Re: [foreman-users] [Katello] Attaching subscriptions/products no longer adds yum repo

2016-07-18 Thread Peter Kirby 
Yes.  I have even tried adding the subscription via the UI.  No change to
redhat.repo.

Peter Kirby / Infrastructure and Build Engineer
Magento Certified Developer Plus

peter.ki...@objectstream.com
*Objectstream, Inc. *
Office: 405-942-4477 / Fax: 866-814-0174
7725 W Reno Avenue, Suite 307 Oklahoma City, OK 73127
http://www.objectstream.com/

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Eric D Helms 
wrote:

> Does the host show as having that subscription in the UI?
>
> On Jul 18, 2016 11:23 AM, "Peter Kirby" 
> wrote:
>
>> I'm facing an issue where when I attach a subscription via
>> "subscription-manger attach --pool xxx" is successfully
>> attaches the subscription, but redhat.repo is not longer updated to include
>> the new repo data.
>>
>> This has happened before and I ended up just wiping the entire foreman
>> server and rebuilding it fresh.  Everything worked fine after that, but now
>> the problem has returned.  I can't just rebuild everything every few weeks.
>>
>> I've checked all the log files I could find including
>> /var/log/rhsm/rhsm.log and I cannot find any errors.
>>
>> I've tried deleting the rhsm cache and running subscription-manager
>> refresh, but nothing changes redhat.repo anymore.
>>
>> Has anyone run into this before or have any suggestions for things to try?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Peter
>>
>> 
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Foreman users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Foreman users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [foreman-users] [Katello] Attaching subscriptions/products no longer adds yum repo

2016-07-18 Thread Eric D Helms 
Does the host show as having that subscription in the UI?

On Jul 18, 2016 11:23 AM, "Peter Kirby" 
wrote:

> I'm facing an issue where when I attach a subscription via
> "subscription-manger attach --pool xxx" is successfully
> attaches the subscription, but redhat.repo is not longer updated to include
> the new repo data.
>
> This has happened before and I ended up just wiping the entire foreman
> server and rebuilding it fresh.  Everything worked fine after that, but now
> the problem has returned.  I can't just rebuild everything every few weeks.
>
> I've checked all the log files I could find including
> /var/log/rhsm/rhsm.log and I cannot find any errors.
>
> I've tried deleting the rhsm cache and running subscription-manager
> refresh, but nothing changes redhat.repo anymore.
>
> Has anyone run into this before or have any suggestions for things to try?
>
> Thank you,
> Peter
>
> 
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Foreman users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Katello 3.1 RC1 Released

2016-07-18 Thread Eric D Helms 
Today, Katello only supports el6 and el7 installations but with a variety
of clients.

On Jul 18, 2016 9:19 AM, "Duncan Innes"  wrote:

> Sorry - for installation.
>
> Was just taking the Foreman installation OS options as examples here.
>
> Ideally I'd run Katello on a CentOS7 guest, but the host OS will be Fedora
> 24 for which I'll be trying to get libvirt smart-proxy working.
>
> D
>
> On Monday, 18 July 2016 14:09:13 UTC+1, Eric Helms wrote:
>>
>> For installation purposes or client support?
>>
>> On Jul 18, 2016 8:10 AM, "Duncan Innes"  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is Katello 3.1 not going to support the same OS platforms as Foreman
>>> 1.12 is doing?
>>>
>>> i.e. Fedora 24 for my purpose, but others may look to Debian & Ubuntu
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Duncan
>>>
>>> On Monday, 11 July 2016 13:52:50 UTC+1, jsherril wrote:


 We are happy to announce the first release candidate for Katello 3.1
 (California Common).

 Your help is appreciated to ensure our GA release is solid, by either
 installing a new instance or upgrading a test server.

 A list of the changes in Katello 3.1 is in our release notes:
 http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/release_notes/release_notes.html


 Installation or Upgrade
 ===

 For installation, please see the instructions at:

   Server:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/installation/index.html
   Capsule:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/installation/capsule.html

 For those testing upgrades, please use the instructions below and file
 any issues you encounter. Please note that there are separate upgrade
 instructions for the Katello server and Capsules:

   Server:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/upgrade/index.html
   Capsule:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/upgrade/capsule.html



 Bug reporting
 =
 If you come across a bug in your testing, please file it and note the
 version of Katello that you're using in the report and set the release
 to 3.1.0.

   http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/katello/issues/new

 --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Foreman users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to foreman-user...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to forema...@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Foreman users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[foreman-users] waik_provision_Unattend for Win 7, Win 8.1 Pro, Win 10

2016-07-18 Thread Vishal Sarin 
Hi Foreman Users,

I downloaded winimaging from this URL 
https://github.com/kireevco/foreman-wimaging/tree/1bd8f0facff80c19a5eccc12c01e8febd00f701e/wimaging

How ever this does not have waik_provision_windows for Win 7,81.Pro,Win 10. 

If any of you have these XML files handy or can point me where I can 
download that will be very helpful.

As a workaround I have used XML which I get while restoring Image via 
Clonezilla.

Here is a snippet of same. 




http://schemas.microsoft.com/WMIConfig/2002/State; 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;>
QA-PC
26WNB-G4XP6-QT24H-8RP9V-CYRX3
qa



http://schemas.microsoft.com/WMIConfig/2002/State; 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;>

true
true
true
true
true
Work
3
true
true


http://schemas.microsoft.com/WMIConfig/2002/State; 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;>
en-US
en-US
en-US
en-US






This XML when I am passing to DISM while executing this command.

dism.exe /Image:C:\ /Apply-Unattend:c:\Windows\Panther\unattend.xml 
/ScratchDir:C:\MININT\Scratch/

It gives an error 0xc135 

However the image boots, if you have XML working for Win 7, Win 8.1 Pro, 
Win 10.

Thanks
-Vishal Sarin  


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[foreman-users] Re: Foreman-installer overwrite customized ports.conf (/etc/httpd/conf/ports.conf)

2016-07-18 Thread Andy Ryan 
Foreman-installer overwrote my customized httpd config files without 
warning.  If foreman-installer is going to overwrite files and directories 
like the httpd conf files it should at least create backups of them.

On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 8:37:18 PM UTC-5, Thomas Cheng wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 6:33:34 PM UTC-7, Thomas Cheng wrote:
>>
>> Hi, 
>>  
>>   Foreman-installer overwrites my customized ports.conf every time, I'm 
>> wondering whether there are some options for this issue. Let's elaborate it:
>>
>>  On a Foreman server, I have two network interfaces: outside interface 
>> NIC1 and internal interface NIC2.
>>
>> Ports 80/443 and 8140 are listened on both NICs, but by different 
>> applications and for different purposes: 
>>
>>  Internal interface NIC2:  80/443/8140 are used by Foreman cluster, and 
>> be taken care of by foreman-installer (apache)
>> Outside interface NIC1:  80/443/8140 are used by haproxy and linked for 
>> other purposes.
>>
>> so, when things runs normal, I have the following contents inside  
>> /etc/httpd/conf/ports.conf
>> Listen NIC1:80
>> NameVirtualHost *:80
>> Listen NIC1:443
>> NameVirtualHost *:443
>> Listen NIC1:8140
>> NameVirtualHost *:8140
>>
>> But after every Foreman-installer runs, say, upgrade, or tuning a few 
>> parameters, the file is reset back to the following:
>>
>> Listen 80
>> NameVirtualHost *:80
>> Listen 443
>> NameVirtualHost *:443
>> Listen 8140
>> NameVirtualHost *:8140
>>
>> Then surely the 'foreman-run' will fail in the middle, due to 
>> httpd/apache can not startup, because NIC2:80|443|8140 are already occupied 
>> (by haproxy).
>>
>> is there an option like '--foreman-bind-host', similar to 
>> '--foreman-proxy-bind-host' that is available? I'm running Foreman 1.11.3. 
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Sorry, misplaced NIC1/NIC2 at a few places, Here is the correction:
>
>  Internal interface NIC1:  80/443/8140 are used by Foreman cluster, and be 
> taken care of by foreman-installer (apache)
> Outside interface NIC2:  80/443/8140 are used by haproxy and linked for 
> other purposes. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[foreman-users] Re: Foreman with separate puppet in HA

2016-07-18 Thread Christopher Pisano 
You can have 2 CA servers behind a load balancer if you make them active 
passive and set up shared storage for all the certs. . . or some type of 
replication. If you do not want two CA servers you still should move your 
CA off of your Puppet master if you plan on load balancing your Puppet 
masters and have them talk to Foreman. I am not sure what you mean by can't 
put 1 puppet in 2 foreman simultaneously. 

Have you read the Foreman blog post on HA or watched the case study? I'll 
put the link below just in case.

https://theforeman.org/2015/12/journey_to_high_availability.html

On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 2:57:49 PM UTC-4, Kelvyn Tomaz wrote:
>
> Sorry if i don't explain very well, has a long time without speaking or 
> writing in english
>
> But if i put 2 CA in my infrastructure, my clients has to generate certs 
> in 2 CA?
>
> My goal is just replicate my infrastructure, and i stuck in 2 questions:
>
> - I cannot put 1 puppet in 2 foreman simultaneously
> - I cannot have 2 CA for one virtual IP (In Load Balancer).
>
> And i don't know to resolve this
>
> Tks to reply Christopher!
>
> Em segunda-feira, 18 de julho de 2016 13:49:13 UTC-3, Christopher Pisano 
> escreveu:
>>
>> If I am understanding this correctly you also need to load balance the 
>> foreman smart-proxy on each of the puppet masters. But in your current 
>> architecture I think that poses a risk of CA requests going to a non-CA 
>> puppet master. My suggestion is to always run a completely separate CA from 
>> your masters.
>>
>>
>> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 10:01:17 AM UTC-4, Kelvyn Tomaz wrote:
>>>
>>> HI,
>>>
>>> I'm Kelvyn and i implementing puppet in my office, but my foreman server 
>>> today not supporting all of my puppet nodes (in total 26 nodes) because 
>>> this machine is very old and slow.
>>>
>>> And i like to migrate to a strong infrastructure to supporting +500 
>>> nodes, and i like to put in HA
>>>
>>>
>>> The infrastructure purpose is that
>>>
>>>
>>>[Load Balancer]
>>> /  \
>>>/\
>>>   /  \
>>>  /\
>>> [Puppetmaster and CA][Puppetmaster]
>>> |  \   /| 
>>> |  \/   |
>>> |  \ /  |   
>>> [Foreman]  [Foreman]
>>> \  /
>>>\/
>>>   \   /
>>>   [Postgresql]
>>>
>>>
>>> But my problem is, the 2 machines with puppet will not connected to 2 
>>> foreman machines with foreman-proxy
>>>
>>> How i change this to a complete HA?
>>>
>>> PS: the Postgresql is in a master-slave machine.
>>>
>>>
>>> Tks!
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[foreman-users] Re: Foreman with separate puppet in HA

2016-07-18 Thread Kelvyn Tomaz 
Sorry if i don't explain very well, has a long time without speaking or 
writing in english

But if i put 2 CA in my infrastructure, my clients has to generate certs in 
2 CA?

My goal is just replicate my infrastructure, and i stuck in 2 questions:

- I cannot put 1 puppet in 2 foreman simultaneously
- I cannot have 2 CA for one virtual IP (In Load Balancer).

And i don't know to resolve this

Tks to reply Christopher!

Em segunda-feira, 18 de julho de 2016 13:49:13 UTC-3, Christopher Pisano 
escreveu:
>
> If I am understanding this correctly you also need to load balance the 
> foreman smart-proxy on each of the puppet masters. But in your current 
> architecture I think that poses a risk of CA requests going to a non-CA 
> puppet master. My suggestion is to always run a completely separate CA from 
> your masters.
>
>
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 10:01:17 AM UTC-4, Kelvyn Tomaz wrote:
>>
>> HI,
>>
>> I'm Kelvyn and i implementing puppet in my office, but my foreman server 
>> today not supporting all of my puppet nodes (in total 26 nodes) because 
>> this machine is very old and slow.
>>
>> And i like to migrate to a strong infrastructure to supporting +500 
>> nodes, and i like to put in HA
>>
>>
>> The infrastructure purpose is that
>>
>>
>>[Load Balancer]
>> /  \
>>/\
>>   /  \
>>  /\
>> [Puppetmaster and CA][Puppetmaster]
>> |  \   /| 
>> |  \/   |
>> |  \ /  |   
>> [Foreman]  [Foreman]
>> \  /
>>\/
>>   \   /
>>   [Postgresql]
>>
>>
>> But my problem is, the 2 machines with puppet will not connected to 2 
>> foreman machines with foreman-proxy
>>
>> How i change this to a complete HA?
>>
>> PS: the Postgresql is in a master-slave machine.
>>
>>
>> Tks!
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[foreman-users] Main Katello server pointing at itself for updates?

2016-07-18 Thread Dylan Baars 
Hi all,

has anyone pointed your main katello server at katello for updates? I.e. 
added the "Required repositories" for katello from 
http://www.katello.org/docs/3.0/installation/index.html by adding 
Products/repositories, then subscribing the system and removing all 
/etc/yum.repos.d/* repositories and have them come via the redhat.repo 
file? Is it even a good idea?

Equally, for capsules is that possible/a good idea?

Thanks :-)
Dylan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[foreman-users] Re: Foreman with separate puppet in HA

2016-07-18 Thread Christopher Pisano 
If I am understanding this correctly you also need to load balance the 
foreman smart-proxy on each of the puppet masters. But in your current 
architecture I think that poses a risk of CA requests going to a non-CA 
puppet master. My suggestion is to always run a completely separate CA from 
your masters.


On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 10:01:17 AM UTC-4, Kelvyn Tomaz wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> I'm Kelvyn and i implementing puppet in my office, but my foreman server 
> today not supporting all of my puppet nodes (in total 26 nodes) because 
> this machine is very old and slow.
>
> And i like to migrate to a strong infrastructure to supporting +500 nodes, 
> and i like to put in HA
>
>
> The infrastructure purpose is that
>
>
>[Load Balancer]
> /  \
>/\
>   /  \
>  /\
> [Puppetmaster and CA][Puppetmaster]
> |  \   /| 
> |  \/   |
> |  \ /  |   
> [Foreman]  [Foreman]
> \  /
>\/
>   \   /
>   [Postgresql]
>
>
> But my problem is, the 2 machines with puppet will not connected to 2 
> foreman machines with foreman-proxy
>
> How i change this to a complete HA?
>
> PS: the Postgresql is in a master-slave machine.
>
>
> Tks!
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [foreman-users] Ubuntu Preseed - Bond/vlans - anyone have a last_command that works for this?

2016-07-18 Thread Greg Sutcliffe 
On 18 July 2016 at 16:50, Byron Miller  wrote:

> Anyone have any working hacks to get ubuntu to provision & bring up
> bonds/tagged vlans? Preseed looks super limited to 1 interface and i've had
> people recommend writing a "last_command" shell script to do it.. just
> curious if there is anything out there..
>
> There appears to be support for VLANs in this snippet[1] - I don't see
bonds, but I'm sure patches would be welcome :)

[1]
https://github.com/theforeman/community-templates/blob/develop/snippets/preseed_networking_setup.erb

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[foreman-users] Ubuntu Preseed - Bond/vlans - anyone have a last_command that works for this?

2016-07-18 Thread Byron Miller 
Anyone have any working hacks to get ubuntu to provision & bring up 
bonds/tagged vlans? Preseed looks super limited to 1 interface and i've had 
people recommend writing a "last_command" shell script to do it.. just 
curious if there is anything out there..

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[foreman-users] [Katello] Attaching subscriptions/products no longer adds yum repo

2016-07-18 Thread Peter Kirby 
I'm facing an issue where when I attach a subscription via
"subscription-manger attach --pool xxx" is successfully
attaches the subscription, but redhat.repo is not longer updated to include
the new repo data.

This has happened before and I ended up just wiping the entire foreman
server and rebuilding it fresh.  Everything worked fine after that, but now
the problem has returned.  I can't just rebuild everything every few weeks.

I've checked all the log files I could find including
/var/log/rhsm/rhsm.log and I cannot find any errors.

I've tried deleting the rhsm cache and running subscription-manager
refresh, but nothing changes redhat.repo anymore.

Has anyone run into this before or have any suggestions for things to try?

Thank you,
Peter



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[foreman-users] Foreman with separate puppet in HA

2016-07-18 Thread Kelvyn Tomaz 
HI,

I'm Kelvyn and i implementing puppet in my office, but my foreman server 
today not supporting all of my puppet nodes (in total 26 nodes) because 
this machine is very old and slow.

And i like to migrate to a strong infrastructure to supporting +500 nodes, 
and i like to put in HA


The infrastructure purpose is that


   [Load Balancer]
/  \
   /\
  /  \
 /\
[Puppetmaster and CA][Puppetmaster]
|  \   /| 
|  \/   |
|  \ /  |   
[Foreman]  [Foreman]
\  /
   \/
  \   /
  [Postgresql]


But my problem is, the 2 machines with puppet will not connected to 2 
foreman machines with foreman-proxy

How i change this to a complete HA?

PS: the Postgresql is in a master-slave machine.


Tks!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Katello 3.1 RC1 Released

2016-07-18 Thread Duncan Innes 
Sorry - for installation.

Was just taking the Foreman installation OS options as examples here.

Ideally I'd run Katello on a CentOS7 guest, but the host OS will be Fedora 
24 for which I'll be trying to get libvirt smart-proxy working.

D

On Monday, 18 July 2016 14:09:13 UTC+1, Eric Helms wrote:
>
> For installation purposes or client support?
>
> On Jul 18, 2016 8:10 AM, "Duncan Innes"  
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is Katello 3.1 not going to support the same OS platforms as Foreman 1.12 
>> is doing?
>>
>> i.e. Fedora 24 for my purpose, but others may look to Debian & Ubuntu
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Duncan
>>
>> On Monday, 11 July 2016 13:52:50 UTC+1, jsherril wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> We are happy to announce the first release candidate for Katello 3.1 
>>> (California Common). 
>>>
>>> Your help is appreciated to ensure our GA release is solid, by either 
>>> installing a new instance or upgrading a test server. 
>>>
>>> A list of the changes in Katello 3.1 is in our release notes: 
>>> http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/release_notes/release_notes.html 
>>>
>>>
>>> Installation or Upgrade 
>>> === 
>>>
>>> For installation, please see the instructions at: 
>>>
>>>   Server:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/installation/index.html 
>>>   Capsule:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/installation/capsule.html 
>>>
>>> For those testing upgrades, please use the instructions below and file 
>>> any issues you encounter. Please note that there are separate upgrade 
>>> instructions for the Katello server and Capsules: 
>>>
>>>   Server:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/upgrade/index.html 
>>>   Capsule:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/upgrade/capsule.html 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bug reporting 
>>> = 
>>> If you come across a bug in your testing, please file it and note the 
>>> version of Katello that you're using in the report and set the release 
>>> to 3.1.0. 
>>>
>>>   http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/katello/issues/new 
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Foreman users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to foreman-user...@googlegroups.com .
>> To post to this group, send email to forema...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Katello 3.1 RC1 Released

2016-07-18 Thread Eric D Helms 
For installation purposes or client support?

On Jul 18, 2016 8:10 AM, "Duncan Innes"  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is Katello 3.1 not going to support the same OS platforms as Foreman 1.12
> is doing?
>
> i.e. Fedora 24 for my purpose, but others may look to Debian & Ubuntu
>
> Cheers
>
> Duncan
>
> On Monday, 11 July 2016 13:52:50 UTC+1, jsherril wrote:
>>
>>
>> We are happy to announce the first release candidate for Katello 3.1
>> (California Common).
>>
>> Your help is appreciated to ensure our GA release is solid, by either
>> installing a new instance or upgrading a test server.
>>
>> A list of the changes in Katello 3.1 is in our release notes:
>> http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/release_notes/release_notes.html
>>
>>
>> Installation or Upgrade
>> ===
>>
>> For installation, please see the instructions at:
>>
>>   Server:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/installation/index.html
>>   Capsule:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/installation/capsule.html
>>
>> For those testing upgrades, please use the instructions below and file
>> any issues you encounter. Please note that there are separate upgrade
>> instructions for the Katello server and Capsules:
>>
>>   Server:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/upgrade/index.html
>>   Capsule:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/upgrade/capsule.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Bug reporting
>> =
>> If you come across a bug in your testing, please file it and note the
>> version of Katello that you're using in the report and set the release
>> to 3.1.0.
>>
>>   http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/katello/issues/new
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Foreman users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[foreman-users] Re: Katello 3.1 RC1 Released

2016-07-18 Thread Duncan Innes 
Hi,

Is Katello 3.1 not going to support the same OS platforms as Foreman 1.12 
is doing?

i.e. Fedora 24 for my purpose, but others may look to Debian & Ubuntu

Cheers

Duncan

On Monday, 11 July 2016 13:52:50 UTC+1, jsherril wrote:
>
>
> We are happy to announce the first release candidate for Katello 3.1 
> (California Common). 
>
> Your help is appreciated to ensure our GA release is solid, by either 
> installing a new instance or upgrading a test server. 
>
> A list of the changes in Katello 3.1 is in our release notes: 
> http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/release_notes/release_notes.html 
>
>
> Installation or Upgrade 
> === 
>
> For installation, please see the instructions at: 
>
>   Server:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/installation/index.html 
>   Capsule:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/installation/capsule.html 
>
> For those testing upgrades, please use the instructions below and file 
> any issues you encounter. Please note that there are separate upgrade 
> instructions for the Katello server and Capsules: 
>
>   Server:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/upgrade/index.html 
>   Capsule:  http://www.katello.org/docs/3.1/upgrade/capsule.html 
>
>
>
> Bug reporting 
> = 
> If you come across a bug in your testing, please file it and note the 
> version of Katello that you're using in the report and set the release 
> to 3.1.0. 
>
>   http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/katello/issues/new 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [foreman-users] Help Needed to setup LDAP on Katello 3.1

2016-07-18 Thread Daniel Lobato Garcia 
On 07/14, NLinux wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> I'm new to Katello/Foreman and trying to setup the LDAP authentication on
> Katello.
>
> I've tried to setup the basic information but still I'm unable to get it
> working.

It's hard to know what problem exactly you're facing with such little
information, so:

What exactly isn't working?
Do you understand the fields in the form?
When you click on 'test connection' after inputting the data you wanted,
does it work?

>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> NLinux
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Foreman users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
Daniel Lobato Garcia

@dLobatog
blog.daniellobato.me
daniellobato.me

GPG: http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=get=0x7A92D6DD38D6DE30
Keybase: https://keybase.io/elobato

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature