[fonc] Programming Language Theory Stack Exchange
A proposed stack exchange for programming language theory has reached commitment phase. It needs two hundred people. If you're interested in PL, please participate: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65167?phase=commitment ___ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
Re: [fonc] Programming Language Theory Stack Exchange
David Barbour wrote: A proposed stack exchange for programming language theory has reached commitment phase. It needs two hundred people. If you're interested in PL, please participate: For those not aware of it, the starting point for discussions of programming language theory is http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/ Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. Yogi Berra ___ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
Re: [fonc] Programming Language Theory Stack Exchange
Hehe that's interesting. I'd never associated LTU with modern languages. I'm not sure why. Possibly because of the archaic UX and UI. It's incredibly difficult to parse. J http://www.getcontented.com.au/ - You Need GetContented - Get Your Website Happy. :) On 28 Sep 2014, at 12:37 am, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: David Barbour wrote: A proposed stack exchange for programming language theory has reached commitment phase. It needs two hundred people. If you're interested in PL, please participate: For those not aware of it, the starting point for discussions of programming language theory is http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/ Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. Yogi Berra ___ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc ___ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
Re: [fonc] Programming Language Theory Stack Exchange
How so Julian? Hehe. On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Julian Leviston jul...@leviston.net wrote: Hehe that's interesting. I'd never associated LTU with modern languages. I'm not sure why. Possibly because of the archaic UX and UI. It's incredibly difficult to parse. J http://www.getcontented.com.au/ - You Need *GetContented *- Get Your Website Happy. :) On 28 Sep 2014, at 12:37 am, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: David Barbour wrote: A proposed stack exchange for programming language theory has reached commitment phase. It needs two hundred people. If you're interested in PL, please participate: For those not aware of it, the starting point for discussions of programming language theory is http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/ Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. Yogi Berra ___ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc ___ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc ___ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
