Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-23 Thread Keegan Peterzell
In other words[1].

1.http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Nobody_cares

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Steven Walling
steven.wall...@gmail.comwrote:

 People on ED are exactly the same as 4chan: they are in it for the lulz.[1]

 They will probably always write these attack pages/satire/whatever term you
 prefer. We're mostly pretty odd folk, so it's easy to make fun. But giving
 them attention of any kind is what they want most, since it gives them an
 opportunity for more mischief (and thus more lulz).

 In other words, don't feed.

 Steven Walling

 1. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lulz


-- 
~Keegan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-23 Thread Keegan Peterzell
I think I should clarify, I meant that nobody cares unless you make them
care.  Otherwise, nobody cares.

On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Keegan Peterzell keegan.w...@gmail.comwrote:

 In other words[1].

 1.http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Nobody_cares


 On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Steven Walling steven.wall...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 People on ED are exactly the same as 4chan: they are in it for the
 lulz.[1]

 They will probably always write these attack pages/satire/whatever term
 you
 prefer. We're mostly pretty odd folk, so it's easy to make fun. But giving
 them attention of any kind is what they want most, since it gives them an
 opportunity for more mischief (and thus more lulz).

 In other words, don't feed.

 Steven Walling

 1. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lulz


 --
 ~Keegan

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan




-- 
~Keegan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-23 Thread Milos Rancic
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 17:00, M. Williamson node...@gmail.com wrote:
 Whatever happened to freedom of speech? Encyclopedia Dramatica is a
 parody site. Plenty of people have tried to shut them down before,
 it's unlikely to ever happen (and in my opinion, should never happen).
 If they have an offensive article about you, trying to get rid of it
 will probably make it worse.

What I do worry is the fact that we are not interesting to them
anymore. It looks that they've stopped with adding new content related
to Wikipedia two or three years ago.

Being uninteresting to satirists means that you are not important anymore.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-22 Thread James Heilman
Encyc. Dramatica seems too take pride in creating attack pages regarding
Wikipedians. Of course they are exposing themselves to libel suits but
looking at some of the rest of their site this seems to be the least of
their worries with a great deal of racist content as well as underage
pornography.

Wondering if we have any measures available to deal with these attacks
against Wikipedia? Or have others who have considered this issue feel that
attempting anything would 1) be futile 2) just promote the creation /
promotion of more such content.
-- 
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, B.Sc.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-22 Thread M. Williamson
Whatever happened to freedom of speech? Encyclopedia Dramatica is a
parody site. Plenty of people have tried to shut them down before,
it's unlikely to ever happen (and in my opinion, should never happen).
If they have an offensive article about you, trying to get rid of it
will probably make it worse.

2010/10/22 James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com:
 Encyc. Dramatica seems too take pride in creating attack pages regarding
 Wikipedians. Of course they are exposing themselves to libel suits but
 looking at some of the rest of their site this seems to be the least of
 their worries with a great deal of racist content as well as underage
 pornography.

 Wondering if we have any measures available to deal with these attacks
 against Wikipedia? Or have others who have considered this issue feel that
 attempting anything would 1) be futile 2) just promote the creation /
 promotion of more such content.
 --
 James Heilman
 MD, CCFP-EM, B.Sc.
 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-22 Thread Nathan
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, M. Williamson node...@gmail.com wrote:
 Whatever happened to freedom of speech? Encyclopedia Dramatica is a
 parody site. Plenty of people have tried to shut them down before,
 it's unlikely to ever happen (and in my opinion, should never happen).
 If they have an offensive article about you, trying to get rid of it
 will probably make it worse.



In almost any jurisdiction, freedom of speech has exceptions that
include obscenity, defamation, certain types of hate speech, threats,
etc. You can generally find all of those at ED; such speech isn't
protected, nor should it be.

Nathan

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-22 Thread Austin Hair
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:44 PM, James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com wrote:
 Encyc. Dramatica seems too take pride in creating attack pages regarding
 Wikipedians. Of course they are exposing themselves to libel suits but
 looking at some of the rest of their site this seems to be the least of
 their worries with a great deal of racist content as well as underage
 pornography.

 Wondering if we have any measures available to deal with these attacks
 against Wikipedia? Or have others who have considered this issue feel that
 attempting anything would 1) be futile 2) just promote the creation /
 promotion of more such content.

Well, Encyclopedia Dramatica is a special sort of case that seasoned
veterans of the Internet recognize, and is probably best described as
satire taken to (or even beyond) an extreme (a la 4chan).  It may not
always be appreciated, but ED editors generally aren't writing with
malice, and if they are it's so absurd that nobody really gets hurt
over it.

Hell, I'm on ED, and I'm not filing a libel suit.  If they violate
local laws, that's up to those government agencies to enforce, but if
Wikimedians were go go on a crusade against them I think you'd wind up
with #2.

Austin

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-22 Thread Fred Bauder
 Whatever happened to freedom of speech? Encyclopedia Dramatica is a
 parody site. Plenty of people have tried to shut them down before,
 it's unlikely to ever happen (and in my opinion, should never happen).
 If they have an offensive article about you, trying to get rid of it
 will probably make it worse.

I don't think anyone has actually tried to shut them down, as anyone who
could is familiar with parody. They are not immune to libel suits and
there is reason to believe the queen bee lives in the UK. However, that
said, it's a waste of time. They may, however, be more responsive to
complaints than is generally believed.

Fred


___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-22 Thread Steven Walling
People on ED are exactly the same as 4chan: they are in it for the lulz.[1]

They will probably always write these attack pages/satire/whatever term you
prefer. We're mostly pretty odd folk, so it's easy to make fun. But giving
them attention of any kind is what they want most, since it gives them an
opportunity for more mischief (and thus more lulz).

In other words, don't feed.

Steven Walling

1. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lulz

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:

  Whatever happened to freedom of speech? Encyclopedia Dramatica is a
  parody site. Plenty of people have tried to shut them down before,
  it's unlikely to ever happen (and in my opinion, should never happen).
  If they have an offensive article about you, trying to get rid of it
  will probably make it worse.

 I don't think anyone has actually tried to shut them down, as anyone who
 could is familiar with parody. They are not immune to libel suits and
 there is reason to believe the queen bee lives in the UK. However, that
 said, it's a waste of time. They may, however, be more responsive to
 complaints than is generally believed.

 Fred


 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-22 Thread Mike Dupont
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:44 PM, James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com wrote:
 Encyc. Dramatica seems too take pride in creating attack pages regarding
 Wikipedians. Of course they are exposing themselves to libel suits but

wow, now I have an excuse to finally look at this page! I did not look
at the p0nr pages that were posted last time on this list, but this ED
might be worth reading. Up till now, only 15 year old hyperactive kids
talked about ED, but now it is serious business, it is on the WMFL!

thanks,
mike

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-22 Thread Anirudh Bhati
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Steven Walling
steven.wall...@gmail.com wrote:
 People on ED are exactly the same as 4chan: they are in it for the lulz.[1]

 They will probably always write these attack pages/satire/whatever term you
 prefer. We're mostly pretty odd folk, so it's easy to make fun. But giving
 them attention of any kind is what they want most, since it gives them an
 opportunity for more mischief (and thus more lulz).

 In other words, don't feed.

Unless they are exposing sensitive and private information (facts)
about you or someone you know.

Anirudh Bhati

00 91 9328712208
Skype: anirudhsbh


 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Attack pages at Encyc. Dramatica

2010-10-22 Thread theo10011
Like Steven said ED is in it for the lulz. So please don't feed the trolls
(I know a few editors from en:wp that are on ED).

In terms of legal standing, US has much less plaintiff-friendly Defamation
laws than most European Countries, and most differ widely from state to
state. I don't think you would have an easy case in any jurisdiction.

Think of it along the lines Celebrity blogs, Probably congratulate those who
have their own page on ED.

LULZ abound.

Regards

Theo

On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Anirudh Bhati anirudh...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Steven Walling
 steven.wall...@gmail.com wrote:
  People on ED are exactly the same as 4chan: they are in it for the
 lulz.[1]
 
  They will probably always write these attack pages/satire/whatever term
 you
  prefer. We're mostly pretty odd folk, so it's easy to make fun. But
 giving
  them attention of any kind is what they want most, since it gives them an
  opportunity for more mischief (and thus more lulz).
 
  In other words, don't feed.

 Unless they are exposing sensitive and private information (facts)
 about you or someone you know.

 Anirudh Bhati

 00 91 9328712208
 Skype: anirudhsbh


  ___
  foundation-l mailing list
  foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
 

 ___
 foundation-l mailing list
 foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l