RE: Newbie tarred and feathered

2003-06-26 Thread Jamie Stillman
Rename the file to *.tar.gz as opposed to *.tar.tar and then winzip will
able to guide you on your way to extracting the actual archive.

-Original Message-
From: David Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Newbie tarred and feathered


I realize this is hardly a FOP problem, but opening the gift-wrapping has
this newbie
stymied. I found the following message and reply in the archive, which
describes my
problem exactly, but no particular solution is offered.  Can someone
enlighten me?

Problem: I downloaded the latest FOP binary download
(fop-0.20.5rc3a-bin.tar.tar) from the
distribution site http://xml.apache.org/fop/download.htm. I dunno what a tar
file is, but
WinZip seems to think it can handle it, so I gather its a compressed
distribution format.
Winzip returns the error message Error reading header after processing 0
entries.  Same
result with Winzip current 8.5 release and also their beta 9.0.

So how does one untar a tar?  Is there a preferred tool?  Or is the file
damaged?

David Hill, Camberley Systems, Needham MA


Reply by  J.Pietschmann
 Sounds like your untar utility is confused. I remember that *very*
 old tars have incompatiblities with more modern tars, in particular
 GNU tar, which may result in this error message. Another possiblity
 is that it either missed uncompressing, or that uncompressing failed
 and the error message was dropped somehow.
 In either case, you can try with another toolset, or at least identify
 the toolset you are using.

---original message---
 Subject:  Re: Newbie question about FOP
 Date: 2003-04-29 20:24:30
 Pabolu, Adinarayana (MED, GEMS-IT) wrote:
I downloaded FOP( http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop/fop-0.20.5rc2-bin.tar.gz
from
http://xml.apache.org/dist/fop/. It is giving error  Error reading header
after
processing 0 entries.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Wrapping string (without spaces)...

2003-06-05 Thread Jamie Stillman
You can also use fo:block hyphenate=true language=en  area that
requires automatic wrapping /fo:block.  Choose the language of your choice
as specified by RFC3066.

- Jamie

-Original Message-
From: Roland Neilands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Wrapping string (without spaces)...


 How can i wrap a string(which has no spaces) inside a cell.
 Example, if i have string SanFrancisco. But the cell accommodate
 only 5 letter width. Then it has to wrap the word as 
 
 SanFr
 ancisco

Inserting zero width spaces at the right spot will trigger wrapping.
Search the archives of FOP user  XSL lists for zero width space, it's a
FAQ.
http://xml.apache.org/fop/maillist.html

Cheers,
Roland


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



PrintStarter.PrintRenderer printing issues with Unix

2003-06-02 Thread Jamie Stillman
Has anyone had issues with using the code from PrintStarter.PrintRenderer
when running on Solaris (or any *nix platform)?  I've taken the code from
that class and have modified it to use the JDK 1.4 Print Services API and
the resulting application works well on Windows, providing the ability to
print dynamically generated PDFs to a printer that is determined at runtime.
However, the same application on Solaris causes printer errors and seems to
hang.

I don't believe the problem lies with FOP, as the code works on Win32
platforms.  More likely, the AWT print subsystem is blame.  However, I
thought that maybe someone might have run into this problem using FOP in the
past and may have some advice on how to troubleshoot it.

One last thing, as our Solaris boxes do not have default printers, I haven't
been able to test using the non-Print Services approach of printing straight
to the default printer (thus eliminating the Print Services API as the
culprit).  However, I expect that, since the approach is the same (and the
code mostly identical), that would also fail.

Thanks,
-
Jamie Stillman
CBC Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
614.538.6076
-



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]