DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 Johans Marvin Taboada Villca [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #52 from Johans Marvin Taboada Villca [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-08 14:44:42 PST --- (In reply to comment #50) I've been asked to look into this issue, so I committed a partial and temporary fix based on the latest patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=660979 Footnotes in table headers and footers are not handled yet, and anyway I think it's best to wait for clarification from xsl-editors before implementing anything (which gives us a couple of months ;-) ). First, many thanks to all for your great efforts. As I've seen, fop-0.95beta has been released by 2008-03-25 so these temporally fixes (2008-05-28) are still not present in it. Is there any preliminar release date for beta2 or something like that?. A couple of months?. Should I use trunk? Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45152] Solid bottom border not rendered correctly since 0 .94
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45152 Alfred Nathaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #7 from Alfred Nathaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-08 15:44:09 PST --- Thanks for the hint. border-collapse=separate does indeed restore the 0.93 behaviour and produces the effect I actually need to produce (drawing a solid line with constant thickness between table rows with different col-span cells. I am not a CSS-lawyer that I don't want to judge whether the missing corners starting in 0.94 are to be expected. But I don't think that the 0.95beta behaviour to make the bottom-border width depend on the col-spans of the next row is normal. Furthermore, it depends whether the bordered row is the first one or not. I am attaching another testcase to illustrate that. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45152] Solid bottom border not rendered correctly since 0 .94
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45152 --- Comment #9 from Alfred Nathaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-08 15:49:04 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22097) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22097) PDF output of 0.95beta -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
