[Flightgear-devel] Cygwin/Terragear/nurbs problem
Hi Ralf, My terragear source doesn't include that README (I've got the 0.9.8 release as opposed to a CVS version). What version were you using? Any chance you ould point me at the README and replacement .h files? I've also managed to trash my cygwin trying to go back to gcc 3.3.3, having finally managed to work out how to do it (I was using a mirror that didn't keep previous images). So, one step forward, two steps back right now :( I also hit the "unqualified-id" in stl_bvector. I got around it by remove the "std::" qualifier on a couple of types IIRC. Seemed to compile OK, but as I've not got anything running -Stuart ___ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Cygwin/Terragear/nurbs problem
Buchanan, Stuart schrieb: Hi Ralf, My terragear source doesn't include that README (I've got the 0.9.8 release as opposed to a CVS version). What version were you using? Any chance you ould point me at the README and replacement .h files? The patch is here: http://cvs.terragear.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/TerraGear/PATCH-nurbs%2B%2B-3.0.11-with-gcc-3.4.x?rev=1.1&cvsroot=TerraGear-0.0&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup and the README is here: http://cvs.terragear.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/TerraGear/README.nurbs%2B%2B?rev=1.2&cvsroot=TerraGear-0.0&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup alternatively you could install CVS on cygwin and checkout the current CVS version of TerraGear ;-) Ralf ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] OT: Mojave, CA
Jim Wilson wrote: BTW great pictures Curt. Sharp looking crew as well :-) And a very exciting flight story. The scariest jet airline flight I've been on was one that landed on Corfu and it was 100% routine. I have serious doubts that this jet could have stopped on the runway if an engine was out and beyond one end of the runway is water and buildings (houses, etc) on the other end. No room for overruns. When the aircraft finally braked to a stop, I actually thought we were a little off the end of the runway from the poor viewing angle I had in the cabin. The takeoff later was equally interesting, although by then I had convinced myself that they did this every day and we would make it, which we did. I had a flight out of Cuzco, Peru (we were up to see Macchu Pichu) that was interesting. The Cuzco airport is up about 11,500' MSL and we were flying out of there in an old beater Boeing 727. I had a stop watch so I started it when we began our take off roll. We got airborn and everything was normal, but because of the geography of the area, 5 full minutes into flight we were still seeing terrain straight out our window and still very close. That's not something I'm used to seeing around here in Minnesota. Anyway after all the exciting stories, is there anything more you are able to say about the simulator project mentioned top of the page? Let's see. The NTPS has some simulator software that is their own proprietary product. The strength of their software is that it is really well suited and tuned towards developing and evaluating the performance of a modern fly-by-wire aircraft (and is well proven in action.) However, it has only very basic out the window graphics. I'm doing a (hopefully quick little) project to build an interface from their software to FlightGear in order to use FlightGear as the visuals. Regards, Curt. -- Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt HumanFIRST Program http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/ FlightGear Project http://www.flightgear.org Unique text:2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] OT: Mojave, CA
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 16:10:54 -0500, Curtis wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The Draken is a really impressive bird, especially considering the era > in which it was designed. The US is pretty cocky about stuff invented > over here, but the Draken had some really impressive specs for it's day. ..me, I'm just wondering how their J22 would have done at altitude with turbos off interned B-17F|G's. http://anycities.com/user/j22/j22/ ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] OT: Mojave, CA
On Friday 05 Aug 2005 22:10, Curtis L. Olson wrote: > Lee Elliott wrote: > >Liked the 3 engine 747 :) > > > >The Draken is an interesting a/c - I saw the one at Duxford, > > here in the UK, and was surprised at how close to the ground > > the wing trailing edge was. When looked at from the back I > > rather thought it looked like a huge moth. > > I don't know how much more work I'll do with the National Test > Pilot School (pending the results of the current small > project) :-) but if things go well, there may be some modeling > work that needs to get done at some point. Any interest in > that sort of thing, or do you keep busy enough with your day > job and hobbies? > > The Draken is a really impressive bird, especially considering > the era in which it was designed. The US is pretty cocky > about stuff invented over here, but the Draken had some really > impressive specs for it's day. > > To be honest, I stared and squinted at the real scene for the > longest time trying to figure out if my eyes were playing > tricks on me or what. It wasn't until I got to see the full > digital picture that I figured out the 747 hump was behind the > DC-10/MD-11. :-) > > Curt. Just about all of the Swedish jets from the Tunnen onwards have been pretty interesting and capable aircraft for their day. Almost surprisingly so for such a relatively small nation. LeeE ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
