Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear update that fixed the screens
> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote: > > Btw Jon: > > Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees. > > Here, too. This is a result of my experimenting with the multiple FDM feature again - which is not ready, but which should be innocuous. Apparently it's not. Did you use the JSBSim.cxx from JSBSim CVS? I think I can fix this fairly easily. > > I also think JSBSim in FlightGear is creating initfile.xml:s again, > has > > anyone else seen that? > > Yes, doing it here, too. But only after a reset. Now I need to remember how I fixed this before. Are you using the JSBSim.cxx from JSBSim CVS? Jon -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear presentation on the LinuxTag expo,
Can I come? I mean, on MP ;) 2009/6/24, Martin Spott : > Hi, just a little reminder for those who missed the original > announcement: The usual crowd is presenting FlightGear on the LinuxTag > expo these days (http://www.linuxtag.org/). Typically we are around > EDDF or EDDI on the MP servers between 07:00 and 16:00 UTC: > > http://foxtrot.mgras.net/bitmap/FGFS/LinuxTag-2009_33.png > > Feel free to join us there for some serious flying well, at least > we're trying to educate our guests pilots to behave accordingly ;-) > > Cheers, > Martin. > -- > Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! > -- > > -- > ___ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear presentation on the LinuxTag expo,
Hi, just a little reminder for those who missed the original announcement: The usual crowd is presenting FlightGear on the LinuxTag expo these days (http://www.linuxtag.org/). Typically we are around EDDF or EDDI on the MP servers between 07:00 and 16:00 UTC: http://foxtrot.mgras.net/bitmap/FGFS/LinuxTag-2009_33.png Feel free to join us there for some serious flying well, at least we're trying to educate our guests pilots to behave accordingly ;-) Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after tod ay's simgear update that fixed the screens
> We're getting more careful about properties. No longer are referenced > properties merely created if they do not exist. That can lead to errors. A > referenced property needs to already exist, or it needs to be declared. What makes me wonder is, that after adding ice/wing right at the beginning of the aerodynamics section, I get the warning "Property ice/wing is already defined." The system complains "its missing" if I don't declare it and it complains "it''s already there" if I define it. It's like buying new shoes for my wife - no chance to get the right ones... Torsten -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear update that fixed the screens
We're getting more careful about properties. No longer are referenced properties merely created if they do not exist. That can lead to errors. A referenced property needs to already exist, or it needs to be declared. Jon -Original Message- From: Torsten Dreyer Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 11:48 AM To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear update that fixed the screens > Rather long title, eh? :D > I'm getting an error with the Seneca II. "IndependenVar property, > ice/wing in Table definition is not defined." > That's all. > Even with debug logs, the rest of it is just JSBSim aerodynamic tables. > They stop in that error. Hmm something in JSBSim has changed that requires the property ice/wing to be declared. This is now done, but surprisingly JSBSim now complains that variable is already defined!? At least the Seneca is now working again - just ignore the warning message. Torsten -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear update that fixed the screens
> Rather long title, eh? :D > I'm getting an error with the Seneca II. "IndependenVar property, > ice/wing in Table definition is not defined." > That's all. > Even with debug logs, the rest of it is just JSBSim aerodynamic tables. > They stop in that error. Hmm something in JSBSim has changed that requires the property ice/wing to be declared. This is now done, but surprisingly JSBSim now complains that variable is already defined!? At least the Seneca is now working again - just ignore the warning message. Torsten -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seneca II not working after today's simgear update that fixed the screens
> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote: > > Btw Jon: > > Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees. > > Here, too. > > > I also think JSBSim in FlightGear is creating initfile.xml:s again, > has > > anyone else seen that? > > Yes, doing it here, too. But only after a reset. > > > Cheers, > > > > Anders OK, Thanks, Jon -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] startup.nas
* Detlef Faber -- 6/23/2009 9:17 PM: > Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2009, 14:25 +0200 schrieb Melchior FRANZ: > > is now broken since Detlefs recent changes. > > I'm innocent on this. You sure meant someone else ;-) Whoops, indeed, sorry. (That was probably because Torsten and Detlef are both German first names which aren't used in Austria. :-) m. -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Simgear-cvslogs] CVS: SimGear/simgear/structure SGWeakPtr.hxx, NONE, 1.1 SGWeakReferenced.hxx, NONE, 1.1 Makefile.am, 1.10, 1.11 SGAtomic.cxx, 1.2, 1.3 SGAtomic.hxx, 1.3, 1.4 S
On 24 Jun 2009, at 06:19, Mathias Froehlich wrote: > Log Message: > Provide a thread safe SGWeakPtr implementation. > Extend SGAtomic with atomic exchange and add. > Import updates from the original implementation of that in OpenFDM. An observation: this change has stopped SGAtomic being (by default) a proxy for osg/OpenThreads Atomic. There's a downside to this - OpenThreads Atomic has a specialisation (not of the template kind, but the #ifdef kind) for OS-X atomics - _OPENTHREADS_ATOMIC_USE_BSD_ATOMIC. On Mac we're still on GCC version 4.0 by default [1], so we don't get the GCC built-in case for SGAtomic and friends - and will fall back to a pthread-mutex implementation. I know there's an argument for having Simgear not depend on OSG, which I agree with, and I know it's awkward to depend on OpenThreads when it's typically only distributed as part of the OSG tree, it just seems like a step backwards - I'd prefer to delegate all thread support to OpenThreads and maintain less code ourselves. [1] - yes, it's ridiculous that the stock compiler is still 4.0. A newer version (4.2) is available, but I'm hesitant to switch to it when the system compiler is still 4.0. James -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
