ROFL! Most of the time, for most people, organizations, and businesses,
roll-your-own crypto is totally stupid! But a language for metadescription
of cryptographic algorithms totally makes sense, both as a way of generating
standards compliant implementations, and to address the problem of my
platform doesn't speak C and I need a secure/reliable crypto
implementation.
Cool! Now if we only had the metadescriptions:)
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Monty Zukowski mo...@codetransform.comwrote:
I wanted to bring to your attention Ben Laurie's Stupid: A
Metalanguage For Cryptography. Despite the name it actually is
helpful for abstracting the design of cryptographic algorithms.
http://www.links.org/?p=864
Monty
___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
--
Casey Ransberger
___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
