Yes, you are right. I'm quite surprised by myself. I will try to fix this the next few days.
But while playing with the rtf code i noticed following behaviour (Word2000 SP3): If i write "\picscalex75 \picscaley75 \picwgoal1500 \pichgoal900" i get an image width of about 2cm in Word2000 (as expected), but when i write "\picscalex100 \picscaley100 \picwgoal1125 \pichgoal675" it's larger. Can anybody explain this? Kind regards, Peter Herweg -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Jeremias Maerki Gesendet: Montag, 12. Dezember 2005 17:51 An: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Betreff: RTF: Size of images incorrect? (Mostly for Peter Herweg, I guess) I tried to implement SVG support for RTF output by converting the SVG images through Batik's JPEGTranscoder to a JPEG. That part was easy and done in 10 minutes. However, I noticed that all images are currently painted much too small in MS Word Viewer 2003 and OpenOffice 2.0. In RTFHandler, the image size is set in points. However, it looks like RtfExternalGraphic just ignores the "pt" at the end of the string. It only looks for percentages. Otherwise, it calculates with twips internally (1 twip = 1/20 pt). IMO, "picscalex" and "picscaley" should always be 100 and picwgoal and pichgoal should be set to the right dimension in twips, i.e. convert to twips already in the RTFHandler to keep the RTF library FOP-independant. Any ideas? Can anybody confirm that I'm not seeing ghosts here? :-) Thanks. Jeremias Maerki
