Re: [Flightgear-devel] enable-auto-coordination
Bohnert Paul wrote: Hi All, I found --enable-auto-coordination does not work with CH Pro Pedals. The rudder jumps back and forth between center and aileron position. It works as expected with the pedals disconnected. I have my joy stick twist axis commented out. With --enable-auto-coordination I expect the rudder to follow the aileron and ignore all other inputs. Would someone please take a look at this. OS Fedora 8. FlightGear CVS. Hi The likely problem is that the pedals are still generating some little input (noise) and when several devices control the same axis, the last input provided is used (cat /dev/input/js(?) to watch input, ctrl-c to exit). Either disable them, edit the configuration file and remove the axis or change the name or best of all, disable auto-coord and use the pedals all the time :) Cheers, Tiago - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] enable-auto-coordination
* Bohnert Paul -- Wednesday 30 January 2008: It works as expected with the pedals disconnected. You can avoid that by setting --prop:input/joysticks/js[1]=0 (This isn't an Easter Egg. The 0 is only an invalid joystick configuration, but fgfs refuses to overwrite it nevertheless, so joystick #1 will be ignored.) Apart from that I agree with Tiago's analysis. m. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Inconsistent FGNetFDM size?
I tried the option to write out the native_fdm to a file from the Windows 1.0 release of flightgear, and loaded the result into matlab. Initially I thought there was a structure with a regular size of 408 bytes, and I was able to extract altitude correctly from the first few dozen instances, but that seemed to change as the simulation progressed and it all got out of sync. Is there a byte or two being sent in addition to the FGNetFDM structure that is not sent every update? Thanks, Luke - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Inconsistent FGNetFDM size?
You may want to double check that you are reading and writing the file in binary mode on windows. This doesn't make a difference on linux where the feature was developed, but dos's carriage return/new-line translation might be biting you? Curt. On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 4:03 PM, wsacul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried the option to write out the native_fdm to a file from the Windows 1.0 release of flightgear, and loaded the result into matlab. Initially I thought there was a structure with a regular size of 408 bytes, and I was able to extract altitude correctly from the first few dozen instances, but that seemed to change as the simulation progressed and it all got out of sync. Is there a byte or two being sent in addition to the FGNetFDM structure that is not sent every update? Thanks, Luke - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] trees
hi stuart, i have missed you on irc today. and i wanted to tell you that indeed the second patch is much better in terms of memory usage. it saves 80 megs of allocations compared to your first patch :-) and considering it looks even prettier than the first one... congratulations! -till On Monday 28 January 2008, Stuart Buchanan wrote: The current patch is a bit better for memory usage IIRC, but it is still quite hefty - a side-effect of generating all the trees at once for the tile. -Stuart - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Inconsistent FGNetFDM size?
Files generated with flightgear in Linux don't give me any problems, it's just the official windows build. On an unrelated note, the sim behaves strangely when the initial position is set above 64,000 feet. The plane will drop as I would expect but then stops (I think right about 64,000 feet, but I haven't checked that)- is there an altitude limit to jsbsim? Thanks, Luke You may want to double check that you are reading and writing the file in binary mode on windows. This doesn't make a difference on linux where the feature was developed, but dos's carriage return/new-line translation might be biting you? Curt. On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 4:03 PM, wsacul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried the option to write out the native_fdm to a file from the Windows 1.0 release of flightgear, and loaded the result into matlab. Initially I thought there was a structure with a regular size of 408 bytes, and I was able to extract altitude correctly from the first few dozen instances, but that seemed to change as the simulation progressed and it all got out of sync. Is there a byte or two being sent in addition to the FGNetFDM structure that is not sent every update? Thanks, Luke - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
