Re: FOP DTD attached (updated)
David, If you look at the comments at the top of the DTD, you'll find instructions on how to strip out those elements not implemented in FOP Chuck Paussa - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FOP DTD attached (updated)
Ok, I added "fo:" to " + > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fop4d.dtd.diff Description: Binary data - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FOP DTD attached (updated)
I opened the attached DTD in XML Spy, and the validation failed at: ... To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:05 PM Subject: FOP DTD attached (updated) > DTD lovers > > I've created the attached DTD from the XSL FO W3C documents. I updated the DTD to allow you to exclude those elements that are not handled by > FOP. These are fairly clean documents with some additions like enumerated types for lengths and percentages. The enumerated types do not exclude values not implemenetd in FOP. The DTD should work well with PSGML. Post any comments and I'll include them in the next update. [Even the cranky comments I've gotten so far are useful];-) > > Chuck Paussa > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FOP DTD attached (updated)
DTD lovers I've created the attached DTD from the XSL FO W3C documents. I updated the DTD to allow you to exclude those elements that are not handled by FOP. These are fairly clean documents with some additions like enumerated types for lengths and percentages. The enumerated types do not exclude values not implemenetd in FOP. The DTD should work well with PSGML. Post any comments and I'll include them in the next update. [Even the cranky comments I've gotten so far are useful];-) Chuck Paussa - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: fop dtd attached
Title: RE: fop dtd attached Hi, Chuck Paussa recently posted a FOP.dtd. First: Thank you very much! Second: Is it really a FOP.DTD? I think it's rather a FO.DTD (note the small difference: FOP vs. FO), isn't it? Chuck guessed that people are asking for an FOP.DTD to use it with PSGML. I also asked for an FOP.DTD and my intention was to get a description of currently implemented features of FOP. E.g. in Chuck's DTD, the fo:inline attribute "baseline-shift" is mentions as defined in the FO specification. But this attribute isn't working yet with FOP (I tried a basline-shift="super" as well as baseline-shift="15mm" without any effect, so I suppose it's not implemented yet). Another example is the clip-property. So, baseline-shift has to be removed from FOP.DTD, even if it's present in FO.DTD. Or, another way, add a comment there. It it possible to add these comments or remove not supported features from FOP.DTD. That would make developing FO for FOP much more easier. Regards, Jens
fop dtd attached
A couple of people have written in recently asking for an FOP dtd. I'm guessing so they can use it with PSGML. So, I made one using the standard document as well as I could read it. I tried to include lists of valid values for things like so, if you want to use it as a real validating document, those lists are going to invalidate valid integers. (Replace the list with CDATA and you should be fine) Also, the DTD omits the FO: prefix for the elements. Feel free to fix the problems and repost the DTD. FOP DTD attached Chuck __ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
