Re: [Flightgear-devel] Good company on the list; Was: FlightGear on 32 bits versus 64 bits system
From: gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] I agree, don't do that +1 PS. In case anyone wonders why I've only been lurking for a year or so: FGFS stopped building on my develop machine and I've not resolved the issue yet. It seemed like a bad idea to say too much on the list when I'm unable to run FGFS! - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Good company on the list; Was: FlightGear on 32 bits versus 64 bits system
Erik, Erik Hofman wrote: Vivian Meazza wrote: Er ... couple of words spring to mind there - grandmother and eggs :-). But I know that you are trying to help. Alright, I'm just about to lay down activities for FlightGear for the second time (and now for good) because of this statement. Don't do that, these comments are not worth the trouble - nevertheless I understand your motivation. If you plan to step out of the general development cycle (again), do it like others have already done and create your own side-project or be supportive to one of those already existing ones, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Good company on the list; Was: FlightGear on 32 bits versus 64 bits system
On mardi 23 septembre 2008, Martin Spott wrote: Erik, Erik Hofman wrote: Vivian Meazza wrote: Er ... couple of words spring to mind there - grandmother and eggs :-). But I know that you are trying to help. Alright, I'm just about to lay down activities for FlightGear for the second time (and now for good) because of this statement. Don't do that, these comments are not worth the trouble - nevertheless I understand your motivation. If you plan to step out of the general development cycle (again), do it like others have already done and create your own side-project or be supportive to one of those already existing ones, Martin. I agree, don't do that, to me, if there was only one good reason to go on , it is that one: in addition to everything good you did recently on FG, you give us with the last f16 update, and the integration of the last JSBsim version within FG, a new fresh air. Here, one, knows that i am fond of JSBsim FDM and each new JSBsim FDM Aircraft improvement is an enjoyment for me. BTW: And, i regret that, Dave Culp, an other expert (and Pilot) has vanished, for some reasons, from these mail lists. Cheers -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. Voltaire - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
