Re: [Flightgear-devel] Clouds3D and Matrices in general

2003-08-03 Thread Andreas
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 02:42:34PM -0400, Norman Vine wrote:
 Why don't you just 'try it' and determine that for yourself :-)
 
 see
 http://www.vso.cape.com/~nhv/files/fgfs/clouds/

On a side note, check the propeller on this one:
http://www.vso.cape.com/~nhv/files/fgfs/clouds/fgfs-screen-005.jpg


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] do you guys know this set of data?

2003-08-14 Thread Andreas
A guy called Rafael is using this dataset (url below) (the South America part)
to improve the terrain in MS Flight Simulator. Here are some before-after
screenshots of some parts of Brazil:

http://www.aerovirtual.com.br/br-mesh.html

I asked him (Rafael) where he got this data, and he gave me this
URL:

http://edcwww.cr.usgs.gov/pub/data/srtm/

He also said he uses flightgear, perhaps he is even subscribed to this list :)
He also thinks flightgear could benefit from this data (but I suppose he
prefers FS for now). Does anybody else know how to make flightgear benefit
from this?


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear Features on the web

2003-10-08 Thread Andreas
  http://www.flightgear.org/features.html

To which version does this apply? 0.9.2? Or CVS?


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] 0.9.3: slDSP: getBufferInfo: Broken pipe

2003-11-15 Thread Andreas
I'm getting a lot of these fatal errors in flightgear 0.9.3:

Takeoff report for LEFT_MAIN
  Distance traveled:1456.4441 ft, 443.9242 meters
  Distance traveled (over 50'): 2180.1366 ft, 664.5056 meters
-(a few minutes later)
slDSP: getBufferInfo: Broken pipe
-hangs (sound and image, the game freezes)

I've searched the archives and some people had this with earlier versions,
but no definite solution.


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: 0.9.3: slDSP: getBufferInfo: Broken pipe

2003-11-15 Thread Andreas
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:25:05PM +0100, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
 plib asks the Linux kernel (which version?) for the amount

2.6.0-test5

 of free space in the oss playback buffer. The kernel responds
 with Broken pipe.
I'd say that the sound driver (which? oss? alsa?) for your

alsa, whichever version came with that kernel

 card (which?) is broken. Try to update your sound drivers.

Intel Corp. 82801DB AC'97 Audio (rev 02)
That's Asus' P4PE onboard audio.


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: 0.9.3: slDSP: getBufferInfo: Broken pipe

2003-11-15 Thread Andreas
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:38:32PM +0100, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
 OK. Can't tell you anything specific about this combination,
 but I'm running an ac97 based card (SiS7012) and I also had
 problems with early 2.[56] kernels. There were some changes
 to ac97 since test5 and I recommend to try 2.6.0-test9 which

Great

 works very well (apart from analog/ns558 joystick hats :-)

Uhoh, not so great ;)


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: 0.9.3: slDSP: getBufferInfo: Broken pipe

2003-11-23 Thread Andreas
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:38:32PM +0100, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
 problems with early 2.[56] kernels. There were some changes
 to ac97 since test5 and I recommend to try 2.6.0-test9 which
 works very well (apart from analog/ns558 joystick hats :-)

Just for the mailing list archives, I switched to 2.6.0-test9 and
the sound problem is gone, thanks!
(I still have to see about that joystick hat, though)


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] The Rant

2004-11-06 Thread Andreas
Oliver C. wrote:
The fact that FlightGear doesn't have aircraft lightning support doesn't 
matter. 
Any idea if.someone is working on this? Landing at night without lights 
is quite frustrating. Almost as frustrating as the lack of aircraft 
shadows (no, there is no need for a cannon like OpenRT to produce 
shadows, is there?).

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: X-Plane on Linux

2004-11-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
It will indeed be interesting to see how X plane performs on linux.

Regarding the 6min limit, it was always there on the demo.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d