RE: table-row borders
Title: fo:table-row borders -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 fo:table-row bordersyup! row-border support isn't implemented. either use the cell-border or the table-border itself... ( dunno for sure, but might have to do with support for cells spanning multiple rows ) greetz ald -Original Message- From: Sander, Stefan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 15 juli 2003 14:34 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: fo:table-row borders Hi, mot sure if this has been asked before: I am trying to set borders on a table row. According to the sample border.fo this should look like this: --snip --snip However, this specific border does not show up in a PDF document generated with 0.20.5rc3a. This has been supported with Verion 0.17.x which I am currently upgrading from. Has the support for row level borders been removed on purpose or am I doing something wrong? Column and cell level borders seem to work fine. Thanks, Stefan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBPxQAS9Bw/OvTa+XUEQKRLQCfSBuTIflVALGD8bE1/FhqWagUv20AnjRd xY/st1JGpjL/EY/iwICJhfKY =FPm/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- PGPexch.htm.asc Description: Binary data - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forms and Editable fields
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Not directly with FOP. Possibly with iText. See http://xml.apache.org/fop/output.html#pdf-postprocess. greetz ald -Original Message- From: Bernard Biron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 14 juli 2003 18:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Forms and Editable fields Hi, I would like to generate PDF that contains editable fields using FOP. I havent saw any XSL:FO commands to do it. Could someone please tell me if it is possible to do it or not? Thanks, Bernard Biron -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBPxL5cNBw/OvTa+XUEQKBqgCeIf6Agkuj21SLFVY/Q6UdjbE5VxkAn0KL oHvAY/tBtbhj3wHYW4xhXZGQ =IcSt -END PGP SIGNATURE- PGPexch.htm.asc Description: Binary data - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exception in thread...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 soundz like a classpath prob to me. sure you're running fop from the fop-dir itself? greetz, ald -Original Message- From: Dennis Grace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 14 juli 2003 21:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exception in thread... Sorry to be a pest, but I can't get into the archives. I'm trying to get FOP 0.20.5rc up and running on RedHat 9.0. I'm running Java 1.4.2. When try to process an FO, I get this error: Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/fop/apps/Fop Can anyone tell me how to parse this? Thanks. Dennis Grace Information Developer IBM Linux Technology Center (512) 838-3937 T/L 678-3937 cell: (512)-296-7830 [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith. J William Fulbright - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPxMHG9Bw/OvTa+XUEQLJwgCdHZIO+u4QY88dS60drbPi+EQcHb0AnR7A t3bGjAwn1KcAn/AKjco7nL5i =yPi+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: using MS Sans Serif inpdf reporting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Correction: 'MS Sans Serif' seems not to be TTF, but FON. Don't know if this can already be embedded... anyone? greetz, ald - -Original Message- From: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zondag 13 juli 2003 10:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: using MS Sans Serif inpdf reporting - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Check out the link below ( MS Sans Serif is TTF ) : http://xml.apache.org/fop/fonts.html#custom Greetz, ald -Original Message- From: Zahidul Islam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zondag 13 juli 2003 6:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: using MS Sans Serif inpdf reporting hello i want to use MS Sans Sherif font in my pdf reporting. pls help me details aboiut that , i mean how it can be done?, is it possible? etc etc.. pls help me. zahid. - - - -- - - Do you Yahoo!? Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). - -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBPxEbFdBw/OvTa+XUEQKrJACfcLV5Y/7ZsqiVH/k+EpSgFLVXRtcAnRPX vnP98GChEodr9WmGL6LLl3ie =8JkK - -END PGP SIGNATURE- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBPxEq2tBw/OvTa+XUEQJRpACfbD2pRGi1l0meQhzboZDJ1Nm9mEkAoLVw 3GiCvGCwn6AtQry36DE2/SCr =PbYh -END PGP SIGNATURE- PGPexch.htm.asc Description: Binary data - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGPexch.htm.asc Description: Binary data - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PDF encryption
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -Original Message- From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 10 juli 2003 19:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PDF encryption Chris Faulkner wrote: Thanks for that - it looks like the PDF decryption can only be done if you have the owner password, although it apparently has tools to apply brute force to crack the password, mentioning dictionary attacks. Seems like if you keep the password long and obscure, it isn't that easy. Does anyone have any direct experience with these tools ? I have used their Excel pw recovery a few times. Since you do not actually 'obtain' the password, but only a working alternative, it's hard to say whether the original passwords' simplicity was the cause of this pretty tool to be able to do the trick in less than a second ( Athlon XP+ 1500 ) ... although very likely. Problem with the standards is that someone always comes up with a possibility of reversing the process somehow - in fact this possibility is already there from the beginning, it's just a matter of optimizing the code to perform the extraction based upon the given hash and algorithm, possessing the knowledge to do so, and, of course, computing power. Fact remains that if some particular piece of information would need to be protected 'at all costs', it would probably also be worth the effort to design an algorithm yourself... ( or as it happens, a combination of the existing algorithms a la carte ) [ That's why I was playing with the idea of adding a PDF-object with a customizable signature ( - as a binary content stream? ) on top of the existing standard, but problem is that you would also need to draw heavily on the Acrobat SDK to ensure that you have a way of editing / saving the PDF without that supplemental sig being removed as an 'unused' object. - thx for pointing that out, jerry ;-) saved me hours of work ... ] Guess it all comes down to relying upon the standard Acrobat encryption to be enough to 'scare off' most people that might be interested in what the file contains, but if they really persist and possess the required skills and tools, they will eventually get to it anyway. Keeping the pw long obscure will make a difference of minutes, maybe only seconds... No direct experience, but I don't think elcomsoft uses brute force but rather a design flaw, which isn't fixed even in the most recent PDF spec. That's why they can crack 128bit encrypted PDF. A long and obscure password, preferably containing unusual characters, helps only against dictionary attacks. The password isn't used directly but a 40bit respective 128bit hash of it instead. Brute force works nicely against 40bit encryption, regardless of the original password. It wont recover the original password though. Me neither for the PDF pw 'recovery', but their tool for MSOffice / Excel does indeed not actually 'recover' the pw. It simply offers you a string that does the trick. J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPw3MP9Bw/OvTa+XUEQLS1gCfdUfHTCq3s/p8cDatcZCjOx5rRg8AnjXn yFTlX4RwrJUjLD/Lac7dQdDI =svlL -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why no .fo needed to run fop?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 it is not... an intermediate .fo is indeed generated ( if the .xsl & .xml together make up a well-formed xsl:fo document ). greetz ald -Original Message- From: Daniel Maher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zondag 29 juni 2003 20:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Why no .fo needed to run fop? Uh, thanks. My question, however, is why you can run fop without an fo, and in that case, what 'do it do'? Bonnie Yelverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Dan, Please, read a little more on the FOP site. You use XSLT with XML to create a .fo file, in the same way you use it to crate an xml file. Then that file is converted to pdf with wop. Quite simple. Bonnie -Original Message- From: Daniel Maher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 5:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why no .fo needed to run fop? Hi all, I have a simple conceptual question...why are you able to run fop with just an XSL stylesheet and the input XML doc? 1. Is an fo created implicitly? 2. what's the format of this fo? From the examples: fop -xsl foo.xsl -xml foo.xml -pdf foo.pdf Thanks, Dan Maher -Dan I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize. http://www.northernfern.com/Anna/ NEW! http://www.freeroller.net/page/toastchee/Weblog - -- - -- Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! -Dan I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize. http://www.northernfern.com/Anna/ NEW! http://www.freeroller.net/page/toastchee/Weblog - -- - Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBPv9YWdBw/OvTa+XUEQKwPwCfTxoTQlwt7TcgfkUW5kQnJ9PSQucAoNf9 6WOsPnI7NLwQSPR+jc5GaHed =+1k+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- PGPexch.htm.asc Description: Binary data - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NoClassDefFoundError
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 sounds like a classpath problem to me... u must make sure the fop.jar file is accessible at runtime. ( try adding PATH=%PATH%;C:\fop-0.20.5rc\build\fop.jar - or wherever this file is located - to the batch file ). greetz, ald - -Original Message- From: John Zacharias Theophanous [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 26 juni 2003 16:47 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NoClassDefFoundError Importance: High Hi All, I am new to FOP and I have tried to run FOP using the following command from the command prompt: C:\C:\fop-0.20.5rc\fop.bat -fo a:\simple.fo -pdf a:\simple.pdf And I get the following error: Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/fop/apps/Fop Any advice would be appreciated. Regards, John Theophanous. * J. Z. Theophanous, Department of Information Science, School of Information Technology, Faculty of Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa. Telephone Number: + 27 (0) 12 420 4026 Facsimile: + 27 (0) 12 362 5181 Web: http://is.up.ac.za/ War does not determine who is right - only who is left. (Bertrand Russell) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPvscl9Bw/OvTa+XUEQIJKACfX1qnbh73ktvRi3bIGU12lfdgahQAoIMR k3f2Ba8c+beIxuW9PLnj5113 =eY4P -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with line breaks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 i'm speaking from neither, but the desired result seems a little awkward (?) better-formed : fo:blockPErf./fo:blockfo:block2003/fo:block etc. or fo:blockPErf.#160;2003#160;2002#160;2000/fo:block ( optional : defining entity for #160; to make it more readable ) cheerz, ald - -Original Message- From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 26 juni 2003 18:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with line breaks Whoops! That should've been... (I'm speaking from experience, and *NOT* the perspective of intimate knowledge of the XSL-FO spec). hehehe... my bad! On 6/26/2003 9:27 AM, Clay Leeds wrote: Sebastien, On 6/26/2003 7:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know that, the xsl fo equivalent of br is fo:block/ Actually, I believe the equivalent of br is fo:block#160;/fo:block because the fo:block element requires content (I'm speaking from experience, and the perspective of intimate knowledge of the XSL-FO spec). HTH! - -- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPvsu2tBw/OvTa+XUEQJmZQCgyKJt8+feKeOcv1mWKfWIfARBn9wAoNec XsxJb7QPEM0Lpx2Ybyj+oZsK =2vFr -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with line breaks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 fo:blockPErf.#160;2003#160;2002#160;2000/fo:block ( optional : defining entity for #160; to make it more readable ) This example probably won't help much, since #160; equates to a non-breaking space (nbsp;) which would force all of the elements on one line. I use it in my example wrapped with fo:block /fo:block tags causing the linefeed. then maybe the good-old #013; would be better suited? cheerz, ald -- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPvsyU9Bw/OvTa+XUEQJvqACg4JaT3hvio5UwV0KezbwJ1y2jsHsAn3fI NIws9lzr/FhDII6nKpD+KHWB =9PQx -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: background-image to cover entire page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 dunno exactly, but i think this might do the trick : - - set margin-top margin-bottom to 0 - - define region-before with extent equal to page-height - - define region-body with the desired measures for the actual document - - define static-content with region=before - - in there, use external-graphic to add your image [ only downside is that if u use region-before, u can't use it for headers; if u need both headers footers ... ? ] haven't tried it myself though, let us know if this works greetz, ald - -Original Message- From: Jeroen van Holst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 26 juni 2003 15:37 To: fop-user Subject: background-image to cover entire page Hi, Is it possible to have a page-sized background image (0 margins, covering the *entire* page) and overlay this with the actual document rendered with proper margins? Thanks, Jeroen - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPvsz7tBw/OvTa+XUEQL0jQCdH3sfP1EGMGkrm3mthKkJJtpT0IIAoMDe B7lqAouLKIQnG4F6a3mkNPCg =BZCt -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spurious space between table-header and table header.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 my guess is this has sth to do with inheritance top or bottom? both get doubled by them being defined in table-header table-row ( last one implicitly ? ) would try adding them to the row instead leaving them out of the table-header ( unless i really needed a header with multiple rows ) greetz ald -Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 26 juni 2003 20:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Spurious space between table-header and table header. Hmm, looks like a bug. I'm sure Jörg knows all about it and I didn't pay attention again. :-) Funny thing is that the gap between table-header and table-body is exactly the width of the border-top-width. Change that value and you change the gap. Work-around: - Remove the border-top-* on the table-header - Add these border-top attributes to table instead. I hope this helps. On 26.06.2003 17:03:02 jaccoud wrote: Try processing the attached fo. Although there is no specification of space between the header and body, somehow a ~1.25mm gap crawls its way in. (See attached file: header-body.fo) Or maybe I am missing something. I do that a lot :-/ Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA+AwUBPvs/UdBw/OvTa+XUEQK2yQCgqnMDiPOPz/n3rByMkZUXy+4oM1AAl18p BB7BtB+JKh/ISf15B79W8Us= =imTf -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Page Setup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 set up a *-page-master with the appropriate width x height ?? good luck ald -Original Message- From: amar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 26 juni 2003 20:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Page Setup Hello guys how do i set up the page in pdf as landscape. thanks -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBPvtCs9Bw/OvTa+XUEQIu0wCgu6ShQsz0ewjtMp8kUKBIUDTiGzoAnA0u ayP1qZqZJt3u116oKDaxud/z =G9Rj -END PGP SIGNATURE- PGPexch.htm.asc Description: Binary data - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Newbie tarred and feathered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tar is actually a gzip format ( i see this has already been answered ... ) i would have recommended using WinRAR, which seems to have no probz with doubled .tar-extension. cheerz, ald -Original Message- From: David Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 26 juni 2003 20:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Newbie tarred and feathered I realize this is hardly a FOP problem, but opening the gift-wrapping has this newbie stymied. I found the following message and reply in the archive, which describes my problem exactly, but no particular solution is offered. Can someone enlighten me? Problem: I downloaded the latest FOP binary download (fop-0.20.5rc3a-bin.tar.tar) from the distribution site http://xml.apache.org/fop/download.htm. I dunno what a tar file is, but WinZip seems to think it can handle it, so I gather its a compressed distribution format. Winzip returns the error message Error reading header after processing 0 entries. Same result with Winzip current 8.5 release and also their beta 9.0. So how does one untar a tar? Is there a preferred tool? Or is the file damaged? David Hill, Camberley Systems, Needham MA Reply by J.Pietschmann Sounds like your untar utility is confused. I remember that *very* old tars have incompatiblities with more modern tars, in particular GNU tar, which may result in this error message. Another possiblity is that it either missed uncompressing, or that uncompressing failed and the error message was dropped somehow. In either case, you can try with another toolset, or at least identify the toolset you are using. ---original message--- Subject: Re: Newbie question about FOP Date: 2003-04-29 20:24:30 Pabolu, Adinarayana (MED, GEMS-IT) wrote: I downloaded FOP( http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop/fop-0.20.5rc2-bin.tar.gz from http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop/. It is giving error Error reading header after processing 0 entries. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPvtDXtBw/OvTa+XUEQIhwgCg27jxxeoTHIDt852M89IqZoNB4OsAnjzZ H6GnGAy9KnL58xYXgLKWgimE =qnNr -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Embedding FOP, PDF Encryption Custom fonts
i get the picture... thx for the info. ( esp. for pointing out that a different editor might drop this object; sth i hadn't really considered ) btw : switched to the latest version of the 'maintain' branch, but the way the custom config xml is processed seems to differ from the latest distribution version. any helpful hints on this one? thx in advance. greetz, ald -Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 23 juni 2003 11:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Embedding FOP, PDF Encryption Custom fonts What kind of signature/verification? A cryptographic signature inside the PDF to authenticate the generator of the PDF? This is already standardized by Adobe. PDF is designed to be extensible. Therefore it is perfectly valid to add custom streams/objects to the PDF. But you must be prepared that a PDF editor may drop the object if it saves the PDF again. And of course, you need to provide a way to support your proprietary extension. Better stick to standards. On 22.06.2003 12:26:04 Andreas Delmelle wrote: also, i'm considering the option of creating an additional content-stream, that could contain a signature for verification. is it possible to include an object in the pdf that would be left alone by other readers ( but could be used, perhaps as a form of FOP-specific verification ) and does this even make sense? Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Embedding FOP, PDF Encryption Custom fonts
damn'! got me again ;) dl'ed the wrong branch (still got to get used to the cvs tool... sigh) thx for another helpful hint greetz, ald -Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 23 juni 2003 20:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Embedding FOP, PDF Encryption Custom fonts That hasn't changed as far as I know. Are you sure you got the maintenance branch and not the redesign/trunk/HEAD? On 23.06.2003 19:26:11 Andreas Delmelle wrote: btw : switched to the latest version of the 'maintain' branch, but the way the custom config xml is processed seems to differ from the latest distribution version. any helpful hints on this one? Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Embedding FOP, PDF Encryption Custom fonts
If u don't use custom fonts, code like in my earlier message should do the trick. ( Create an options Hashmap use driver.getRenderer().setOptions(...) ). Only downside for the moment is that the producer info will get scrambled, but as this is a mere detail... The supplied restrictions are fully correctly applied though. greetz, ald -Original Message- From: Chris Faulkner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zondag 22 juni 2003 11:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Embedding FOP, PDF Encryption Custom fonts Hello all I am already using FOP to create PDF documents in a servlet environment. I would like to encrypt these documents. I can see on the website that there are instructions to create encrypted documents using the command line tool - how can I use the utilities in a servlet ? Thanks Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Embedding FOP, PDF Encryption Custom fonts
's allright. no hurry. another side-effect : on pressing the OK button in the doc properties summary screen, you get the message that 'this operation is not allowed' ( maybe caused by the fact that this screen is a restricted version of the one in the full Acrobat Version issues a command on pressing that button which is not allowed under the applied restrictions? ) also, i'm considering the option of creating an additional content-stream, that could contain a signature for verification. is it possible to include an object in the pdf that would be left alone by other readers ( but could be used, perhaps as a form of FOP-specific verification ) and does this even make sense? greetz, ald -Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zondag 22 juni 2003 9:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Embedding FOP, PDF Encryption Custom fonts On 21.06.2003 12:45:06 Andreas Delmelle wrote: while embedding FOP using embedded TrueType implementing PDF encryption, stumbled upon the following (Acrobat Reader 5.1) : - - unable to extract embedded font ... That's the missing ToUnicode functionality that was discussed a few days ago. It looks like this is becoming a major topic. - - also the producer ( author / title / date - added myself) properties in the PDFInfo produce weird results snip/ anyone encounter this problem yet? Known problem. Encryption in the maintenance branch is not completely finished. Dictionary strings don't get encrypted like they should. This is fixed in the redesign, however. But that won't help you right now. Either someone has to complete the encryption part or we have to switch the the PDF library from the redesign. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Embedding FOP, PDF Encryption Custom fonts
switched to latest dev cvs snapshot. trouble now is i don't have the apache.commons package. ( imported in AbstracPDFStream.java ) anyone know where to get it? thx, ald -Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: zondag 22 juni 2003 9:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Embedding FOP, PDF Encryption Custom fonts On 21.06.2003 12:45:06 Andreas Delmelle wrote: while embedding FOP using embedded TrueType implementing PDF encryption, stumbled upon the following (Acrobat Reader 5.1) : - - unable to extract embedded font ... That's the missing ToUnicode functionality that was discussed a few days ago. It looks like this is becoming a major topic. - - also the producer ( author / title / date - added myself) properties in the PDFInfo produce weird results snip/ anyone encounter this problem yet? Known problem. Encryption in the maintenance branch is not completely finished. Dictionary strings don't get encrypted like they should. This is fixed in the redesign, however. But that won't help you right now. Either someone has to complete the encryption part or we have to switch the the PDF library from the redesign. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Embedding FOP, PDF Encryption Custom fonts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 while embedding FOP using embedded TrueType implementing PDF encryption, stumbled upon the following (Acrobat Reader 5.1) : - - unable to extract embedded font ... - - also the producer ( author / title / date - added myself) properties in the PDFInfo produce weird results code : driver.setRenderer(Driver.RENDER_PDF); log.info( Renderer set... ); driver.getRenderer().setAuthor( author ); driver.getRenderer().setTitle( title ); opt = new java.util.HashMap(); opt.put( allowEditContent, FALSE ); opt.put( allowPrint, FALSE ); log.info( Options created... ); driver.getRenderer().setOptions(opt); anyone encounter this problem yet? greetz ald -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPvQ3J9Bw/OvTa+XUEQIzMwCeNTL8S61/nij4s254OFf/OeaFAEgAnikH mj+rkkPb1j95uQQtxHjaJ7T2 =TNu7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
