Re: NPE in AbstractRenderer and bug with fo:inlines (was: SVG)

2003-02-11 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Ok, the stacktrace is still missing, but I've still been able to
reproduce the problem. But it's not related to SVG as you suspected. FOP
wants to write a warning message and encounters a null pointer. I've
just committed a change to CVS that fixes the NullPointerException, but
not the bug (see below). If you download the CVS version of FOP you
should be able to generate a PDF from your FO file. The problem is that
on my machine FOP swallowed a character (().

Does anybody have an idea about the following message generated in
AbstractRenderer.java? I've found a reference to this problem in the
mailing list archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10190325361r=1w=2

[ERROR] Areas pending, text probably lost. Check Page unknown and following 
page.

Sounds like you tripped over an old bug. I suggest you try working
around it for the moment by chaning the fo:inline near In Europe there
I was able to get rid of the error by removing the ( before the fo:inline.

Anybody out there who wants to fix that one?

On 11.02.2003 14:30:07 H. krishna wrote:
 Yes, i am using batik version with fop. 
 
 i attached my fo file. please look into this.


Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: NPE in AbstractRenderer and bug with fo:inlines (was: SVG)

2003-02-11 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Looks like it's already in Bugzilla:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13464


Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: NPE in AbstractRenderer and bug with fo:inlines (was: SVG)

2003-02-11 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
[ERROR] Areas pending, text probably lost. Check Page unknown and following page.
...
Anybody out there who wants to fix that one?
The problem is: how? A table can have a bunch of pending areas
in each of the last lines in each cell. What's missing is a link
between the block areas generated by a fo:block across a page
break, but I'm sure this would really screw page gc.
Wait: the block FO could transfer the pending areas from one line
to the next. I'll look into this this week.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]