Re: [Framework-Team] Reworking the PLIP Lifecycle | discussion
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes: Elizabeth Leddy ele...@umich.edu writes: Thanks for all the feedback guys! Curious what current team members think +1, though I expected to gather more contradicting perspectives before weighing in in. Ok, so Eric I think we're a go. Lets schedule another FWT meeting and hammer out the details. Liz, get ready! :-) Ross On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote: On 2011-1-16 22:46, Martin Aspeli wrote: I suspect they can be overcome by release managers setting target dates, asking people to contribute to a particular milestone date for a particular planned release, but not holding up a release if people slip. Many smaller deadlines can be better than fewer big ones. If you have many small deadlines they effectively become meaningless since people will just wait for the next one (to fly by). I've always tried to advocate a more continuous development pattern and I love Elizabeth's proposal. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Re: [Framework-Team] Reworking the PLIP Lifecycle | discussion
On Feb 9, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Ross Patterson wrote: Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes: Elizabeth Leddy ele...@umich.edu writes: Thanks for all the feedback guys! Curious what current team members think +1, though I expected to gather more contradicting perspectives before weighing in in. Ok, so Eric I think we're a go. Lets schedule another FWT meeting and hammer out the details. Liz, get ready! :-) Ross Yes, sorry I never managed to respond to this. I have 12 different theses sitting in my drafts folder and never quite managed to accurately capture what I wanted to say. Basically: 1) Consider me +1000 on this 2) Let's plan on faster/regular/smaller releases 3) Review process should be a process of continuous feedback, not the stop doing things so we can maybe look at it over the next 6 weeks 4) We need to be able to adapt to ideas that happen in the run-up to a release (see Geir's discovery of other places contentlistings could be used) 4) 4.2 should be focused on getting events, collections, content listings, search results. These need to happen. 5) Let's chat about this on Tuesday Eric ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
