Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 3.0.0-rc1 release
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:50:50 +0400, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl wrote: We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers. This bugs is unworthy to be released in 3.0 :) http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=27349 http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=26982 -- Kazantsev Alexey ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 3.0.0-rc1 release
In our previous episode, LacaK said: i386, x86_64, PowerPC or Sparc processor Win32: - MS Windows NT/2000/2003/XP/Vista/7 (Win95, 98 and ME are not supported in FPC officially any longer). But here is Win95,98,Me explicitly excluded. I think, that at first place it should be also excluded. Yup, and remove w2k and NT(4) too. While they might work, they are no longer formally supported and tested afaik. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 3.0.0-rc1 release
Am 26.08.2015 08:36 schrieb Kazantsev Alexey kazantsev.ale...@mail.ru: On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:50:50 +0400, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl wrote: We have placed the first release candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler version 3.0.0 on our ftp servers. This bugs is unworthy to be released in 3.0 :) http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=27349 http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=26982 These are not even fixed in trunk, so how do you expect them to be fixed in the RC? Also we have other bugs as it is and if we'd postpone a release until all are fixed you'd never get a release. Regards, Sven ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 3.0.0-rc1 release
In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said: Win32: - MS Windows NT/2000/2003/XP/Vista/7 (Win95, 98 and ME are not supported in FPC officially any longer). But here is Win95,98,Me explicitly excluded. I think, that at first place it should be also excluded. Yup, and remove w2k and NT(4) too. While they might work, they are no longer formally supported and tested afaik. Question is: if the first is the target system and the latter the host system? Former, latter refer to what? Since we are self-hosting not being a target precludes being an host, and being target only is not well, since the RTL probably uses calls from after NT4 and w2k. (unicode and threading/synchronization I would guess) Point is that it isn't tested even occasionally, so I would not guarantee anything in a release manifest. Maybe subsets work, but maybe not (if some newer function is always linked in) ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 3.0.0-rc1 release
Am 26.08.2015 um 08:45 schrieb Marco van de Voort: In our previous episode, LacaK said: i386, x86_64, PowerPC or Sparc processor Win32: - MS Windows NT/2000/2003/XP/Vista/7 (Win95, 98 and ME are not supported in FPC officially any longer). But here is Win95,98,Me explicitly excluded. I think, that at first place it should be also excluded. Yup, and remove w2k and NT(4) too. While they might work, they are no longer formally supported and tested afaik. Question is: if the first is the target system and the latter the host system? ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
