Re: [fpc-devel] CFI
Op 07-06-2022 om 14:07 schreef Jonas Maebe via fpc-devel: On 2022-06-07 11:09, Joost van der Sluis via fpc-devel wrote: This is a snippet of the information that the compiler typically generates: (x86_64-linux) fde: < 0><0x00401090:0x004010c1> 0x00401090: 0x00401091: r16=-8(cfa) > 0x004010c0: This basically means that when the instruction-pointer is at 0x00401090, the CFA (frame) can be obtained by taking register 7 (rsp) and add 8 to it. The return address (called r16 here) if obtained by taking the CFA, substract 8 and then read the value at that memory location. So far so good. But then I need the next frame. So use the return address, substract one (To obtain the call address). And start over... but, the value of r7 is not available anymore. The CFA (call frame address) is defined as "the value of %rsp at the call site in the previous frame" (*). So the value you calculated above in the first rule is the value of r7 in the previous frame and the call site address. Thanks, also for the link. Good to know that it is defined officially that way. Regards, Joost ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Re: [fpc-devel] CFI
On 2022-06-07 11:09, Joost van der Sluis via fpc-devel wrote: This is a snippet of the information that the compiler typically generates: (x86_64-linux) fde: <0><0x00401090:0x004010c1> 0x00401090: 0x00401091: r16=-8(cfa) > 0x004010c0: This basically means that when the instruction-pointer is at 0x00401090, the CFA (frame) can be obtained by taking register 7 (rsp) and add 8 to it. The return address (called r16 here) if obtained by taking the CFA, substract 8 and then read the value at that memory location. So far so good. But then I need the next frame. So use the return address, substract one (To obtain the call address). And start over... but, the value of r7 is not available anymore. The CFA (call frame address) is defined as "the value of %rsp at the call site in the previous frame" (*). So the value you calculated above in the first rule is the value of r7 in the previous frame and the call site address. Jonas (*) https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/jobs/2486914365/artifacts/download, definition of _Unwind_GetCFA ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
[fpc-devel] CFI
Hi all, I'm working on FpDebug to add support for the Call Frame Information (CFI) which is part of the Dwarf specification. (Version 2 onwards) This is a snippet of the information that the compiler typically generates: (x86_64-linux) fde: <0><0x00401090:0x004010c1> 0> 0x00401090: 0x00401091: r16=-8(cfa) > 0x004010c0: This basically means that when the instruction-pointer is at 0x00401090, the CFA (frame) can be obtained by taking register 7 (rsp) and add 8 to it. The return address (called r16 here) if obtained by taking the CFA, substract 8 and then read the value at that memory location. So far so good. But then I need the next frame. So use the return address, substract one (To obtain the call address). And start over... but, the value of r7 is not available anymore. But it seems like it that GDB has no problem with it. This is what the Dwarf-5 specs say: (We/FPC always create CFI version 1 information, which corresponds with Dwarf-2, but the description in Dwarf-5 is easier to understand.) "The default rule for all columns before interpretation of the initial instructions is the undefined rule. However, an ABI authoring body or a compilation system authoring body may specify an alternate default value for any or all columns." 'Undefined' means that the register is not available. So in principle we can not unwind the stack more the one level using the CFI provided by FreePascal. Unless there is some ABI rule that overrules the value of the r7 register. Does anyone know if this is the case. And what are those ABI rules precisely, or should we add a column to the CFI information to describe r7? Regards, Joost. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
