Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixpoints navaids

2011-11-12 Thread HB-GRAL
Am 10.11.11 12:14, schrieb HB-GRAL:


 Assuming the fix table should contain VFR waypoints mainly, another
 question might be if the fix table can be filtered (only for the map)
 into waypoints containing only VPXYZ-Point-Naming and others
 containing numbers ? Is this a bad idea (for the map) ?


Please tell me if this a bad idea. I just added a filter to the fix data 
on the map: only 5 letters without numbers is shown (as a waypoint) -- 
map.fgx.ch, activating fix layer

Thanks, Yves

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixpoints navaids

2011-11-10 Thread James Turner

On 10 Nov 2011, at 07:36, HB-GRAL wrote:

 - Approach Fix
 - Intermediate Fix
 - Final Fix
 - MAPT
 - Step down
 - Fly-by
 - Fly-over
 - Co-located
 - Speed limit (?)
 
 Is there any possibility to classify the bare 8.50 fix database 
 somehow, i.e. by name ? I can also start to provide other sources, but 
 then the fix database needs updates outside xplane. Another question is, 
 are current fixes also used for AI Traffic ?

Some classification would be useful, but all the thins I think you're actually 
asking for, are related to approach  departure procedures, AKA SIDs / STARs 
... or whatever the correct terminology is today :)

And in that regard, there's other sources data available, which have a much 
richer data-syntax (XML) that encodes most of the things you mention above 
(speeds, fly-over vs fly-by, IAF / FAF points, step down altitudes). FlightGear 
already supports reading one of these formats (the Level-D 767 format), and 
there are files available here:

http://www.navdata.at/php/sidstar/dl_list.php?addon=LDS767

If you add, inside your Airports/I/C/A structure, the files for an airport, 
renamed to ICAO.procedures.xml, then the route-manager will load and use it. 
(based on runway, you can select  a SID or STAR, and the waypoints are added to 
your route) At runtime, it's the various flightgear::Waypt subclasses that 
model the information mentioned above. And the GPS will attempt to fly the 
procedures, although compliance with altitude / speed limits is currently 
missing.

Now, one step would be to make the AI traffic use this data if available, but 
there other issue, I've been busy on other areas since I added this code, so it 
has bugs - eg holds aren't support correctly, neither are DME arcs, and some 
DME intercepts don't work. All fixable, but it hasn't been a priority, since 
the feature is deliberately not exposed too loudly right now :)

(Adding support for other input formats is possible, the Level-D format was 
simply the sanest of the ones offered on navdata.at. Also note the files are 
free to download, but GPL incompatible, so we couldn't ship them in the core 
data package)

James


--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixpoints navaids

2011-11-10 Thread HB-GRAL
Am 10.11.11 09:50, schrieb James Turner:

 On 10 Nov 2011, at 07:36, HB-GRAL wrote:

 - Approach Fix
 - Intermediate Fix
 - Final Fix
 - MAPT
 - Step down
 - Fly-by
 - Fly-over
 - Co-located
 - Speed limit (?)

 Is there any possibility to classify the bare 8.50 fix database
 somehow, i.e. by name ? I can also start to provide other sources, but
 then the fix database needs updates outside xplane. Another question is,
 are current fixes also used for AI Traffic ?

 Some classification would be useful, but all the thins I think you're 
 actually asking for, are related to approach  departure procedures, AKA SIDs 
 / STARs ... or whatever the correct terminology is today :)

 And in that regard, there's other sources data available, which have a much 
 richer data-syntax (XML) that encodes most of the things you mention above 
 (speeds, fly-over vs fly-by, IAF / FAF points, step down altitudes). 
 FlightGear already supports reading one of these formats (the Level-D 767 
 format), and there are files available here:

   http://www.navdata.at/php/sidstar/dl_list.php?addon=LDS767

 If you add, inside your Airports/I/C/A structure, the files for an airport, 
 renamed to ICAO.procedures.xml, then the route-manager will load and use it. 
 (based on runway, you can select  a SID or STAR, and the waypoints are added 
 to your route) At runtime, it's the various flightgear::Waypt subclasses that 
 model the information mentioned above. And the GPS will attempt to fly the 
 procedures, although compliance with altitude / speed limits is currently 
 missing.

 Now, one step would be to make the AI traffic use this data if available, but 
 there other issue, I've been busy on other areas since I added this code, so 
 it has bugs - eg holds aren't support correctly, neither are DME arcs, and 
 some DME intercepts don't work. All fixable, but it hasn't been a priority, 
 since the feature is deliberately not exposed too loudly right now :)

 (Adding support for other input formats is possible, the Level-D format was 
 simply the sanest of the ones offered on navdata.at. Also note the files are 
 free to download, but GPL incompatible, so we couldn't ship them in the core 
 data package)

 James



Hi James

I just noticed that my confusion belongs to looking to the wrong table 
yesterday in my navaid database.

Some ILS markers are separated in 8.50 data, and I will add this to the 
map. And for further SID/STAR there is a GPL source from former DAFIF 
data. Looks like this one is also used by ivao/vatsim. Is this data in 
the scenery too? I will give it a try for the map.

Assuming the fix table should contain VFR waypoints mainly, another 
question might be if the fix table can be filtered (only for the map) 
into waypoints containing only VPXYZ-Point-Naming and others 
containing numbers ? Is this a bad idea (for the map) ?

And when this all fails ... there are two other sources for navaids, 
GPL, which I used this summer for getting some other map data. But 
mainly I will try to follow original 8.50 xplane data, because then it 
will be in fg scenery too I think.

And we are not alone. As I read xplane users following xplane 
data/routes are a very special celestial phenomena for some virtual ATCs.

Cheers, Yves

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] Fixpoints navaids

2011-11-09 Thread HB-GRAL
Hi all

I tried to add 8.50 .dat version fixes to my map (map.fgx.ch) 
yesterday. I see that the database contains the name of the fix/waypoint 
and coordinates and no further cols. Wouldn’t some classification be 
useful, i.e.

- Approach Fix
- Intermediate Fix
- Final Fix
- MAPT
- Step down
- Fly-by
- Fly-over
- Co-located
- Speed limit (?)

Is there any possibility to classify the bare 8.50 fix database 
somehow, i.e. by name ? I can also start to provide other sources, but 
then the fix database needs updates outside xplane. Another question is, 
are current fixes also used for AI Traffic ?

Cheers, Yves

--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel