Re: Creating New org.apache.fop.fo.flow.table Package
On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Guys, this proposal will be based on lazy consensus. I think that table-related FObj descendants are numerous enough to deserve their own package. Moreover, creating a new sub-package will allow for more fine-grained access control of methods. And the flow package is already quite big. +1 Cheers Andreas
Creating New org.apache.fop.fo.flow.table Package
Hi Guys, this proposal will be based on lazy consensus. I think that table-related FObj descendants are numerous enough to deserve their own package. Moreover, creating a new sub-package will allow for more fine-grained access control of methods. And the flow package is already quite big. If you don’t agree, please shout! Thanks, Vincent
Re: Creating New org.apache.fop.fo.flow.table Package
Hi Vincent, You certainly have more knowledge in this area than I, so I'm quite happy to go along with your suggestion :). Adrian. Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Guys, this proposal will be based on lazy consensus. I think that table-related FObj descendants are numerous enough to deserve their own package. Moreover, creating a new sub-package will allow for more fine-grained access control of methods. And the flow package is already quite big. If you don’t agree, please shout! Thanks, Vincent
