You did the right thing.
From http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq:
> What files in an Apache release do not require a license header?
>
> A file without any degree of creativity in either its literal elements
> or its structure is not protected by copyright law; therefore, such a
> file does not require a license header. If in doubt about the extent of
> the file's creativity, add the license header to the file.
If you ran RAT (http://incubator.apache.org/rat/), such a file without a
license header would light up.
On 20.10.2009 18:34:02 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In doubt, I added them, but is it actually necessary to put license
> headers in such test files? The header is bigger than the actual
> content...
>
> Vincent
>
>
> > Added:
> > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Accessibility/test/accessibility/background-image_jpg_repeat.fo
> > URL:
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Accessibility/test/accessibility/background-image_jpg_repeat.fo?rev=827725&view=auto
> > ==
> > ---
> > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Accessibility/test/accessibility/background-image_jpg_repeat.fo
> > (added)
> > +++
> > xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Accessibility/test/accessibility/background-image_jpg_repeat.fo
> > Tue Oct 20 16:24:44 2009
> > @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> > +
> > +
> > +
> > +http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";>
> > +
> > + > + page-height="220pt" page-width="320pt" margin="10pt">
> > + > background-image="../resources/images/bgimg72dpi.jpg"/>
> > +
> > +
> > +
> > + > text-align="justify">
> > + Apache FOP (Formatting Objects Processor) is a print
> > formatter driven by XSL
> > +formatting objects (XSL-FO) and an output independent formatter.
> > It is a Java application
> > +that reads a formatting object (FO) tree and renders the resulting
> > pages to a specified
> > +output.
> > +
> > +
> > +
Jeremias Maerki
