files:
   Lockheed1049_twa.xml 
 Log Message:
 
 Thierry:
 
 Sets correctly the VRP at the nose :

Yep, the VRP appears actually to be located at the nose, but the offset
to the CG is still missing  :-)
Have a try, look at the aircraft from an outside view (chase view w/o
yaw), activate the HUD and see where the center of the HUD points at:
It points at the nose whereas it _should_ point at somewhere near the
wing root, actually at the CG. Currently the FDM still 'thinks' the CG
is at the nose.

Don't get me wrong, I don't want to hurt anyone, I just want to remind
that the issue hasn't been solved yet.

Cheers,
Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Aircraft/Lockheed1049/Models

2005-11-27 Thread Dave Culp
On Sunday 27 November 2005 05:19 pm, Martin Spott wrote:

  Sets correctly the VRP at the nose :

 Yep, the VRP appears actually to be located at the nose, but the offset
 to the CG is still missing  :-)
 Have a try, look at the aircraft from an outside view (chase view w/o
 yaw), activate the HUD and see where the center of the HUD points at:
 It points at the nose whereas it _should_ point at somewhere near the
 wing root, actually at the CG. Currently the FDM still 'thinks' the CG
 is at the nose.


One thing that may be confusing is that the VRP setting given by aeromatic is 
wrong.   In the JSBSim configuration file If the CG location is X, Y, Z,  
then the VRP location is -X, -Y, -Z.I had thought that AC_VRP defines the 
location of the VRP, however it actually defines the location of the VRP 
*from* the CG (?).   I never noticed it in the T-38 and other smaller 
airplanes because the effect is hard to see.  In a big airplane like the 1049 
you can see it.

The above may seem authoritative, but I'm really only 90% sure it's correct :)
I know you have all been waiting impatiently for another VRP thread.

Dave



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d