DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

2002-05-06 Thread bugzilla 

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

broken basic-link when referencing a following page

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-05-06 16:13 ---
The test case works in 0.20.3.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla 

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

broken basic-link when referencing a following page

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-04-22 11:51 ---
*** Bug 7005 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla 

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

broken basic-link when referencing a following page

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-04-22 11:17 ---
*** Bug 5718 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla 

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

broken basic-link when referencing a following page

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ||aachen.de



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-04-22 10:50 ---
*** Bug 3379 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

2002-04-22 Thread bugzilla 

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

broken basic-link when referencing a following page

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ||rostock.de



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-04-22 10:49 ---
*** Bug 3354 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3007] - broken basic-link when referencing a following page

2002-02-25 Thread bugzilla 

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

broken basic-link when referencing a following page





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-02-25 14:01 ---
The same patch should also be applied in org/apache/fop/fo/flow/Block.java:

if (area.getIDReferences() != null)
{
// area.getIDReferences().createID(id);
area.getIDReferences().createUnvalidatedID(id);
area.getIDReferences().addToIdValidationList(id);
}

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3007] broken basic-link when referencing a following page

2001-09-07 Thread Enrico Schnepel 

It is commited into the current CVS-tree but not in the recent release 0.20.1.

Enrico

> 01:50 --- + Am also experiencing similar difficulties.
> + I see there is a work around supplied but not added to the product. When
> is it + likely that the fix will be applied to the core product?
> Unfortunately I am not + competent enough in OpenSource development
> projects to achieve this myself yet, + otherwise obviously I would do so.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3007] broken basic-link when referencing a following page

2001-09-05 Thread bugzilla 

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3007

*** shadow/3007 Wed Aug  8 14:37:01 2001
--- shadow/3007.tmp.3563Wed Sep  5 01:50:08 2001
***
*** 9,14 
--- 9,15 
  ++
  |  Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
  |  Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
+ |  CC list: Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
  ++
  |  URL:  |
  ++
***
*** 163,165 
--- 164,178 
  than unvalidatedId (the similarity with idValidation may cause confusion).  I 
  couldn't come up with anything better in the 5 minutes I spent thinking about it 
  :>
+ 
+ 
+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-09-05 01:50 ---
+ Am also experiencing similar difficulties.
+ I see there is a work around supplied but not added to the product. When is it 
+ likely that the fix will be applied to the core product? Unfortunately I am not 
+ competent enough in OpenSource development projects to achieve this myself yet, 
+ otherwise obviously I would do so.
+ 
+ Thanks
+ 
+ Luke

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]