Re: JPdfUnit
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 02:34 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > But the underlying PDF library looks quite interesting (PDFBox). Has > anyone had any experiences with it? If yes, we should add it to our > PDF post-processors list on the website, if just because it has a > better license than iText. I am using it in a project which provides on-line searchable PDF files (Government Acts and Regulations) indexed using Lucene and in that context it works fine, that is as a backend activity PDFBox extracts the text components from the PDF for Lucene to index and as an on-line activity once matching documents are found the PDF is searched again using PDFBox to find the search terms in the PDF file so an Acrobat highlight XML file can be constructed. > > Jeremias Maerki Manuel
Re: JPdfUnit
Theoretically, yes, but I currently don't see any real added value compared to layoutengine+visual tests. And after all, someone would have to write them. :-) If we had something like that for RTF it would be preferred. :-) I'd prefer anything to remote controlling Word. But the underlying PDF library looks quite interesting (PDFBox). Has anyone had any experiences with it? If yes, we should add it to our PDF post-processors list on the website, if just because it has a better license than iText. On 19.09.2005 21:52:22 J.Pietschmann wrote: > Hi all, > fresh on freshmeat: > http://freshmeat.net/releases/207188/ > > Can this be used to provide tests for the PDF renderer? > > J.Pietschmann Jeremias Maerki
JPdfUnit
Hi all, fresh on freshmeat: http://freshmeat.net/releases/207188/ Can this be used to provide tests for the PDF renderer? J.Pietschmann