Re: [fpc-devel] FreePascal on ARM Linux ,SoftFloat and EABI issues

2008-12-13 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd

Michael Schnell wrote:

The next stage is to develop X apps using Lazarus. But for these I 
need to get FPC working.

Do you really want to run Lazarus on the ARM-system ?

While this _should_ be possible somehow, It might be quite slow compared 
to what can be done on a PC with cross-compiling.


Lazarus 0.9.27 runs on an ARM system based on Debian Etch without 
significant problems and adequately fast. The key is to use something 
like FluxBox rather than KDE.


I was tempted to post this using Mozilla running on an ARM system, but 
hopefully I don't need to go to that extreme to make the point that ARM 
is a viable development host as well as a target.


--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] FreePascal on ARM Linux ,SoftFloat and EABI issues

2008-06-02 Thread Michael Schnell


Let me remind you that i am dont use a Cross compiler, but an emulated 
Arm machine.
  
That is interesting, but is it really useful ? Cross-compiling seems 
more standard. In this forum there seem to be several ARM-CE-users, 
but ARM-Linux seems not to be very common right now. I'm very interested 
in that as (not before next year) I might be starting a Cross-Linux project.
The next stage is to develop X apps 
using Lazarus. But for these I need to get FPC working.

Do you really want to run Lazarus on the ARM-system ?

While this _should_ be possible somehow, It might be quite slow compared 
to what can be done on a PC with cross-compiling.


Moreover I have no idea how well gdb might work in such an environment 
(gdb-user interface in the ARM target) Using cross-gdb from a PC onto 
the arm device via Ethernet seems the more user-friendly (and more 
standard).


Please let us know how you proceed with this interesting stuff.

-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] FreePascal on ARM Linux ,SoftFloat and EABI issues

2008-06-02 Thread Michael Schnell


But it has its own set of problems. I'm not really dedicated enough, 
but I never managed to cross-compile complex projects (by complex I 
mean with various dependencies on external libraries).
Native is so much easieronce you get the ball rolling (but then 
the same could be said for cross-compiling)
Anyway, it seems that an emulated arm machine, while slower than 
cross-compiling, is faster than the real arm hardware.
I just assume that when trying to make FP and GDB and Lazarus run 
natively on ARM you are on your own, while cross compiling for ARM-Linux 
is a supported option on Lazarus and thus the powers than be should be 
interested on helping you top make it work perfectly. It's a mixture of 
ARM-CE (i.e. the compiler, which already seems to work quite well) and 
native Linux (the libraries, which do work nicely).


-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] FreePascal on ARM Linux ,SoftFloat and EABI issues

2008-06-02 Thread Marco van de Voort
 Michael Schnell escribi?:
  
  Let me remind you that i am dont use a Cross compiler, but an emulated 
  Arm machine.

  That is interesting, but is it really useful ? Cross-compiling seems 
  more standard. 
 
 
 But it has its own set of problems. I'm not really dedicated enough, but 
 I never managed to cross-compile complex projects (by complex I mean 
 with various dependencies on external libraries).
 Native is so much easieronce you get the ball rolling (but then the 
 same could be said for cross-compiling)
 Anyway, it seems that an emulated arm machine, while slower than 
 cross-compiling, is faster than the real arm hardware.

It is possible, and in the buildfaq there is an example (lazarus from
windows to linux).

Note that crosscompiling is not free of problems anyway. Sometimes the
binaries simply don't work, I always blamed it on the cross binutils though.

___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] FreePascal on ARM Linux ,SoftFloat and EABI issues

2008-06-02 Thread Luca Olivetti

Michael Schnell escribió:


Let me remind you that i am dont use a Cross compiler, but an emulated 
Arm machine.
  
That is interesting, but is it really useful ? Cross-compiling seems 
more standard. 



But it has its own set of problems. I'm not really dedicated enough, but 
I never managed to cross-compile complex projects (by complex I mean 
with various dependencies on external libraries).
Native is so much easieronce you get the ball rolling (but then the 
same could be said for cross-compiling)
Anyway, it seems that an emulated arm machine, while slower than 
cross-compiling, is faster than the real arm hardware.


Bye
--
Luca

___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] FreePascal on ARM Linux ,SoftFloat and EABI issues

2008-05-31 Thread Yury Sidorov

From: Nataraj S Narayan

Hi Florian and other friends

I am involved in porting existing C code to Arm Linux for 
AT91SAM9263 Ek board with 340x220 display. I need to write

lots of console kinda apps.
I am using a qemu-system-arm emulated  Armel Debian machine on a
Debian x86 Lenny distro for writing code. I installed 
fpc-2.2.0.arm-linux.tar on the emulated linux.Which compiling a
simple helloworld.pas , i get the classic error of System.o  being 
EABI 0 while target is EABI 4.


I have got the svn download of fpc, and trying to compile it in the 
emulated machine for ARM for the past 2 days.  I
have given :-make clean all ARCH=arm OPT=-CfSoft.Its compiling for 
quite long and finally comes to rest endlessly
while compiling system.pp.Let me remind you that i am dont use a 
Cross compiler, but an emulated Arm machine.


Try to crosscompile fpc 2.2.1 or 2.3.1 compiler binary and then use 
this binary as starting compiler on arm machine.


Yury. 
___

fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] FreePascal on ARM Linux ,SoftFloat and EABI issues

2008-05-31 Thread Luca Olivetti

En/na Yury Sidorov ha escrit:



Try to crosscompile fpc 2.2.1 or 2.3.1 compiler binary and then use this 
binary as starting compiler on arm machine.


In my case, before trying to compile using the native 2.2.0, I tried 
crosscompiling from linux/i386, but:


$ make all install CPU_TARGET=arm 
CROSSBINDIR=/scratchbox/compilers/cs2005q3.2-glibc2.5-arm/bin 
BINUTILSPREFIX=arm-linux- CPU_T CROSSOPT='-CfSOFT -darm -dFPC-ARMEL -gl'

Makefile:129: *** Compiler ppcrossarm not found.  Stop.


Bye
--
Luca
___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] FreePascal on ARM Linux ,SoftFloat and EABI issues

2008-05-31 Thread Jonas Maebe


On 31 May 2008, at 22:02, Luca Olivetti wrote:


En/na Yury Sidorov ha escrit:

Try to crosscompile fpc 2.2.1 or 2.3.1 compiler binary and then use  
this binary as starting compiler on arm machine.


In my case, before trying to compile using the native 2.2.0, I tried  
crosscompiling from linux/i386, but:


$ make all install CPU_TARGET=arm CROSSBINDIR=/scratchbox/compilers/ 
cs2005q3.2-glibc2.5-arm/bin BINUTILSPREFIX=arm-linux- CPU_T  
CROSSOPT='-CfSOFT -darm -dFPC-ARMEL -gl'

Makefile:129: *** Compiler ppcrossarm not found.  Stop.


Add

FPC=/full/path/to/ppc386-2.2.1 (or 2.3.1, depending on which version  
you are trying to compiler for ARM; in any case, make sure you use the  
same version of ppc386 as starting compiler)





Jonas
___
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel