DTP (sort of) issue

2008-12-20 Thread Alan Litchfield
Hi Allison,

Good on you for switching the journal publication to Frame ;)

The first question that comes to mind is, why are you exporting to  
XML? Why not use mif2go and to straight to html? You could perhaps use  
style sheets provided by the web developer and further reduce the  
amount of work required.

Alan

On 20/12/2008, at 6:24 AM, Alison Peck wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I've been using FM now for a couple of years to typeset two  
> journals. I know
> it's a strange use, but it has been working well for a number of  
> reasons:
>
> 1)  The magazines include a fair number of equations
>
> 2)  The journals are for programmers, and include a lot of code  
> listings
>
> 3)  They include a mix of high-resolution photographs and low- 
> res screen
> shots
>
> 4)  One of the journals is also published on a website  
> electronically,
> and I've been using WebWorks to generate the XML that I then send  
> off to
> someone else for subsequent processing
>
> 5)  I already owned (and am an experienced user of) FrameMaker.  
> at the
> time, we were moving from an old version of Quark and anything that  
> meant I
> didn't have to space text using tabs then draw in the lines every  
> time I
> wanted a table had to be an improvement.
>
>
>
> If I insert images, boxed code listing, etc. in anchored frames, the
> contents (I believe, but I've not tested exhaustively) are exported  
> to XML
> in the correct positions (can anyone confirm that this is absolutely  
> the
> case?). However, my ability to position these items is then limited  
> - I have
> much more flexibility if I put them in a non-anchored frame of some  
> sort. I
> realise I could move the anchor to help with the position. but that  
> defeats
> the object of keeping things in the right order.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, during a redesign a while ago now, nearly all of the  
> listings
> and most of the images were lifted out of the main flow. This has  
> greatly
> improved the appearance for print - and the ease of reading, where  
> listings
> used to start and stop in strange places -  but made the job of the  
> guy
> working with the XML much harder. he's just let me know he's  
> struggling!!
> Most of the listings get dumped at the end of the XML but not  
> necessarily in
> the correct order and quite a few of the listings split across more  
> than one
> "box".
>
>
>
> I'm currently using FrameMaker 7.2 and the bundled WebWorks that  
> came with
> it.
>
>
>
> What I want to know is:
>
>
>
> 1)  Am I missing a trick with FM? Is there a way to indicate where
> something should be positioned if outside the constraints of paper  
> but keep
> the flexibility of positions (sometimes even on a facing page!)  
> required
> when working for print
>
> 2)  Can anyone recommend an alternative package that can do  
> this? Work
> well for print (at least as good as FM) but also exports to XML with  
> things
> in a logical order? (When we used Quark, the listings were just  
> sequential -
> sometimes you got just one or two lines at the bottom of a page and  
> the rest
> overleaf. nobody was happy with it, except for the guy converting to  
> XML ;-)
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, for reasons of layout, many of FM's automated  
> features are
> not being used (ToC is generated manually, because it contains short
> descriptions of the articles; in-text references are in a very non- 
> standard
> format and I need to be able to choose where exactly to place  
> footnotes).
>
>
>
> I appreciate that anything is going to require some manual tweaking  
> to the
> XML. merging a "cont'd" listing into the one before, for example. but
> minimising this would be great.
>
>
>
> If anyone needs to see a PDF of the journal to see what I'm trying to
> achieve, I'm happy to send one out - please contact me off-list.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
>
>
> Alison
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> You are currently subscribed to Framers as alan at alphabyte.co.nz.
>
> Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit 
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/alan%40alphabyte.co.nz
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.

--
Alan Litchfield MBus(Hons), MNZCS
AlphaByte
PO Box 1941, Auckland, NZ. 1140
http://www.alphabyte.co.nz






DTP (sort of) issue

2008-12-19 Thread Alison Peck
Hi,

 

I've been using FM now for a couple of years to typeset two journals. I know
it's a strange use, but it has been working well for a number of reasons:

1)  The magazines include a fair number of equations

2)  The journals are for programmers, and include a lot of code listings

3)  They include a mix of high-resolution photographs and low-res screen
shots

4)  One of the journals is also published on a website electronically,
and I've been using WebWorks to generate the XML that I then send off to
someone else for subsequent processing

5)  I already owned (and am an experienced user of) FrameMaker. at the
time, we were moving from an old version of Quark and anything that meant I
didn't have to space text using tabs then draw in the lines every time I
wanted a table had to be an improvement.

 

If I insert images, boxed code listing, etc. in anchored frames, the
contents (I believe, but I've not tested exhaustively) are exported to XML
in the correct positions (can anyone confirm that this is absolutely the
case?). However, my ability to position these items is then limited - I have
much more flexibility if I put them in a non-anchored frame of some sort. I
realise I could move the anchor to help with the position. but that defeats
the object of keeping things in the right order.

 

Unfortunately, during a redesign a while ago now, nearly all of the listings
and most of the images were lifted out of the main flow. This has greatly
improved the appearance for print - and the ease of reading, where listings
used to start and stop in strange places -  but made the job of the guy
working with the XML much harder. he's just let me know he's struggling!!
Most of the listings get dumped at the end of the XML but not necessarily in
the correct order and quite a few of the listings split across more than one
box.

 

I'm currently using FrameMaker 7.2 and the bundled WebWorks that came with
it.

 

What I want to know is:

 

1)  Am I missing a trick with FM? Is there a way to indicate where
something should be positioned if outside the constraints of paper but keep
the flexibility of positions (sometimes even on a facing page!) required
when working for print

2)  Can anyone recommend an alternative package that can do this? Work
well for print (at least as good as FM) but also exports to XML with things
in a logical order? (When we used Quark, the listings were just sequential -
sometimes you got just one or two lines at the bottom of a page and the rest
overleaf. nobody was happy with it, except for the guy converting to XML ;-)

 

Unfortunately, for reasons of layout, many of FM's automated features are
not being used (ToC is generated manually, because it contains short
descriptions of the articles; in-text references are in a very non-standard
format and I need to be able to choose where exactly to place footnotes).

 

I appreciate that anything is going to require some manual tweaking to the
XML. merging a cont'd listing into the one before, for example. but
minimising this would be great.

 

If anyone needs to see a PDF of the journal to see what I'm trying to
achieve, I'm happy to send one out - please contact me off-list.


Thanks in advance,

 

 

Alison

 

___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


Re: DTP (sort of) issue

2008-12-19 Thread Alan Litchfield
Hi Allison,

Good on you for switching the journal publication to Frame ;)

The first question that comes to mind is, why are you exporting to  
XML? Why not use mif2go and to straight to html? You could perhaps use  
style sheets provided by the web developer and further reduce the  
amount of work required.

Alan

On 20/12/2008, at 6:24 AM, Alison Peck wrote:

 Hi,



 I've been using FM now for a couple of years to typeset two  
 journals. I know
 it's a strange use, but it has been working well for a number of  
 reasons:

 1)  The magazines include a fair number of equations

 2)  The journals are for programmers, and include a lot of code  
 listings

 3)  They include a mix of high-resolution photographs and low- 
 res screen
 shots

 4)  One of the journals is also published on a website  
 electronically,
 and I've been using WebWorks to generate the XML that I then send  
 off to
 someone else for subsequent processing

 5)  I already owned (and am an experienced user of) FrameMaker.  
 at the
 time, we were moving from an old version of Quark and anything that  
 meant I
 didn't have to space text using tabs then draw in the lines every  
 time I
 wanted a table had to be an improvement.



 If I insert images, boxed code listing, etc. in anchored frames, the
 contents (I believe, but I've not tested exhaustively) are exported  
 to XML
 in the correct positions (can anyone confirm that this is absolutely  
 the
 case?). However, my ability to position these items is then limited  
 - I have
 much more flexibility if I put them in a non-anchored frame of some  
 sort. I
 realise I could move the anchor to help with the position. but that  
 defeats
 the object of keeping things in the right order.



 Unfortunately, during a redesign a while ago now, nearly all of the  
 listings
 and most of the images were lifted out of the main flow. This has  
 greatly
 improved the appearance for print - and the ease of reading, where  
 listings
 used to start and stop in strange places -  but made the job of the  
 guy
 working with the XML much harder. he's just let me know he's  
 struggling!!
 Most of the listings get dumped at the end of the XML but not  
 necessarily in
 the correct order and quite a few of the listings split across more  
 than one
 box.



 I'm currently using FrameMaker 7.2 and the bundled WebWorks that  
 came with
 it.



 What I want to know is:



 1)  Am I missing a trick with FM? Is there a way to indicate where
 something should be positioned if outside the constraints of paper  
 but keep
 the flexibility of positions (sometimes even on a facing page!)  
 required
 when working for print

 2)  Can anyone recommend an alternative package that can do  
 this? Work
 well for print (at least as good as FM) but also exports to XML with  
 things
 in a logical order? (When we used Quark, the listings were just  
 sequential -
 sometimes you got just one or two lines at the bottom of a page and  
 the rest
 overleaf. nobody was happy with it, except for the guy converting to  
 XML ;-)



 Unfortunately, for reasons of layout, many of FM's automated  
 features are
 not being used (ToC is generated manually, because it contains short
 descriptions of the articles; in-text references are in a very non- 
 standard
 format and I need to be able to choose where exactly to place  
 footnotes).



 I appreciate that anything is going to require some manual tweaking  
 to the
 XML. merging a cont'd listing into the one before, for example. but
 minimising this would be great.



 If anyone needs to see a PDF of the journal to see what I'm trying to
 achieve, I'm happy to send one out - please contact me off-list.


 Thanks in advance,





 Alison



 ___


 You are currently subscribed to Framers as a...@alphabyte.co.nz.

 Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com.

 To unsubscribe send a blank email to
 framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
 or visit 
 http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/alan%40alphabyte.co.nz

 Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
 http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.

--
Alan Litchfield MBus(Hons), MNZCS
AlphaByte
PO Box 1941, Auckland, NZ. 1140
http://www.alphabyte.co.nz




___


You are currently subscribed to Framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.

Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.


DTP (sort of) issue

2008-12-19 Thread Alison Peck
Hi,



I've been using FM now for a couple of years to typeset two journals. I know
it's a strange use, but it has been working well for a number of reasons:

1)  The magazines include a fair number of equations

2)  The journals are for programmers, and include a lot of code listings

3)  They include a mix of high-resolution photographs and low-res screen
shots

4)  One of the journals is also published on a website electronically,
and I've been using WebWorks to generate the XML that I then send off to
someone else for subsequent processing

5)  I already owned (and am an experienced user of) FrameMaker. at the
time, we were moving from an old version of Quark and anything that meant I
didn't have to space text using tabs then draw in the lines every time I
wanted a table had to be an improvement.



If I insert images, boxed code listing, etc. in anchored frames, the
contents (I believe, but I've not tested exhaustively) are exported to XML
in the correct positions (can anyone confirm that this is absolutely the
case?). However, my ability to position these items is then limited - I have
much more flexibility if I put them in a non-anchored frame of some sort. I
realise I could move the anchor to help with the position. but that defeats
the object of keeping things in the right order.



Unfortunately, during a redesign a while ago now, nearly all of the listings
and most of the images were lifted out of the main flow. This has greatly
improved the appearance for print - and the ease of reading, where listings
used to start and stop in strange places -  but made the job of the guy
working with the XML much harder. he's just let me know he's struggling!!
Most of the listings get dumped at the end of the XML but not necessarily in
the correct order and quite a few of the listings split across more than one
"box".



I'm currently using FrameMaker 7.2 and the bundled WebWorks that came with
it.



What I want to know is:



1)  Am I missing a trick with FM? Is there a way to indicate where
something should be positioned if outside the constraints of paper but keep
the flexibility of positions (sometimes even on a facing page!) required
when working for print

2)  Can anyone recommend an alternative package that can do this? Work
well for print (at least as good as FM) but also exports to XML with things
in a logical order? (When we used Quark, the listings were just sequential -
sometimes you got just one or two lines at the bottom of a page and the rest
overleaf. nobody was happy with it, except for the guy converting to XML ;-)



Unfortunately, for reasons of layout, many of FM's automated features are
not being used (ToC is generated manually, because it contains short
descriptions of the articles; in-text references are in a very non-standard
format and I need to be able to choose where exactly to place footnotes).



I appreciate that anything is going to require some manual tweaking to the
XML. merging a "cont'd" listing into the one before, for example. but
minimising this would be great.



If anyone needs to see a PDF of the journal to see what I'm trying to
achieve, I'm happy to send one out - please contact me off-list.


Thanks in advance,





Alison