Re: [Fonts] freetype module sometimes gets font height (descent?) wrong
From: Michael Lampe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fonts] freetype module sometimes gets font height (descent?) wrong
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:39:58 +0100
xlsfonts lists the font in question.
Emacs bluntly says No fonts match ... and aborts.
xfd seems to use it, but displays unknown font in the first line. And
contrary to what I said before you can see the overall problem with xfd
too if you increase the font size.
OK. That patch was broken. I somewhat misunderstood...
I'm still wondering if you are able to reproduce what I'm talking about.
Please try
xedit
-fn -monotype-courier new-medium-r-normal--12-0-100-100-m-0-iso8859-1
Two small images of what it looks like for me are here:
http://cox.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/~lampe/xedit-xtt.png
http://cox.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/~lampe/xedit-freetype.png
I cannot reprodeuce them using xedit... Why? How is your
resolution of xdpyinfo. 100x100 dots per inch?
I attach fontpropdump.c. Would you tell me the results of
freetype and xtt?
usage:
./fontpropdump -monotype-courier new-medium-r-normal--12-0-100-100-m-0-iso8859-1
Here are my results:
[X-TT]
PIXEL_SIZE : 12
POINT_SIZE : 87
RESOLUTION_X : 100
RESOLUTION_Y : 100
AVERAGE_WIDTH : 70
RAW_AVERAGE_WIDTH : 6001
FONT_ASCENT : 11
RAW_ASCENT : (none)
FONT_DESCENT : 4
RAW_DESCENT : (none)
SUBSCRIPT_SIZE : 8
SUBSCRIPT_X : 0
SUBSCRIPT_Y : 2
SUPERSCRIPT_SIZE : 8
SUPERSCRIPT_X : 0
SUPERSCRIPT_Y : 5
UNDERLINE_THICKNESS : 1
UNDERLINE_POSITION : 3
RAW_PIXEL_SIZE : (none)
RAW_POINT_SIZE : (none)
[FreeType]
PIXEL_SIZE : 12
POINT_SIZE : 87
RESOLUTION_X : 100
RESOLUTION_Y : 100
AVERAGE_WIDTH : 70
RAW_AVERAGE_WIDTH : 600
FONT_ASCENT : (none)
RAW_ASCENT : 832
FONT_DESCENT : (none)
RAW_DESCENT : 300
SUBSCRIPT_SIZE : (none)
SUBSCRIPT_X : (none)
SUBSCRIPT_Y : (none)
SUPERSCRIPT_SIZE : (none)
SUPERSCRIPT_X : (none)
SUPERSCRIPT_Y : (none)
UNDERLINE_THICKNESS : (none)
UNDERLINE_POSITION : (none)
RAW_PIXEL_SIZE : 1000
RAW_POINT_SIZE : 723
The resolution of Xserver is 100x100 dots per inch.
Chisato Yamauchi
#include stdio.h
#include X11/Xlib.h
int main( int argc, char *argv[] )
{
Display *dis;
XFontStruct *fs;
Atom atom;
unsigned long val;
char *name;
Bool result;
char *props[] = {
PIXEL_SIZE,
POINT_SIZE,
RESOLUTION_X,
RESOLUTION_Y,
AVERAGE_WIDTH,
RAW_AVERAGE_WIDTH,
FONT_ASCENT,
RAW_ASCENT,
FONT_DESCENT,
RAW_DESCENT,
SUBSCRIPT_SIZE,
SUBSCRIPT_X,
SUBSCRIPT_Y,
SUPERSCRIPT_SIZE,
SUPERSCRIPT_X,
SUPERSCRIPT_Y,
UNDERLINE_THICKNESS,
UNDERLINE_POSITION,
RAW_PIXEL_SIZE,
RAW_POINT_SIZE,
NULL,
};
int i;
if( argc 2 ) return -1;
dis=XOpenDisplay(NULL);
fs = XLoadQueryFont(dis,argv[1]);
if( fs==NULL ) return -1;
i=0;
while ( props[i] != NULL ) {
atom = XInternAtom(dis, props[i], True);
result = XGetFontProperty(fs,atom,val);
if ( result )
printf(%s : %d\n,props[i],val);
else
printf(%s : (none)\n,props[i]);
i++;
}
return 0;
}
Re: [Fonts] freetype module sometimes gets font height (descent?) wrong
From: Chisato Yamauchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Fonts] freetype module sometimes gets font height (descent?) wrong Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:32:28 +0900 (JST) Sorry, [X-TT] s/X-TT/FreeType/ PIXEL_SIZE : 12 POINT_SIZE : 87 RESOLUTION_X : 100 RESOLUTION_Y : 100 AVERAGE_WIDTH : 70 RAW_AVERAGE_WIDTH : 6001 FONT_ASCENT : 11 RAW_ASCENT : (none) FONT_DESCENT : 4 RAW_DESCENT : (none) SUBSCRIPT_SIZE : 8 SUBSCRIPT_X : 0 SUBSCRIPT_Y : 2 SUPERSCRIPT_SIZE : 8 SUPERSCRIPT_X : 0 SUPERSCRIPT_Y : 5 UNDERLINE_THICKNESS : 1 UNDERLINE_POSITION : 3 RAW_PIXEL_SIZE : (none) RAW_POINT_SIZE : (none) [FreeType] s/FreeType/X-TT/ PIXEL_SIZE : 12 POINT_SIZE : 87 RESOLUTION_X : 100 RESOLUTION_Y : 100 AVERAGE_WIDTH : 70 RAW_AVERAGE_WIDTH : 600 FONT_ASCENT : (none) RAW_ASCENT : 832 FONT_DESCENT : (none) RAW_DESCENT : 300 SUBSCRIPT_SIZE : (none) SUBSCRIPT_X : (none) SUBSCRIPT_Y : (none) SUPERSCRIPT_SIZE : (none) SUPERSCRIPT_X : (none) SUPERSCRIPT_Y : (none) UNDERLINE_THICKNESS : (none) UNDERLINE_POSITION : (none) RAW_PIXEL_SIZE : 1000 RAW_POINT_SIZE : 723 Chisato Yamauchi ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
[Fonts] freetype module sometimes gets font height (descent?) wrong
This patch is somehow broken. Fonts prefixed with 'fp=n' are not found afterwards. It's strange... I've applied the patch to 4.3.99.903, and it works fine. xlsfonts lists the font in question. Emacs bluntly says No fonts match ... and aborts. xfd seems to use it, but displays unknown font in the first line. And contrary to what I said before you can see the overall problem with xfd too if you increase the font size. Do you use 4.3.99.903? Would you check FontPath?(via xfs?) Current cvs, FontPath definetly correct and xfs not used. I'm still wondering if you are able to reproduce what I'm talking about. Please try xedit -fn -monotype-courier new-medium-r-normal--12-0-100-100-m-0-iso8859-1 Two small images of what it looks like for me are here: http://cox.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/~lampe/xedit-xtt.png http://cox.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/~lampe/xedit-freetype.png -Michael ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
Re: [Fonts] freetype module sometimes gets font height (descent?) wrong
From: Michael Lampe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Fonts] freetype module sometimes gets font height (descent?) wrong Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:00:25 +0100 Try once with freetype and once with xtt loaded: emacs -fn -monotype-courier new-medium-r-normal--13-0-100-100-m-0-iso8859-1 With freetype it looks like double-spaced. With xtt it's ok. This is with current cvs, 4.3 and probably before. I've tested using cour.ttf(included in WindowsNT), but I cannot reproduce the problem. There are no differences between xtt and freetype with current cvs. What font do you use? Chisato Yamauchi ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
[Fonts] freetype module sometimes gets font height (descent?) wrong
Try once with freetype and once with xtt loaded: emacs -fn -monotype-courier new-medium-r-normal--13-0-100-100-m-0-iso8859-1 With freetype it looks like double-spaced. With xtt it's ok. This is with current cvs, 4.3 and probably before. -Michael ___ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
