Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fw: CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd)
Hello Thorsten, Many thanks for your help. It's better now but the FlightGear is blocked to the step of loading scenery for all kind of aircrafts. Could you please help me? You'll find here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Sw7OM3piEq-TUhHnIRTcKw3lpQT2QUrdApcYYPX8KdM/edit a screenshot of the program the command DOS. Cheers, Fatima -Message d'origine- De : ThorstenB [mailto:bre...@gmail.com] Envoyé : lundi 28 novembre 2011 17:26 À : FlightGear developers discussions Cc : Iervolino Fatima Objet : Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fw: CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd) Am 28.11.2011 16:57, schrieb Alan Teeder: This was sent directly to me. Does anyone know what her problem is likely to be? (I, and others , have already given several answers to this question on the FG forum) After having compiling in DEBUG RELEASE mode FlightGear under Windows, I get systematically an error while I'm trying to launch fgfs under Windows command DOS. “Fatal error: Unrecognized flight model 'jsb', cannot init flight dynamics model.” Alan, please add a forum link when cross posting: http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=35t=14371hilit=jsb With the introduction of CMake it is possible to enable/disable the different FDMs. The JSBSim and YASim are enabled by default, only the LARCSim and UIUC flight dynamics are excluded from the build by default. As Anders said on the forum, something must have gone wrong while configuring the build, so somehow the default was changed, and JSBSim support disabled and excluded from the build. Either remove CMakeCache.txt and run cmake again (so the correct defaults are taken), or run cmake -DENABLE_JSBSIM:BOOL=ON to override the current local setting. cheers, Thorsten -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fw: CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd)
Hi Fatima, that's not an aircraft-dependent problem - you seem to have a fundamental issue with loading the scenery itself. May well be related to the PNG lib / malformed chunk warnings in your console - this could be scenery textures which fail to load. Maybe check which PNG library you're using - and if the files in the data directory are ok. You can also try to add this to your fgfs command-line: --prop:sim/sceneryloaded-override=1 That won't fix the underlying issue, but it will tear down the splash screen immediately instead of waiting for scenery to be loaded. Looking at the scenery may help seeing what the issue is - i.e. do you get any scenery at all, are only (some) textures missing etc. cheers, Thorsten Am 29.11.2011 13:49, schrieb Iervolino Fatima: Hello Thorsten, Many thanks for your help. It's better now but the FlightGear is blocked to the step of loading scenery for all kind of aircrafts. Could you please help me? You'll find here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Sw7OM3piEq-TUhHnIRTcKw3lpQT2QUrdApcYYPX8KdM/edit a screenshot of the program the command DOS. Cheers, Fatima -Message d'origine- De : ThorstenB [mailto:bre...@gmail.com] Envoyé : lundi 28 novembre 2011 17:26 À : FlightGear developers discussions Cc : Iervolino Fatima Objet : Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fw: CMake, tomorrow (Sunday 23rd) Am 28.11.2011 16:57, schrieb Alan Teeder: This was sent directly to me. Does anyone know what her problem is likely to be? (I, and others , have already given several answers to this question on the FG forum) After having compiling in DEBUG RELEASE mode FlightGear under Windows, I get systematically an error while I'm trying to launch fgfs under Windows command DOS. “Fatal error: Unrecognized flight model 'jsb', cannot init flight dynamics model.” Alan, please add a forum link when cross posting: http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=35t=14371hilit=jsb With the introduction of CMake it is possible to enable/disable the different FDMs. The JSBSim and YASim are enabled by default, only the LARCSim and UIUC flight dynamics are excluded from the build by default. As Anders said on the forum, something must have gone wrong while configuring the build, so somehow the default was changed, and JSBSim support disabled and excluded from the build. Either remove CMakeCache.txt and run cmake again (so the correct defaults are taken), or run cmake -DENABLE_JSBSIM:BOOL=ON to override the current local setting. cheers, Thorsten -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Marketting of 2.6.0 via FS Break podcast
Hi All, I came across the FS Break podcast (http://www.fsbreak.net/) just the other day, which discusses flight simulation - mainly FS-X and X-Plane. I think it would be worth arranging some interview/announcement for when the 2.6.0 release comes out. I'm happy to run this, but thought it would be worth having someone else on as well to give a different perspective. Anyone else interested? -Stuart -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Marketting of 2.6.0 via FS Break podcast
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote: I came across the FS Break podcast (http://www.fsbreak.net/) just the other day, which discusses flight simulation - mainly FS-X and X-Plane. I think it would be worth arranging some interview/announcement for when the 2.6.0 release comes out. I'm happy to run this, but thought it would be worth having someone else on as well to give a different perspective. Anyone else interested? Hi Stuart, This sounds like a great idea. Please let me know what I can do to help. Curt. -- Curtis Olson: http://www.atiak.com - http://aem.umn.edu/~uav/ http://www.flightgear.org - http://gallinazo.flightgear.org -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Southwest Colorado Scenery - beta 4
Also, note the scenery is not working because of specific problems with the cs_scrub.shp file. There are no elevation problems with the SRTM, for whatever reason the Scrub file is not being turned into scenery properly. Because I am using ignore-landmass, it is being turned into ocean, which of course is at 0 elevation. Cheers John -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Marketting of 2.6.0 via FS Break podcast
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:26:10 -0600, Curtis wrote in message cahtsj_cssswjbe6x4i9v_kpeg3ukh_ckzw4ul8cvfqxlb9c...@mail.gmail.com: On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote: I came across the FS Break podcast (http://www.fsbreak.net/) just the other day, which discusses flight simulation - mainly FS-X and X-Plane. I think it would be worth arranging some interview/announcement for when the 2.6.0 release comes out. I'm happy to run this, but thought it would be worth having someone else on as well to give a different perspective. Anyone else interested? Hi Stuart, This sounds like a great idea. Please let me know what I can do to help. Curt. ..first, have the podcaster guy lose the white paint in that annoying big ass white banner background. Banner text is ok, and watermark text with a transplarent background, would be nice _and_ sexy. ..second, have the podcaster guy get his face acreage outta the cockpit window view and into some vacant panel space, say next to the radio stack. (We can control this on a per view basis from FG?) ..third, have the podcaster guy make short teaser videos to the teaser points he or we want made, rather than these, er, overlength filings. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Docs installation with cmake
I've just noticed that the README files are being installed to /usr/doc since the switch to cmake. This should be /usr/doc/flightgear -- Jon Stockill li...@stockill.net -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Docs installation with cmake
On 29.11.2011 23:59, Jon Stockill wrote: I've just noticed that the README files are being installed to /usr/doc since the switch to cmake. This should be /usr/doc/flightgear Right. Also noticed this recently. The correct location also depends on the (Linux) distribution, i.e. OpenSuSE wants /usr/share/flightgear/... Luckily CMake can automatically provide the correct location (GNUInstallDirs = DOCDIR), we just need to use that variable in our makefile. I'll have a look at this some time - unless James... cheers, Thorsten -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
