Re: Technical and legal aspects of pitivi's crowdfunding campaign.

2013-12-17 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

The MediaGoblin developer is paid as an independent contractor of the FSF,
not as an employee.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org  www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
  Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.

___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


Re: Technical and legal aspects of pitivi's crowdfunding campaign.

2013-12-16 Thread meg ford
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:

 Have there been any thoughts about a third option: actually having the
 Foundation hire the people?

 There are probably several downsides (in terms of costs; in terms of
 legal paperwork, as I understand that this is about French people and
 the Foundation is still kind of US-centric for that matter; in terms of
 involvement from the Foundation; etc.). But on the other hand, it might
 make sense to at least think whether it's a good idea for the Foundation
 to employ developers.


MediaGoblin uses this model -- they raised money through a Free Software
Foundation campaign and their developer is, I believe, legally an employee
of the FSF. So it may make sense to ask the FSF for information about how
they handle this, since it might give you some useful ideas.
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


Re: Technical and legal aspects of pitivi's crowdfunding campaign.

2013-12-16 Thread Mathieu Duponchelle
Hello,

Hi,
Le vendredi 13 décembre 2013, à 19:37 +0100, Mathieu Duponchelle a écrit :
Hi everyone !

Following a discussion with Karen Sandler and other members of the
gnome engagement team in the #engagement channel on gimpnet,
it was decided that a mail to that list would be necessary, to
expose the legal and technical aspects of the crowdfunding campaign
we are about to start around the pitivi video editor.

I might have missed some info about this campaign, but it's the first
time I hear about it: it would be good if you could summarize the goals
and so on :-) Anyhow, I wish you the best!

So, the Pitivi team, composed of its 3 current maintainer decided a while
back to try to launch a fundraising campaign with the ambitious goal of
bringing the pitivi video editor to a robust state, making sure all the
components of its stack are solid enough to support its ambition of
becoming a professional grade video editing software. The plan is to have 2
phases during the actual development time:

   - Work package 1: Stabilization to reach the long awaited *1.0 release*


   - Work package 2: Implement top-wanted features (backers should be a
   llowed to vote so we can determine what these are?)


You can find a quick overview of the plan at
http://gstreamer.bugsfree.org:8080/#plan and all the full detailed version
at http://gstreamer.bugsfree.org:8080/the-plan -- Keep in mind that this is
still Work in Progres, and if we would be glad to get some feeback from you.

The team behind this initiative is composed of:

   - Jean Francois Fortin Tam, designer, bug triager, manager and
   maintainer of Pitivi, he is in the Gnome community since 2005 and you
   probably already know him.


   - Mathieu Duponchelle, GSoCer in the Gnome project in 2011 and 2013, he
   has been working on pitivi since then, and thanks to his GSoC project
   (again under the gnome umbrella) in 2013, we finally managed to release
   a 0.91 beta release based on the new stack we have been building for
   2years+ (namely GES, GI, Gst1.0 etc...)


   - Thibault Saunier,  GSoCer under the gnome umbrella in 2009 and 2010 he
   has been the main developer of pitivi, and GES since 2011


You can find some more details about us at:
http://gstreamer.bugsfree.org:8080/#about-us

If you have more question about the project/who we are etc. we would be
happy to talk with you, we are always connected on #pitivi.

One quick question:
On our side, there are two options we could go for, with
different charges and laws associated :

1) We can create a non-profit association.

2) We can create a regular Limited Liability Company (LLC),
  SARL in French.
Have there been any thoughts about a third option: actually having the
Foundation hire the people?

There are probably several downsides (in terms of costs; in terms of
legal paperwork, as I understand that this is about French people and
the Foundation is still kind of US-centric for that matter; in terms of
involvement from the Foundation; etc.). But on the other hand, it might
make sense to at least think whether it's a good idea for the Foundation
to employ developers.

I am not sure what you have in mind here, the solution we are proposing
should be pretty straight forward in term of paperwork for the Gnome
fundation.

Best Regards,

Thibault Saunier.



On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Mathieu Duponchelle 
mduponchel...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi everyone !

 Following a discussion with Karen Sandler and other members of the
 gnome engagement team in the #engagement channel on gimpnet,
 it was decided that a mail to that list would be necessary, to
 expose the legal and technical aspects of the crowdfunding campaign
 we are about to start around the pitivi video editor.

 Presentations of the team, our plan etc are available on the website
 we are currently developing and creating content for, bear in mind
 that it's still work in progress at the time. I'll post a link to
 that website soon, Thibault Saunier is not at his home and can't
 can't make it available right now.

 We've been happy to learn the GNOME committee had voted unanimously
 to help us handle the funds we'll get through that campaign for multiple
 reasons :

 + First we are not very keen on using proprietary services such as
   kickstarter and indiegogo, as they are not part of our ecosystem.

 + Second, pitivi has always been a very gnome-centric app at
   the technology level, all of our main components are GLib based
   and we intend to go on that way, so this partnership seemed like
   a logical continuation to us.

 As for our pay, we intend to go for quite low standards for
 CS engineers, and require 2500 euros a month, working 7 hours
 21 days a month, which translates to a 17 euros hourly rate.
 I don't have official average salaries for CS engineers to submit,
 but as an example I'm currently making 3000 euros a month at my position.
 Money isn't really the issue for us, as we are ready to get less
 in exchange of doing what we 

Re: Technical and legal aspects of pitivi's crowdfunding campaign.

2013-12-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 16 décembre 2013, à 16:38 +0100, Mathieu Duponchelle a écrit :
 One quick question:
 On our side, there are two options we could go for, with
 different charges and laws associated :
 
 1) We can create a non-profit association.
 
 2) We can create a regular Limited Liability Company (LLC),
   SARL in French.
 Have there been any thoughts about a third option: actually having the
 Foundation hire the people?
 
 There are probably several downsides (in terms of costs; in terms of
 legal paperwork, as I understand that this is about French people and
 the Foundation is still kind of US-centric for that matter; in terms of
 involvement from the Foundation; etc.). But on the other hand, it might
 make sense to at least think whether it's a good idea for the Foundation
 to employ developers.
 
 I am not sure what you have in mind here, the solution we are proposing
 should be pretty straight forward in term of paperwork for the Gnome
 fundation.

I'm not saying your proposed options are bad. I'm suggesting to step
back a bit and consider if it makes sense for the Foundation to hire
developers (in this case, the pitivi maintainers) in general, and
consider a longer term investment, instead of contracting external
people.

Cheers,

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


Re: Technical and legal aspects of pitivi's crowdfunding campaign.

2013-12-15 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi,

Le vendredi 13 décembre 2013, à 19:37 +0100, Mathieu Duponchelle a écrit :
 Hi everyone !
 
 Following a discussion with Karen Sandler and other members of the
 gnome engagement team in the #engagement channel on gimpnet,
 it was decided that a mail to that list would be necessary, to
 expose the legal and technical aspects of the crowdfunding campaign
 we are about to start around the pitivi video editor.

I might have missed some info about this campaign, but it's the first
time I hear about it: it would be good if you could summarize the goals
and so on :-) Anyhow, I wish you the best!

One quick question:

 On our side, there are two options we could go for, with
 different charges and laws associated :
 
 1) We can create a non-profit association.
 
 2) We can create a regular Limited Liability Company (LLC),
   SARL in French.

Have there been any thoughts about a third option: actually having the
Foundation hire the people?

There are probably several downsides (in terms of costs; in terms of
legal paperwork, as I understand that this is about French people and
the Foundation is still kind of US-centric for that matter; in terms of
involvement from the Foundation; etc.). But on the other hand, it might
make sense to at least think whether it's a good idea for the Foundation
to employ developers.

Cheers,

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list