Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re:FGFS easter egg

2002-05-21 Thread Billy Verreynne 

C. Hotchkiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 So, what should we consider adding into the program to be our
 first official egg, a parody on the Ever-ready Bunny? (The project keeps
 going and going and ... and never stops.)


Charlie, you know what happened to that Bunny? It died. Of sexual exhaustion.
Some dork put the batteries in wrong way around. Instead of going and going, it
kept on coming and coming. They say it was not a pretty sight.

As for an easter egg - create this little airfield on the top of Everest. Next
to it plant a couple of palm trees and create a few banana huts. Off to the
side, a billboard displaying something suitable. :-)

--
Billy



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re:FGFS easter egg

2002-05-21 Thread Richard Kirkcaldy 



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
 Erik Hofman
 Sent: 21 May 2002 09:42
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re:FGFS easter egg
 
 
 C. Hotchkiss wrote:
  Actually, what we have had was not an Easter egg, but a surprise 
  improvement that might someday be the norm. Program Easter eggs are 
  supposed to be hidden and activated by an arcane sequence 
 of operator 
  inputs. So, what should we consider adding into the program 
 to be our 
  first official egg, a parody on the Ever-ready Bunny? (The project 
  keeps going and going and ... and never stops.)
 
 Area 51 of course.
 

Do you really need an Easter Egg?  If you do, please make sure it is
Windows compatible - because I had 24 hours of being unable to use
FlightSim, which was incredibly boring.

-- 
Richard Kirkcaldy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re:FGFS easter egg

2002-05-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen 

On Tue, 21 May 2002 10:10:53 +0200, 
Billy Verreynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
00f101c2009f$0995af80$[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 C. Hotchkiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 As for an easter egg - create this little airfield on the top of
 Everest. Next to it plant a couple of palm trees and create a few
 banana huts. Off to the side, a billboard displaying something
 suitable. :-)

..this and Erik's Area 51, I like.

..question is, should we put these in as an 
--with-easter-eggs compile and runtime option?

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

[Flightgear-devel] Re:FGFS easter egg

2002-05-20 Thread C. Hotchkiss 

Actually, what we have had was not an Easter egg, but a surprise
improvement that might someday be the norm. Program Easter eggs are
supposed to be hidden and activated by an arcane sequence of operator
inputs. So, what should we consider adding into the program to be our
first official egg, a parody on the Ever-ready Bunny? (The project keeps
going and going and ... and never stops.)

Regards,

Charlie H.

--
C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot;
C++ makes it harder, but when you do, it blows
away your whole leg. - Bjarne Stroustrup



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel