Re: Possible Bug: No control Over Itemized List Marks
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:07, Christopher R. Maden cr...@maden.org wrote: Tom Browder wrote: 1. Is this a fop bug? ... Your FO markup is almost certainly requesting the symbol you see. FOP does not make up list markers on its own; it uses the requested symbol. Thanks, Chris. The information in the two docbook books led me to believe it was an implementation issue which I assumed was fop. I found the places to fix it--it looks like a DocBook limitation to me. -Tom
Re: Possible Bug: No control Over Itemized List Marks
Hi Tom, Please, ask FOP usage related questions on FOP-User list. That said, your question is not directly related to FOP. To be given a more precise answer, you should indicate/provide: - indicate what XML DTD and/or what XSLT you are using (and ask on the relevant list, either concerning your DTD, or concerning XSLT) - provide the XSL-FO you get *after* XSLT process onto FOP-user list. Pascal Le 29/06/2010 18:26, Tom Browder a écrit : I get a default filled circle (mark='bullet'?) for the listitems in an itemized list for both html and pdf output. When I have a nested list I get a default opencircle (mark='opencircle') for the nested listitems for html output but still get the bullet for pdf output. The fop conformance page says all list handling things are taken care of. I cannot find much help on the mailing list archives except to say a font change may be needed (but no example). I can find nothing in the bug list about this. Questions: 1. Is this a fop bug? 2. Is there a way to work around the problem? If so, please give an explicit example of how to do it (or point to one). Thanks. Regards, -Tom Thomas M. Browder, Jr.
Possible Bug: No control Over Itemized List Marks
I get a default filled circle (mark='bullet'?) for the listitems in an itemized list for both html and pdf output. When I have a nested list I get a default opencircle (mark='opencircle') for the nested listitems for html output but still get the bullet for pdf output. The fop conformance page says all list handling things are taken care of. I cannot find much help on the mailing list archives except to say a font change may be needed (but no example). I can find nothing in the bug list about this. Questions: 1. Is this a fop bug? 2. Is there a way to work around the problem? If so, please give an explicit example of how to do it (or point to one). Thanks. Regards, -Tom Thomas M. Browder, Jr. Niceville, Florida USA
Re: Possible Bug: No control Over Itemized List Marks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom Browder wrote: 1. Is this a fop bug? No. Your FO markup is almost certainly requesting the symbol you see. FOP does not make up list markers on its own; it uses the requested symbol. If you believe otherwise, post a sample of the FO XML that is the input to FOP. I believe you previously mentioned you are using DocBook; the DocBook stylesheets may be using the same list marker at every list level. Follow up to fop-users if necessary, but this is extremely unlikely to be a FOP issue. ~Chris - -- Chris Maden, text nerd URL: http://crism.maden.org/ “I like being free, and that makes me an idiot, I suppose.” — Stan Rogers, “The Idiot” GnuPG Fingerprint: C6E4 E2A9 C9F8 71AC 9724 CAA3 19F8 6677 0077 C319 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkwqKEgACgkQGfhmdwB3wxk9LgCgyq6tSbnTwCzBtbzT8oDeppVA uSEAnA1HuzQK9RoI5y8r0b1HzCxL4X7a =Sl7L -END PGP SIGNATURE-
