Re: GNOME ASIA logo competition

[Mathieu Bridon via foundation-list]

On Tue, 2019-07-02 at 09:14 +0200, Felipe Borges wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:11 AM Richard Stallman  wrote:
> > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please
> > consider]]]
> > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all
> > enemies, ]]]
> > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
> > ]]]
> > 
> >   > There are 29 logos competing with each other and you can vote
> > for your 3
> >   > favorites by leaving a comment here:
> >   > https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Events/GNOMEAsia/issues/46
> > 
> > I am sad to report that this page seems to require nonfree
> > Javascript
> > code.  Looking at the page with LibreJS to protect me from nonfree
> > Javascript code, I don't see any of the logos.
> > 
> > Would you please post them so that they can be seen in the Free
> > World?
> > Please do not make running a nonfree program a precondition for
> > participating in some Gnome activities.
> 
> This page is hosted in our own infrastructure.

It's also entirely free software Javascript code, since we use Gitlab
Community Edition, not the nonfree Enterprise Edition.

The problem here is LibreJS not being able to realize this is free
software, so you should talk about it with them instead.


-- 
Mathieu

___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

Re: CoC Enforcement Training Interest

[Mathieu Bridon]

On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 15:50 -0700, Nuritzi Sanchez wrote:
> Hi Foundation Members, 
> 
> Rosanna and I are thinking of participating in a Code of Conduct
> (CoC) enforcement workshop run by Sarah Sharp on Sunday, November
> 26th in SF. The event is tentative now, but we would like to know who
> else might be interested in attending, either virtually or in person,
> just so we know how large the interest is. We may propose holding a
> separate large event if there's enough interest. 
> 
> The workshop would include running through some common "tough
> situations" and learning tips on how to handle them. Our goal in
> going is to gain some insights into how to better shape the GNOME
> Event CoC we have started and also get ideas on how to train local
> events organizers. 
> 
> Let us know if you're interested and thanks!

Could we have one of these workshops at GUADEC? :)


-- 
Mathieu
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

Re: User Data Manifesto

[Mathieu Bridon]

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 12:31 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> Philip Withnall  wrote:
> ...
> > Now that we’ve endorsed it (yay!), what are we going to do about
> > it?
> > Should we do a review of GNOME apps to make sure they all comply
> > where
> > necessary? A GNOME Goal, maybe?
> 
> That's a good question.
> 
> The manifesto primarily refers to cloud providers, so I'm not really
> sure that we can put it into effect ourselves. However, what I would
> like to do is work on our own privacy policy (which we could
> implement), and to hopefully use that as the basis of collaborations
> with the user data manifesto people in the future.
> 
> Also, we can help by doing marketing and promotional work, if there
> are announcements that we can recirculate and so on. That would be a
> good thing to talk to the Engagement Team about.

How about adding a small emblem in the list of account providers (in
Settings -> Online Accounts), for those cloud providers respecting the
user data manifesto?

And that emblem could be clickable, opening a browser to the manifesto
website, in case users are interested?


-- 
Mathieu
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list