Re: [fpc-pascal] How to use OpenGL 2.0 features
On Wed, 13 May 2009 15:56:10 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Binding flexibility is required, if application is to be distributed.
There's no way to say, what kind of OpenGL drivers is installed on the
next machine.
First of all this is no answer to my question. I was speaking about 3.x and
deprecated 1.1 features.
Second, as long as you don't use features the target machine does not support
there is no problem with exposing all OpenGL functions. This is how it is done
in C/C++ on non Windows OSes since forever.
The most robust code is the following:
if not Load_SomeFunc_asCore and
not Load_SomeFunc_asExtension then begin
writeln('Please, update OpenGL drivers');
Halt;
end;
The 'normal' way of doing this is by checking the reported OpenGL version and
query the extension string for your wanted functionality (glGet functions).
Your way may expose functions whose entry points are defined in the driver but
not advertised in the extension string (ATI did this alot to give developers
some time to play with the extensions which they thought were not really ready
for the general usage). Of couse it is ok to use these extensions just not
recommended for published software.
I know, it's easy, to say: My application requirement is GL 2.0 or
higher, but, personally, i prefer to care about the user, rather
making him/her to install latests drivers.
It is nice that there are some OpenGL developers who only need the basics. No
problem with that. But if you are doing anything remotely advanced then 2.0 is
an acceptable requirement (keyword: programmable pipeline).
IMHO it is better to tell the user that his driver (and most likely his
hardware) are not good enough for the job than to give him some sh***y
experience.
It is frustating for the user to see 1.000.000+ polygon scenes with
per-fragment lighting and soft shadows in your screenshots and if he fires up
the application he gets 15 triangles on a black background and does not know
why.
But I think we are slowly moving OT here. If you want to discuss general OpenGL
development with me, you can send me a private mail.
I don't really have any problems with the bindings in general. It is just that
they force you to do some things that are not needed on non Windows platforms.
I can live with that, but you can try as hard as you like, I won't believe you
that there are other reasons for the state of the bindings than that they are
'just' a Delphi port.
The only real problem I have is that I don't get all functions up to version
x.x if I load_gl_version_x_x. But I hope my patch will be accepted to remedy
this problem.
S.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] How to use OpenGL 2.0 features
On Mon, 11 May 2009 10:12:11 +0400 dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote: The binding treats OpenGL versions in the same way as any other extension. Which isn't a good thing IMHO. The artificial limitation that you have to load higher version functions like extensions is just because M$ did and does not want to support OpenGL properly. As stated neither Linux nor OS X need this. So the bindings actually cripple the functionality of not M$ users. In C/C++ you can just include gl.h and glext.h and are done with it (as long as you don't work under Windoze). Only new version function are loaded on demand. This makes the binding very *flexible*. Because some obsolete functions might be removed in future OpenGL versions. OpenGL up to 2.1 is fully backward compatible. Although there does not seem to be a requirement to do so, I don't know of any extension that ever got removed from the driver. Doing so would break older programs relying on the functionality, which no vendor likes to do. It is just not good when old games don't work anymore just because you updated your driver from 1.5 to 2.0. Instead of changing the binding, why don't you just declare a single utility function for your needs? I don't want any workarounds. I want a clean and sane set of bindings that is not a major PITA to use. I don't have any need to switch to FPCs bindings. I don't support Windows and I have my own bindings where I don't even have to load extensions. I just check the string if the functionality is there and if so use it. I was just thinking that it would be a better idea to not do double work and therefor I am in the process of testing the FPC bindings. Unfortunately FPCs bindings are based on Delphi ones and all the limitations and annoyances I talk about originate from this fact. If you are a Windows user you will not notice much trouble as under Windows it is the normal way of using OpenGL (in any programming language). If you are not a windows user it is a major PITA. Chaning the binding might also break some existing code written with using it. May be. If this is a problem and nothing shall be changed then I am just wasting my time here. Tell me and I am back to my own stuff. S. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] How to use OpenGL 2.0 features
On Mon, 11 May 2009 03:09:40 +0200 Michalis Kamburelis michalis.ka...@gmail.com wrote: Change this e.g. to follow each Result := Load_GL_version_1_5; by if not Result then Exit; Result := FALSE; Instead I moved the Load_GL_version_x_x calls to the end of the functions. Replacing Result:=TRUE; ... to make sure that Load_GL_version_2_0 returns true *only* if both Load_GL_version_1_5 succeeded *and* all functions on level 2.0 succeeded. You are absolutely correct. S. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] How to use OpenGL 2.0 features
On Mon, 11 May 2009 10:12:11 +0400 dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote: Only new version function are loaded on demand. This makes the binding very *flexible*. Because some obsolete functions might be removed in future OpenGL versions. OpenGL 3.x also deprecates many OpenGL 1.1 functions (for example immediate mode). OpenGL 1.1 is not loaded (as there is no need even on windows) so how does the 'flexibility' help us there? I also fail to see how loading of OpenGL 1.5 for example helps, if only two of 1.5s functions are deprecated. The bindings have to be changed nonetheless. The bindings where not created with flexibility in mind. It looks more like somebody just ported the Delphi bindings without really knowing what he is doing. No offense meant here just an observation. S. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] How to use OpenGL 2.0 fatures
On Sat, 9 May 2009 22:29:51 +0400 dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote: ANY OS must call it (both Linux and OSX), otherwise function variables are not initialized! But this is an FPC restriction not an OpenGL one. My own OpenGL headers did not need this and they worked. Anyway, thanks for the information. S. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] How to use OpenGL 2.0 features
On Sat, 9 May 2009 22:29:51 +0400
dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
uses
...gl, glext...
...
if not Load_GL_version_2_0 then begin
writeln('OpenGL 2.0 is not supported');
Halt;
end;
...
This does not work for me. I added it to the Init function of my render engine
(as I know that at this time I have a valid OpenGL context) to no avail. My
code keeps crashing at
this call (in a different unit, so I tried calling Load_GL_version_2_0 there
too, with the same result):
if glIsBufferARB(VertexBuffer)=GL_TRUE then (asmtypes.pas:2212)
The backtrace is not very helpfull for me:
#0 0x in ?? ()
#1 0x00750491 in CREATEBUFFERS (this=0x7fb7e83cd200)
at asmtypes.pas:2212
So I tried just loading the VBO extension:
if not glext_LoadExtension('GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object') then begin
writeln('VBO is not supported');
Halt;
end;
Resulting in this:
#0 0x00760a6f in GLEXT_EXTENSIONSUPPORTED (
EXTENSION=0xb39788 'GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object',
SEARCHIN=0x7f7988ac2320 'GL_ARB_color_buffer_float GL_ARB_depth_texture
GL_ARB_draw_buffers GL_ARB_fragment_program GL_ARB_fragment_program_shadow
GL_ARB_fragment_shader GL_ARB_half_float_pixel GL_ARB_half_float_vertex
GL_ARB'...)
at gllibs/glext.pp:4268
#1 0x0076c7f3 in LOAD_GL_ARB_VERTEX_BUFFER_OBJECT ()
at gllibs/glext.pp:7591
#2 0x007736c3 in GLEXT_LOADEXTENSION (
EXT=0xb2d788 'GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object') at gllibs/glext.pp:9509
This is on Ubuntu 9.04 64-bit.
My card and driver support OpenGL Version 2.1.2, so that is not the problem.
Anyone any ideas?
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] How to use OpenGL 2.0 features
On Sun, 10 May 2009 17:54:49 +0400 dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote: hope it helps. It does, thanks. So it looks like I have to init all OpenGL versions from 1.2 to 2.0 to make sure that all OpenGL 2.0 core functions are initialized. Is this true? Nonetheless, I don't understand why the ARB version does not work. AFAIK it has the same entry points as the core functionality and OpenGL versions are required to support the ARB version of functions even if the non ARB version is in the core now. Am I doing something wrong or is extension loading broken? -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] How to use OpenGL 2.0 features
On Sun, 10 May 2009 18:46:26 +0400 dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote: So it looks like I have to init all OpenGL versions from 1.2 to 2.0 to make sure that all OpenGL 2.0 core functions are initialized. Is this true? Judging from glext, it's true. This makes no sense to me. I can submit a patch so that all lower version functions are loaded when the higher version is loaded (hope it is understood what I mean). I already modified the glext file and just want to know if there is any interest or if the current behaviour has any advantages I fail to see. why don't you bind them into single one? if glIsBufferARB = nil then glIsBufferARB := @glIsBuffer; Because I only need one working function. I am just trying to understand the limitations of the bindings as there seems to be no documentation. If I will use them, I'd like to improve the current situation and make them as standard complient as possible. S. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] How to use OpenGL 2.0 features
On Sun, 10 May 2009 22:40:59 +0200 Michalis Kamburelis michalis.ka...@gmail.com wrote: Lord Satan wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2009 18:46:26 +0400 dmitry boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote: You mean you want to change Load_GL_version_2_0 to also call Load_GL_version_1_5 under the hood, and then Load_GL_version_1_5 to call Load_GL_version_1_4 under the hood and so on? Yes. I guess that's Ok, go for it. Will do. Be aware that this will *not* work for OpenGL 3.x versions, where 3.0 deprecates and 3.1 removes some functions. I know. But this is only true for a 'forward compatible context'. Otherwise old functionality is fully supported. Btw the header do not even support 2.1 so no need to think about 3.x anytime soon. ;) Thanks for the input. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] How to use OpenGL 2.0 features
On Sun, 10 May 2009 23:47:07 +0200 Lord Satan reimg...@web.de wrote: I uploaded the patch to the bug tracker as issue #0013687 S. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] -Opentium3 Error
On Sat, 9 May 2009 21:02:03 +0800 Lou James aquarh...@gmail.com wrote: By the way,Win7 RC is great. Yeah, and pigs can fly. http://www.infopackets.com/news/software/windows_tips/2009/20090507_windows_7_users_warned_over_filename_security_risk.htm http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/05/r2e-microsoft-intel-goof-up-windows-7s-xp-mode.ars No need to reply. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Re: [fpc-pascal] -Opentium3 Error
On Sat, 9 May 2009 16:03:35 +0200 Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote: Your reply was just as unnecessary to such an aside. You are absolutely right. I sincerely apologize and will refrain myself from commenting on windows in the future. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
