Re: [fpc-devel] Problem with PASSRC units

2004-12-06 Thread Michael Van Canneyt


On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 While attempting to run MAKESKEL/FPDOC against the Windows system unit, I
 got an error on the line TPCharArray = packed array [ .
 stating 'Expected record at token array'
 In researching this problem, I found that the PASSRC units only handled
 packed records, although the packed directive is also valid for arrays, 
 objects
 and classes. The attached patches add that support pscanner, pastree  and
 paswrite. MAKESKEL and FPDOC now work fine.

Did you use the latest CVS for this, because I corrected this already
for the system unit docs less than a week ago ?

I will have a look at the patch anyway, thanks!

Michael.

___
fpc-devel maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel


Re: [fpc-devel] Problem with PASSRC units

2004-12-06 Thread Michael Van Canneyt


On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:



 On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  While attempting to run MAKESKEL/FPDOC against the Windows system unit, I
  got an error on the line TPCharArray = packed array [ .
  stating 'Expected record at token array'
  In researching this problem, I found that the PASSRC units only handled
  packed records, although the packed directive is also valid for arrays, 
  objects
  and classes. The attached patches add that support pscanner, pastree  and
  paswrite. MAKESKEL and FPDOC now work fine.

 Did you use the latest CVS for this, because I corrected this already
 for the system unit docs less than a week ago ?

 I will have a look at the patch anyway, thanks!

My apologies. Seems I didn't commit my patch yet :/
I applied yours.

Michael.

___
fpc-devel maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel