RE: Open-loop detection on analog output cards

2001-05-16 Thread Sloan, Dennis E(Z99609)

We do exactly that.  We have a few FBM 4.s where we take the output and feed
it back to an AIN block then use an alarm block (differential alarm).  Seems
to work very well.

Dennis Sloan
Arizona Public Service
 

-Original Message-
From: Loyd Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 5:39 PM
To: Foxboro DCS Mail List
Subject: Re: Open-loop detection on analog output cards


Would it be possible to loop the 4-20 ma output  through a 4-20 ma input and
alarm it in the ain  block? Another way might be to add a low value resistor
in the loop and monitor a voltage drop across it with an FBM 02.This would
take an extra input for each loop. I do not know what type of isolation
problem, if any, you might run into. I would wire it to a different FBM. If
this would work it would save you from
having to install a position transmitter on the valve.

Loyd Greer

 Original Message -
From: Rick Rys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Foxboro DCS Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 6:52 PM
Subject: RE: Open-loop detection on analog output cards


 Let's assume you have an FBM 04 with ECB type 2, and a simple AIN, PID(A),
 AOUT analog control loop.  Next you remove the wiring at the FBM terminal
 for the 4-20ma output for this channel.

 The CP is good, the fieldbus is good, and the FBM is good. ECB Failsafe is
 not enabled. The field wiring is bad (open), however, and the valve is
 getting 0ma and thus going to it's failure state.  You will likely be
 getting some alarms soon enough, but I understand why you might want to
get
 an alarm immediately.  This might be possible with intelligent
transmitters,
 but it is my understanding that the FBM04 is not smart enough to identify
a
 single open loop output.  Inputs would be caught by out of range, but I
 don't think there is any way to detect a bad output short of a valve
 position transmitter with some type of deviation alarming scheme.  In the
 AOUT block the BAO when set to 1 has alarming looking at BAD (BO193AX
Block
 Book).  BAD is set from the OPSTAT of the ECB block (with some logic I
could
 not find), but the ECB is only setting the BAD based on communication
 related errors (see ECB Block description) and not disconnected output
 wires.  You can look at BAD, OPSTAT, or ECBSTA to verify that nothing is
 showing as bad. Maybe someone else could verify this behavior as I didn't
 check it on real hardware.

 Rick Rys
 R2 Controls



 ---
 This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All
 postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty
 is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated
 through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the
 list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to
 your application of information received from this mailing list.

 To be removed from this list, send mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Open-loop detection on analog output cards

2001-05-16 Thread Corey R Clingo

Yes, but it would be much cleaner if it were just part of the AO FBM's onboard
diagnostics.  I would even settle for a single A/D for all output channels,
multiplexed between them on a 5 or 10 second cycle, if circuitry or PC board
space is an issue.

Thanks to all who responded.

Corey Clingo
Sr. Engineer
BASF Corporation




Would it be possible to loop the 4-20 ma output  through a 4-20 ma input and
alarm it in the ain  block? Another way might be to add a low value resistor
in the loop and monitor a voltage drop across it with an FBM 02.This would
take an extra input for each loop. I do not know what type of isolation
problem, if any, you might run into. I would wire it to a different FBM. If
this would work it would save you from
having to install a position transmitter on the valve.

Loyd Greer





---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Open-loop detection on analog output cards

2001-05-13 Thread Corey R Clingo

To answer Kevin Fitzgerrell's question, I am opening the loop at the FBM.
Neither the detail display nor system management shows anything awry.  The
output is therefore not initialized and can be manipulated.

My experience agrees with what Rick Rys said.  I was hoping that the FBM could
be coerced into reading back its loop output current and comparing it with what
was being asked for by the FBM, and alarm if these were different.  The other
system I have experience with (Honeywell) does this and generates an alarm and
initializes upstream blocks if the commanded output current and the actual loop
current do not agree.  It is a handy troubleshooting tool and I miss it :-(

Corey Clingo
Sr. Engineer
BASF Corp.



---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Open-loop detection on analog output cards

2001-05-10 Thread Fitzgerrell Kevin

How/where are you opening the loop?
Have you checked the block's detail display to see if you are getting
any indication there?

Regards,

Kevin FitzGerrell

--- Corey R Clingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Pardon me for being
ignorant, but how does one implement open-loop
 detection on
 analog outputs?  I have tried setting BAO to 1, but opening the loop
 still does
 not generate an alarm.
 
 TIA,
 
 Corey Clingo
 Sr. Engineer
 BASF Corporation
 


_
http://messenger.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger
- Voice chat, mail alerts, stock quotes and favourite news and lots more!

---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Open-loop detection on analog output cards

2001-05-10 Thread Rick Rys

Let's assume you have an FBM 04 with ECB type 2, and a simple AIN, PID(A),
AOUT analog control loop.  Next you remove the wiring at the FBM terminal
for the 4-20ma output for this channel.

The CP is good, the fieldbus is good, and the FBM is good. ECB Failsafe is
not enabled. The field wiring is bad (open), however, and the valve is
getting 0ma and thus going to it's failure state.  You will likely be
getting some alarms soon enough, but I understand why you might want to get
an alarm immediately.  This might be possible with intelligent transmitters,
but it is my understanding that the FBM04 is not smart enough to identify a
single open loop output.  Inputs would be caught by out of range, but I
don't think there is any way to detect a bad output short of a valve
position transmitter with some type of deviation alarming scheme.  In the
AOUT block the BAO when set to 1 has alarming looking at BAD (BO193AX Block
Book).  BAD is set from the OPSTAT of the ECB block (with some logic I could
not find), but the ECB is only setting the BAD based on communication
related errors (see ECB Block description) and not disconnected output
wires.  You can look at BAD, OPSTAT, or ECBSTA to verify that nothing is
showing as bad. Maybe someone else could verify this behavior as I didn't
check it on real hardware.

Rick Rys
R2 Controls



---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]